Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

STROUD, Judge. Five Wins, LLC (“defendant”), appeals from an order entered 18 September 2013, requiring the trustee of property encumbered by a deed of trust to pay Iris Enterprises (“plaintiff”) $24,291.24 as surplus from the foreclosure sale of that property. We affirm. I. Background On 8 March 2007, Greenfield Durham, LLC exec

Order entered June 17, 2015 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01562-CV QUICK CHANGE ARTIST, LLC, Appellant V. IRIS T. ACCESSORIES, Appellee On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Mr. JUSTICE GUILD delivered the opinion of the court: The defendant herein was indicted for theft by deception, was tried by a jury, and upon conviction was sentenced to 2-10 years in the state penitentiary. The defendant raises two questions in this appeal. The first contention is that the State failed to prove ownership of the property, and t

ORDER JOEL J. TYLER, United States Magistrate Judge. BACKGROUND For a factual background and procedural history, we refer to our Report and Recommendation, 90 Civ 2379 (VLB), filed September 5, 1990, familiarity with which is assumed. Since the date of that Report, discovery has been proceeding under our direction. The instant matter concerns certain discovery requests and deposition que

MINER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellants Salamanca Coalition of United Taxpayers, Inc. (“SCOUT”), representing nearly 600 lessees, and five individual lessees (collectively “Appellants”) commenced this action against their lessors, the Seneca Nation of Indians (“Nation”), and against the Salamanca Indian Lease Authority (“SILA"), the City of Salamanca (“City”) and various City officials to compel the Nation to renew their

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: *1242 In this toxic tort suit, Rhonda Williams appeals the District Court's grant of summary judgment against her and in favor of Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC ("Mosaic"). Ms. Williams alleged that toxic substances emitted from a factory operated by Mosaic caused or exace

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss, filed May 23, 2012 (Doc. 17). The Court held a hearing on November 9, 2012. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court should extend a cause of action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, <

679 F.Supp.2d 161 (2010) Sheryl A. PEASE and Little Sprouts Day Care, Plaintiffs v. Karen BURNS, Erin Murphy Craft, Linda Lenahan, Eric Lieberman, Judy Pasko, Denise J. Karlin, Brian Letendre, Iris Crispo, Constantia T. Papanikolaou, John Daly, Ann Reale, John and Jane Doe A-Z, The Department of Early Education and Childcare, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-30222-MAP. <

PER CURIAM. Appellant, counterplaintiff below, appeals a “judgment” granting appel-lee/counterdefendant’s motion for summary judgment as to a three-count counterclaim. The decretal portion of the trial court’s “judgment” reads: ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, that Counter-defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby granted. This order is merely authorization

204 B.R. 842 (1996) Vinicio MEDRANO DIAZ, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. Teresa VAZQUEZ-BOTET, et al., Appellees-Defendants. Civil Nos. 95-2452(DRD), 96-1980(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. December 31, 1996. *843 Igor Dominguez-Perez, Hato Rey, PR, for Vinicio Medrano-Diaz. Victor P. Miranda-Corrada, Hato Rey

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06

John Mauzy Pittman, Judge. Lynn Nelson Teague appeals from an order of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission denying him additional benefits, except spousal nursing care. Appellant contends that the Commission’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence and that appellee is estopped from denying benefits. We find no error and affirm. Appellant sustained a comp

"Williams, Judge : Plaintiff, administratrix, of her deceased husband, Clark R. McClain, recovered a judgment against the Marietta Torpedo Company in an action of trespass for negligently causing his death, and defendant brings error. His death was caused by the premature explosion of nitroglycerine at an oil well in Roane county, known as the Jacob Reynolds Well No. 3, where defendant’s agent, AYilliam Nor

OPINION AND ORDER JUAN M. PEREZ-GIMENEZ, District Judge. The instant case is a discrimination and retaliation action pursuant to the provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. (“Title VII”) initially brought forth by the United States of America against the Municipality of Vega Alta (“the Municipality”) on behalf of Laura Molina (“Molin

137 Nev., Advance Opinion 4, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, No. 81024 INC., F/K/A SICOR, INC.; BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION; AND MCKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL, INC., Petitioners, FILED vs. THE EIGHT

STEINBERG, Judge: The appellant, Michael D. Cotant, through counsel, seeks review of an August 21, 2000, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) that denied his claim for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) service connection for degenerative joint disease (DJD) of the right hip. Record (R.) at 1-9. The appellant filed a brief and a reply brief, and the Secreta

DARRELL G. FISHER, ) ) Plaintiff/Appellee, ) ) Appeal No. ) 01-A-01-9609-CV-00402 VS. ) ) Davidson Circuit ) No. 94C-212 METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT ) OF NASHVILLE and DAVIDSON COUNTY,

RULING ON THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Victor A. Bolden, United States District Judge Plaintiff, Ohan Karagozian, has sued his former employer, Luxottica Retail North America (“Luxoticca”), alleging that he was terminated in retaliation for engaging in certain kinds of protected speech. Am. Compl., ECF No. 11. First, he claims that he. was-terminated for complaining about unlawful activity to