Cases

Dismissing as moot the challenge to Executive Order No. 13,780, decision by published per curiam order. Judge Niemeyer concurred in part and dissented in part from the order dismissing as moot, in which Judge Shedd and Judge Agee joined. ORDER PER CURIAM: The Supreme Court held, by order dated October 10, .2017, that the appeal of ou

PER CURIAM. These cases involve challenges to Executive Order No. 13780, Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States. The order alters practices concerning the entry of foreign nationals *2083 into the United States by, among other things, suspending entr

MEMORANDUM OPINION THEODORE D. CHUANG, United States District Judge For the third time this year, President Donald J. Trump has issued an order banning the entry into the United States, with some exceptions, of nationals of multiple predominantly Muslim nations. At issue is whether this latest travel, ban should be enjoined by this Court because'it is the latest incarnatio

MEMORANDUM OPINION THEODORE D. CHUANG, United States District Judge On March 6, 2017, President Donald J. Trump issued an Executive Order which bars, with certain exceptions, the entry to the United States of nationals of six predominantly Muslim countries, suspends the entry of refugees for 120 days, and cuts by more than half the number of refugees to be admitted to the United States in the current year

BARBARA MILANO KEENAN, Circuit Judge, with whom JUDGE THACKER joins except as to Part II.A.L, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment: I concur in the majority opinion’s analysis with respect to its conclusions: (1) that the stated “national security purpose” of the Second Executive Order1 likely fails Mandel’s “bona fide” test and violates the Establishment C

THEODORE D. CHUANG, United States District Judge In 2017, President Donald J. Trump issued two Executive Orders temporarily *654banning the entry into the United States, with some exceptions, of nationals of multiple predominantly Muslim nations. These orders were followed by a Presidential Proclamation which extended the ban indefinitely as

The Supreme Court of the United States has vacated the judgment of this court and remanded for further consideration in light of Trump v. Hawaii , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 2392, 201 L.Ed.2d 775 (2018). In obedience to the man

THEODORE D. CHUANG, United States District Judge Defendants ("the Government") have filed a Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Resolution of Preliminary-Injunction Appeals ("Motion to Stay") seeking a stay of Case Nos. TDC-17-2921 and TDC-17-2969 pending the United States Supreme Court's resolution of Trump v. Hawaii , No. 17-965, --- U.S. ----,

TRAXLER, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I agree with my dissenting colleagues insofar as they hold that the plaintiffs lack standing to assert their claims under the Immigration and Nationality Act. Accordingly, I do not reach the merits of those claims. With regard to the plaintiffs' claim that Proclamation No. 9,645 likely violates the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution, I believe they have sta

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1990 INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, on behalf of itself and its clients; HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients; MIDDLE EAST STUDIES ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., on behalf of itself and its members; ARAB AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK, on behalf

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2231 INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself and its clients; HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients; JOHN DOES #1 & 3; JANE DOE #2; MIDDLE EAST STUDIES ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., on behalf of itself and its membe

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1351 INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself and its clients; HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients; MIDDLE EAST STUDIES ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., on behalf of itself and its members; MUHAMMED MET

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION TANYA WALTON PRATT, JUDGE, United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a) by Plaintiff Exodus Refugee Immigration, Inc. (“Exodus”). (Filing No. 6.) In late 2015, Indiana Governor Mike Pence (“Governor Pence”)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION AND LEGAL SERVICES, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 25-306 (RDM) v. KRISTI NOEM, Secretary of Homeland Security, in her official capacity, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION On J

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 25-5243 September Term, 2024 1:25-cv-00306-RDM Filed On: August 1, 2025 Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services, et al.,

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 899–942 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 21, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

21-1233 ACLU Immigrants’ Rts. Project v. ICE In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2021 No. 21-1233 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION IMMIGRANTS’ RIGHTS PROJECT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT,

463 F.Supp.2d 1049 (2005) HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT, et al. Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, et al. Defendants. No. CV 05-8047 ABC (RMCX). United States District Court, C.D. California. November 21, 2006. *1050 *1051 *1052 David Cole, Cen

535 F.3d 942 (2008) Luis Felipe CASAS-CASTRILLON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; Bill Lockyer, Attorney General; US Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees. No. 07-56261. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted January 7, 2008. Filed July 25, 2008. *944 James

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 3, 2025 Decided April 24, 2026 No. 25-5243 REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION AND LEGAL SERVICES, ET AL., APPELLEES v. MARKWAYNE MULLIN, SECRETARY OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, ET AL., APPELLANTS