Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “International Fidelity Insurance Company v. Hess Construction Company, Inc.”
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1662 ST. PAUL GUARDIAN INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. WALSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Cou
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1662 ST. PAUL GUARDIAN INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. WALSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Cou
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE G-NEW, INC. DBA GODIVA ) CHOCOLATIER, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N21C-10-100 MMJ CCLD ) ENDURANCE AMERICAN ) INSURANCE COMPANY, and ) NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE ) COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., ) ) Defendants. )
602 F.3d 237 (2010) HOWARD HESS DENTAL LABORATORIES INCORPORATED and Philip Guttierez d/b/a Dentures Plus, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Appellants v. DENTSPLY INTERNATIONAL, INC. Jersey Dental Laboratories, f/k/a Howard Hess Dental Laboratories Incorporated and Philip Guttierez, d/b/a Dentures Plus, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Appellants v. Dentsply International, Inc.; Accu
in Re Robinson Helicopter Company, Inc.public domain
FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, NO. CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TE
FIRST DIVISION December 14, 2009 No. 1-07-1798 STATEWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY and ) Appeal from the WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, ) Circuit Court of ) Cook County Plaintiffs-Appellees and Cross-Appellants,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-FC-01160-SCT AMERICAN COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY v. HECTOR RUIZ, DOING BUSINESS AS LOS PRIMOZ CONSTRUCTION; RAUL APARACIO; JESCO, INCORPORATED; AND APPALACHIAN UNDERWRITERS, INCORPORATED DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/12/2023 TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: CHRISTOPHER HAILEY CORKERN LAWRENCE MATTHEW QUINLIVAN MICHAEL WAYNE BAXTER
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE JESSICA STACY AND BRIAN STACY, ) No. ED108576 ) Respondents, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Louis County vs.
WIENER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant Weeks Marine, Inc.(‘Weeks”) appeals the district court’s order denying its motion for summary judgment and granting Defendant-Appel-lee Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company’s (“FFIC”) motion for summary judgment. We reverse and remand for entry of judgment in favor of Weeks. I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Hewlett-Packard Company v. Oracle Corporationpublic domain
Filed 6/14/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, H044371 (Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. 2011-1-CV-203163) v. ORACLE CORPORATION, Defendant and Appellant. Hewlett-Pack
Charlene Harper v. Vigilant Insurance Companypublic domain
COFFEY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant, Charlene Harper, acting in the capacity of administrator of Jane Doe’s (“Jane”) estate, appeals an order of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee Vigilant Insurance Company (“Vigilant”). The district court found that Jane, as an assignee of John Doe’s (“John”) rights to sue Vigilant for bad fai
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT C. CHAMBERS, CHIEF JUDGE Plaintiff CAMICO Mutual Insurance Company filed this declaratory action against Defendant Hess, Stewart & Campbell, PLLC., asking this Court to find it has no obligation to defend or indemnify Defendant for claims arising out of the activities of one of Defendant’s employees beyond a single $100,000 sub-limit in the policy. In Defenda
Spring Creek Exploration v. Hess Bakken Investmentpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 13, 2018 Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Aldin Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Hess Corp.public domain
FLYNN, J. *464 The plaintiff franchisee, Aldin Associates Limited Partnership, commenced this *686 three count action against the defendant franchisor, Hess Corporation,
NCR Corporation v. WTM I Companypublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 13-2447, 13-2522, 13-2568, 13-2570, 13-2572, 13-2605, 13- 2606, 13-2607, 13-2631, 13-2645, & 13-2866 NCR CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GEORGE A. WHITING PAPER COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT LONA LEANN GROSSHART, ) ) Appellant, ) v. ) WD83672 ) ) OPINION FILED: KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT ) April 13, 20
438 F.Supp.2d 696 (2006) TAYLOR PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION, INC., Plaintiff, v. DIRECTIONAL ROAD BORING, INC., David J. O'Leary, Hypower, Inc., and P.D.G. Electric Company, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 1:04-CV-599. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. April 26, 2006. *697 *698
Continental Insurance Companies v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical And Chemical Company, Inc.public domain
811 F.2d 1180 25 ERC 1521, 55 USLW 2417, 17 Envtl.L. Rep. 20,616 CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANIES, Appellee,v.NORTHEASTERN PHARMACEUTICAL AND CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC.,Milton Turkel, Edwin B. Michaels and John W. Lee,Appellees, State of Missouri,Intervenor-Appellant. No. 85-1940. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit.
McHUGH , Circuit Judge . Plaintiffs Spring Creek Exploration & Production Company, LLC ("Spring *1182 Creek") and Gold Coast Energy, LLC ("Gold Coast") appeal from four separate district court orders dismissing contract and tort claims a
This matter is before us on Plaintiffs-Appellants' Petition for Panel Rehearing ("Petition") and Defendants-Appellees' responses thereto. Upon careful consideration of the Petition and the responses, we grant the Petition in part to the extent of the modifications in the attached revised opinion. Our February 21, 2018 opinion is withdrawn and replaced by the attached revised opinion.