Cases

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment [dkts. 19 & 20]. The parties have fully briefed the motions. The Court finds that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the parties’ papers such that the decision process would not

Handwork, Presiding Judge. {¶ 1} In this appeal, No. WD-03-28, the Wood County Court of Common Pleas granted summary judgment to appellee, Vaughn Industries, Inc. (“Vaughn”), and denied the motion of appellant, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 8 (“IBEW”) for summary judgment. {¶ 2} In a second appeal, No. WD-03-048, Vaughn claims that the trial court abused its discretion

992 F.Supp. 162 (1996) BUILDING INDUSTRY FUND et al., Plaintiffs, v. LOCAL UNION NO. 3, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL — CIO et al., Defendants. No. 93 CV 2721. United States District Court, E.D. New York. February 8, 1996. Opinion on Reconsideration May 8, 1996. *163

203 F.3d 703 (9th Cir. 2000) BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY; SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 174, an OPINION unincorporated association; ROBERT A. HASEGAWA, an individual; ERIC SMITH, Defendants-Appellants. No. 97-35859 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Argued and Submitted

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: This case requires us to decide the breadth of the term “labor dispute” as defined by the Norris-LaGuardia Act, 29 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. The union in this case threatened to picket a railroad unless the railroad agreed to subcontract work only to subcontractors who employ the union’s members. We must decide whether the union and the railroad were engaged in a labor dispute. The district cour

OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced action, seeking damages and a declaratory judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 57, that it has an enforceable labor contract1 with Defendant International Union of Operating Engineers (“IUOE”), Local 450 (“Local 450”) and that Loca

23 F.Supp.2d 771 (1998) IRON WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 17 INSURANCE FUND and its Trustees, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants. No. 1:97-CV-1422. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. September 10, 1998. As Amended September 21, 1998. *772

314 F.2d 886 John E. PARKS, Jr., and Robert M. Foote and Albert McHugh and Paul Ziegler and Silvio Stamerro, Individually and as Representatives of the members of Local 28, I.B.E.W., in a Class Action, and Local Union 28, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Appellees and Cross-Appellants,v.INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, Appellant and Cross-Appellee.Local Union No. 24 (IBEW), Intervenor.

SOBELOFF, Chief Judge. A dispute between an international union and one of its component local unions which led to the revocation of the local’s charter and the establishment of a new local embracing its jurisdiction, occasioned two suits against the international. One was brought by the local union and the other by five of its members in behalf of the membership, both suits seeking declaratory judgments and injunctive relie

203 F.Supp. 288 (1962) John E. PARKS, Jr., et al., individually and as representatives of the members of Local 28, IBEW, in a class action, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS. LOCAL UNION 28, IBEW v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS. Civ. Nos. 13235, 13359. United States District Court D. Maryland. March 7, 1962. Suppl

463 F.Supp. 388 (1978) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. SHEET METAL WORKERS, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, LOCAL NO. 122, Defendant. Civ. A. No. M-74-3. United States District Court, D. Maryland. November 24, 1978. *389 *390 *391

Opinion for the Court filed by EDWARDS, STARR and D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This case involves a class action brought by eight black construction workers alleging racial discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (1982) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1982). The plaintiffs charged

*426Justice Brennan announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II, III, and VI, and an opinion with respect to Parts IV, V, and VII in which Justice Marshall, Justice Blackmun, and Justice Stevens join. In 1975, petitioners were found guilty of engaging in a pattern and practice of discrimination a

690 F.2d 489 111 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2787, 112 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2525,95 Lab.Cas. P 13,877,1982-83 Trade Cases 65,021,3 Employee Benefits Ca 2273 CARPENTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 1846 OF the UNITED BROTHERHOOD OFCARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, etal., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.PRATT-FARNSWORTH, INC.; Halmar, Inc.; Associated GeneralContractors of Louisiana, Inc., At-Large District; andAs

431 U.S. 324 (1977) INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS v. UNITED STATES ET AL. No. 75-636. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 10, 1977. Decided May 31, 1977.[*] CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. *327 L. N. D. Wells, Jr., argued the cause for

210 F.3d 18 (1st Cir. 2000) BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS, UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION, PLAINTIFFS, APPELLEES,v.SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY, AROOSTOOK AND BANGOR RESOURCES, INC., DEFENDANTS, APPELLANTS. No. 99-1328 United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Heard October 8, 1999Decided April 5, 2000

886 F.2d 871 50 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1627,51 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,359, 58 USLW 2193,14 O.S.H. Cas.(BNA) 1217,1989 O.S.H.D. (CCH) P 28,673 INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE ANDAGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, UAW, etal., Plaintiffs-Appellants,andLocal 322, Allied Industrial Workers of America, AFL-CIO,Intervening Plaintiff-Appellant,v.JOHNSON CONTROLS, IN

561 F.2d 1223 96 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2057, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,141,82 Lab.Cas. P 10,094 John DANIEL, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS,WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, et al.,Defendants-Appellants. No. 76-1855. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Heard April 4, 1977.

944 F.2d 1047 137 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2781, 119 Lab.Cas. P 10,918 EICHLEAY CORPORATION,v.INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL ANDORNAMENTAL IRON WORKERS; United Brotherhood of Carpentersand Joiners of America; Laborers International Union ofNorth America; Operative Plasterers and Cement MasonsInternational Association of the United States and Canada;International Union of Operating

709 F.2d 815 113 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2868, 113 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3311,97 Lab.Cas. P 10,232,4 Employee Benefits Ca 1947 HOTEL AND RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES AND BARTENDERS INTERNATIONALUNION LOCAL 54; and Frank Gerace, President Hoteland Restaurant Employees and BartendersInternational Union Local 54andInternational Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs,Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Local 331,