Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION Leonie M. Brinkema, United States District Judge Before the Court is defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. No. 3], which has been fully briefed and argued. For the reasons that follow, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part. I. BACKGROUND Sara Judith Garcia Galdamez, Jorge Armando Escobar Barillas, and Virginia de Jesus Pena

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WILLIAM RICHARD KRUSE, ) individually and as TRUSTEE for THE ) VIVIAN CALVERT KRUSE LIVING ) TRUST and THE WILLIAM ) RICHARD KRUSE LIVING TRUST, ) ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 12392-VCS ) SYNA

*945ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Docket No. 100 EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge Plaintiffs have filed a securities class action against Defendant' Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. (“LF”) and two of its executive officers, John Barbour (CEO) and Raymond L. Arthur. Since appointme

ORDER & OPINION JOE BILLY McDADE, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Transfer of Venue, filed November 21, 2012. (Doc. 60). Plaintiff has responded in opposition, and the Motion is now ready for disposition. For the reasons stated below, the Motion to Transfer is granted. Plaintiff has also filed a Motion for Status Conferenc

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) IN RE EXAMWORKS GROUP, INC. ) Consolidated STOCKHOLDER APPRAISAL ) C.A. No. 12688-VCL LITIGATION ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: February 13, 2018 Date Decided: February 21,

USCA11 Case: 22-10575 Document: 65-1 Date Filed: 07/07/2023 Page: 1 of 92 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-10575 ____________________ GEORGE TERSHAKOVEC, D

USCA11 Case: 19-14434 Date Filed: 10/28/2021 Page: 1 of 65 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-14434 ____________________ RICHARD HUNSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus PREFERRED COLLECTION AND MANAGEMENT

958 N.E.2d 285 (2011) 354 Ill. Dec. 542 Ester SORIA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHRYSLER CANADA, INC., Defendant-Appellant (Key Safety Systems, Inc., and Harvey Lee Sledge, Defendants). No. 2-10-1236. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. June 24, 2011. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing October 24, 2011.

OPINION and ORDER BLOCK, Judge. The court is faced with two post-judgment motions filed by plaintiff, Madison Services, Inc. The first, plaintiffs motion for relief from judgment, filed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), represents plaintiffs third attempt to secure a government contract that it presumptively won from the Fedei'al Emergency Management A

286 F.Supp.2d 625 (2003) SEALY, INC., as Plan Administrator for the Sealy, Inc. PPO Plan, Plaintiff, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Allison Barman, Bruce Barman, Defendants. No. 1:02 CV 217. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. September 29, 2003. *626 Debbie

639 F.Supp.2d 903 (2009) METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant v. DELPHI AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS LLC, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Marian, Inc., Defendant. Delphi Technologies, Inc., Counter-Claimant. No. 09 CV 2191. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 16, 2009. *905 Charles Ran

88 F.Supp.2d 851 (1999) Andrew J. MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. AVON PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant. No. 99 C 2770. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 4, 1999. *852 Albert Brooks Friedman, Law Offices of Albert Friedman, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Stephen J. Landes, Holleb & Coff, Chicago, IL, Jo

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Joy Flowers Conti, Chief United States District Judge I. Introduction This, action was brought by plaintiffs Trinity Industries, Inc. and Trinity Industries Railcar .Corporation (together with Trinity Industries, Inc., the “Trinity plaintiffs”) seeking contribution under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“C

FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 NO. CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR TH

OPINION HORN, Judge. FINDINGS OF FACT Alleging a breach of contract, plaintiff Digital Technologies, Inc. (DTI), seeks damages for breach of a fair opportunity to compete clause under its multiple-award, Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) contract with United States Customs and Border Protection (Customs) of the United States Department of Homeland Security. The alleged br

OPINION AND ORDER * GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge. These consolidated bid protests arise out of the United States Air Force’s (“Air Force’s”) exercise of options on four of six indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (“ID/IQ”) contracts to supply health care service providers. Plaintiffs Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. (“Magnum Opus”) and The Healing Staff, Inc. (“Healing Staff

RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD SWEENEY, Judge. Before the court are Plaintiffs Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record (“motion to supplement”); Intervenor QSS’s Motion to Admit Harm Declaration of Wil*55liam R. Bowen and to Strike Improper Lay Opinion Testimony From Declarations in Support of Pla

OPINION 1 PAUL B. LINDSEY, Bankruptcy Judge. I.Introduction On December 5, 2001, Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc. and certain affiliated entities (hereinafter referred to as “Debtors”) filed petitions under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. Pursuant to the Modified First Amended and Joint Plan of Reorganization of Hayes Lemmerz In

OPINION MEROW, Senior Judge. This matter is before the court in this contract dispute action brought pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (“CDA”), upon defendant’s motion to dismiss a portion of plaintiffs complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). One of the jurisdictional predicates to commencing a

ACCEPTED 01-14-00880-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/25/2015 3:28:27 PM