Cases

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-18-00676-CV IN RE ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and Latina Pruitt Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 Opinion by: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Rebec

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS [DKT. NOS. 7, 8, 10, 11] AND DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE IRENE M. KEELEY, District Judge. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Allstate”) brought this declaratory judgment action, seeking a determination of the parties’ rights and responsibilities under an insurance policy issued to Nathan Cogar (“Cogar”). Pendin

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: Hurricane Irene, characterized as a Category 1 hurricane when it hit the North Carolina coast on August 27, 2011, passed near the waterfront house of .Gary and Rebecca Woodson on the Albemarle Sound in Jarvisburg, North Carolina, flooding their property and, for several hours, subjecting the foundation of their house to wave action, allegedly causing subst

*389 [As amended by order of the Court of Appeals June 15, 2017.] Siddoway, J. ¶1 Anastasia Fortson-Kemmerer filed this lawsuit against her insurer, Allstate Insurance Company, alleging Allstate violated the Insurance Fair Conduct Act (IFCA), RCW 48.30.015, and acted in bad faith in

973 A.2d 1118 (2009) IRENE REALTY CORP. et al. v. TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA. No. 2008-147-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. June 5, 2009. *1119 Michael T. Sullivan, Esq., for Plaintiff. Michael R. DeLuca, Esq., Providence, for Defendant. Present: GOLDBERG, Acting C.J., and FLAHERTY, SUTTELL

OPINION Justice GOLDBERG, for the Court. This case came before the Supreme Court on November 29, 2012, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. The defendant, Jessica Ahlquist (Ahl-quist or defendant), appeals from a Superi- or Court grant of summary judgment

*644The plaintiff Raymond Azzato and a nonparty, Richard Pleas-ants, purchased certain real property located in East Islip (hereinafter the subject property), which was improved with a residence (hereinafter the subject dwelling). Azzato and his wife, the plaintiff Tricia Williamson, secured from the defendant insurance carrier a landlord’s package insurance policy (hereinafter the policy) covering

*644The plaintiff Raymond Azzato and a nonparty, Richard Pleas-ants, purchased certain real property located in East Islip (hereinafter the subject property), which was improved with a residence (hereinafter the subject dwelling). Azzato and his wife, the plaintiff Tricia Williamson, secured from the defendant insurance carrier a landlord’s package insurance policy (hereinafter the policy) covering

WILNER, J. We granted certiorari to determine whether the Maryland Insurance Commissioner properly approved a filing by Allstate Insurance Company and Allstate Indemnity Company (collectively Allstate) giving notice of its intent to cease writing new property insurance policies in certain geographic areas of the State. In a memorandum and order filed on his behalf by an

*705 MeMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Gerald Bohnenblust, 1 Personal Representative of the Estate of Mary Bohnen-blust, appeals from a final judgment entered in the District Court 2 for the Wes

Becker, J. ¶1 This appeal is a sequel to our earlier decision in Maple Court Seattle Condominium Ass’n v. Roosevelt, LLC, 139 Wn. App. 257, 265, 160 P.3d 1068 (2007). Roosevelt, a limited liability company that developed a condominium, settled a construction defect lawsuit brought by the condominium association. Roosevelt then brought third-party claims against the subcontractors, but

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING STATE AUTO’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DKT. NO. 25] AND DISMISSING THIS CASE WITH PREJUDICE IRENE M. KEELEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs Qi Feng Chen (“Chen”) and Grand China Buffet & Grill, Inc. (“Grand China”), filed a complaint in the Circuit Court of Harrison County, West Virginia, on June 17, 2016 (Dkt. No. 1-1), which, in part, sought a declar

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-18-00231-CV IN RE ACCEPTANCE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 Opinion by: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Dissenting Opinion by: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-18-00232-CV IN RE ACCEPTANCE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 Opinion by: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Dissenting Opinion by: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

977 P.2d 617 (1999) ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. Douglas BAUER and Jane Doe Bauer, Appellants. No. 22967-6-II. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2. May 14, 1999. Publication Ordered June 11, 1999. *619 Irene Margret Hecht, Keller Rohrback, Seattle, for Respondent. Wayne Clark Fricke, L

825 F.2d 1061 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Roger Eugene GREEN; Kevin Dion Green; Frank PrinceMiddlebrooks, Jr.; Frank Middlebrooks; IreneMiddlebrooks; Sheldon Murray; HerbertMurray and Wilma Murray,Defendants-Appellees. No. 86-1729. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued May 7, 1987.Decided Aug. 6, 1987

Madsen, J. (concurring) — I agree that the homeowner’s insurance policy exclusion at issue distinguishes between injury reasonably expected to result from an insured’s intentional acts and those reasonably expected to result from criminal acts. The policy’s plain language does not support Mr. Peasley’s claims that the exclusion is ambiguous and that injury resulting from unintentional criminal acts is not excluded from coverag

MURPHY, Chief Judge. This case comes to us from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, Maryland Code (1974, 1995 Repl.Vol.) §§ 12-601—12-609 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article. The question of state law certified for our determination is: Whether an insurance company has a duty to defend and/or

Heiman, J. The plaintiff, Allstate Insurance Company, appeals from the judgment of the trial court correcting, modifying, and partially vacating an arbitration award of underinsured motorist benefits. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) stacked1 the applicable insurance policy benefits of the defendant, Regina Link, in determining that the tortfeasor’s vehicle was under

DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On February 7, 2013, the Plaintiffs Eugene Ravasio and Mary Ravasio Revocable Trust commenced this action in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Suffolk against the Defendant Fidelity National Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Fidelity”), a Write-Your-Own (“WYO”) Program Carrier participating in the United States Government’s National Floo