Cases

[Cite as O'Neal v. O'Neal, 2022-Ohio-372.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA KATHLEEN PERRY O’NEAL, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 110114 v. : KENNETH JOSH O’NEAL, :

281 S.W.3d 330 (2009) Troy R. NEAL, Respondent, v. Alberta D. NEAL, Appellant. No. ED 90390. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One. March 17, 2009. *333 Michael P. Cohan, The Cohan Law Firm, LLC, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. *334 Deborah Benoit, Kruger & Benoit,

OPINION AND ORDER GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, District Judge. Before the court is the Motion to Decertify the Class [Dkt. # 558] filed by the defendants, members of the Oklahoma Commission for Human Services and the director of the Oklahoma Department of Human Services (“DHS”). In February 2008, nine Oklahoma foster children (“Named Plaintiffs”), acting through their next friends, file

594 F.Supp.2d 1273 (2009) D.G. by Next Friend G. Gail STRICKLIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. C. Brad HENRY, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Oklahoma, et al., Defendants. Case No. 08-CV-074-GKF-FHM. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. January 19, 2009. *1274 Andrew Belkin Bauer, Carly Henek, Mark A. Beckma

(2008) D.G. by Next Friend G. Gail STRICKLIN, et al., for themselves and those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. C. Brad HENRY, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Oklahoma, et al., Defendants. Case No. 08-CV-074-GKF-FHM. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. December 11, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, D

302 B.R. 275 (2003) In re Robert Gordon NEAL, Debtor. Connie L. Neal, Appellant. v. Robert Gordon Neal, Appellee. Nos. 03-6032, 03-6059MN. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Eighth Circuit. Submitted November 17, 2003. Filed December 12, 2003. *276 Connie L. Neal, New Ulm, Minnesota, pro se.

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: In March 1994, Consolidation Coal Company obtained the necessary government permit to “dewater” its Buchanan Mine, an underground coal mine in Buchanan Coun *633 ty, Virginia. It then began to pump the water from its mine into the nearby Beatrice Mine, an exhausted coal mine

08/22/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 15, 2025 Session SUSAN OAKES, ET AL. v. MARK A. FOX, M.D., ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Cumberland County No. CC1-2019-CV-6494 Michael S. Pemberton, Judge1 ___________

43 P.3d 359 (2002) 132 N.M. 8 2002-NMCA-037 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joel IRA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 21,375. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. January 24, 2002. Certiorari Denied April 4, 2002. *361 Patricia A. Madrid, Attorney General, James O.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.H.O.), entered April 24, 2006, which granted the motion of defendant Merrill Lynch & Co. pursuant to CPLR 3211 to dismiss the complaint in its entirety, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The unambiguous terms of defendant Merrill Lynch’s Financial Advisor Capital Award Accumulation Plan (FACAAP) provided Merrill Lynch with sole discretion to forfeit FACAAP awards when an employ

This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of a class of certified employees of the Macon County Board of Education represented by Lindsey Ray and William Brassfield. Rosie O'Neal and Cleta J. Martin represent a class of noncertified employees of that Board.1 We affirm. Interpretation of Act 83-575, Alabama Acts 1983 (providing for the establishment of a parimutuel racing facility in Macon County) is at issue in

461 B.R. 426 (2011) In re Karen Elaine NEAL, Debtor. Andrew W. Suhar, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Craig Bruno, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 09-40749. Adversary No. 10-4132. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio. December 9, 2011. *428 Frederic P. Schwieg, Attorney at Law, Rocky River, OH, for Plaintiff. Bruce Martin Broyle

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________ No. 03-6032 and No. 03-6059 MN In re: Robert Gordon Neal, * * Debtor. * * Connie L. Neal, * Appeal from the United States * Ban

OPINION WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: James Neal Lewis was convicted by a jury of one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1988), and two counts of conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1988) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1988). Ira Lee Dickerson was convicted by a jury of

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SUSAN K. LEE, United States Magistrate Judge. The Court ordered the parties to brief the issue of its subject matter jurisdiction over these related cases [4:ll-ev-60, Doc. 27; 4:ll-cv-61, Doc. 28]. In response, only Plaintiffs briefed the issue of subject matter jurisdiction [4:ll-ev-60, Doc. 28; 4:ll-cv-61, Doc. 29]. After considering the Plaintiffs’ arguments and the applic

805 So.2d 520 (2002) Antonio NEAL a/k/a Antonio L. Neal a/k/a Deano v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 2000-KA-01291-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. January 24, 2002. *522 Aelicia L. Thomas, Greenville, for Appellant. Office of the Attorney General by Dewitt T. Allred, III, for Appellee. Before PITTMAN, C.J., WALLER an

Rel: September 26, 2025 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS SPE

739 F.Supp.2d 1327 (2010) Larry HAUSLER, Plaintiff, v. H. Max FELTON, Defendant. No. 09-CV-483-TCK-TLW. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. September 13, 2010. James Ronald Bullard, Rebecca McCarthy Fowler, Doerner Saunders Daniel & Anderson, Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiff. Ira Leonard Edwards, Jr., Riggs Abney Neal Turpen Orbison & Lewis, Tulsa, O

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER SPATT, District Judge Presently before the Court is a motion by the Defendant Beazley Insurance Company, Inc. (the “Defendant”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 50 for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”). For the reasons set forth below, the Defendant’s motion is denied. I. BACKGROUND A. The Rel

767 N.E.2d 477 (2002) 328 Ill. App.3d 791 263 Ill.Dec. 26 Sylvia POULLETTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ira SILVERSTEIN, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1-01-0263. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fourth Division. March 21, 2002. *478 Patrick R. Grady, Peter Jacobsen, Wolf & Wol