Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Southwest Airlines Co.”
Sw. Airlines Co. v. Roundpipe, LLCpublic domain
A. JOE FISH, Senior United States District Judge Before the court is the motion of the defendants Roundpipe, LLC ("Roundpipe"), Chase Roberts ("Roberts"), and Pavel Yurevich ("Yurevich") (collectively, "the defendants") to dismiss counts one and six of the plaintiff Southwest Airline Company ("Southwest")'s complaint pursuant to the Texas Citizens Participation Act ("TCPA") and to dismiss the entirety of Southwest's complaint pursua
Carotek, Inc. v. Kobayashi Ventures, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge. Plaintiffs Carotek, Inc. (“Carotek”) and Event Capturing Systems, Inc. (“ECS”) filed separate actions, now consolidated, seeking, inter alia, a declaratory judgment that three patents owned by defendant Kobayashi Ventures, LLC (“Kobayashi”) are invalid and unenforceable, and monetary relief based on unfair trade practices, interference with prospec
471 B.R. 510 (2012) In re DEMAY INTERNATIONAL LLC, Debtor. GSL of Ill, LLC, Appellant, v. McCaffety Electric Company, Appellee. Bankruptcy Case No. 09-35759-H4-11. Civil Action No. H-10-2128. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 30, 2012. *513 Peter Johnson, Law Offices of Peter Johnson, Houston,
Ecoservices, LLC v. Certified Aviation Servs., LLCpublic domain
RONALD S.W. LEW, Senior U.S. District Judge Currently before the Court is Defendant Certified Aviation Services, LLC's ("Defendant") Motion for Judgment of Patent Ineligibility of the '262 Patent [271]; Defendant's Motion for Judgment of Patent Indefiniteness of the '860 Patent [273]; Plaintiff EcoServices, LLC's ("Plaintiff") Motion for Permanent Injunction [275]; Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees [272]; and Plaintiff's Motion
ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Level 3 Communications LLC III v. Dept. of Rev.public domain
440 October 25, 2019 No. 21 IN THE OREGON TAX COURT REGULAR DIVISION LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. (TC 5236) Plaintiff (taxpayer) sought a reduction in the real market value of
Halo Management, LLC v. Interland, Inc.public domain
308 F.Supp.2d 1019 (2003) HALO MANAGEMENT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. INTERLAND, INC., Defendants. No. C-03-1106 MHP. United States District Court, N.D. California. November 17, 2003. *1020 *1021 *1022 *1023
OPINION HORN, Judge. FINDINGS OF FACT This opinion relates to four consolidated cases filed by the same plaintiff, Gulf Group General Enterprises Co. W.L.L. (Gulf Group), in the United States Court of Federal Claims. 1 The eases arise from four
ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV
John T. Preston and C Change Investments, LLC v. Emjo Investments, Ltd. and H.J. Von Der Goltzpublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-15-00390-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 9:25:40 PM
Ivan Jimenez v. Department of Homeland Securitypublic domain
USCA11 Case: 23-10073 Document: 73-1 Date Filed: 10/15/2024 Page: 1 of 35 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10073 ____________________ IVAN JIMENEZ, JUAN MACHADO, JOSE MUNOZ,
SARA L. ELLIS, United States District Judge OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff MG Design Associates, Corp. (“MG”) thought that it was going to design and build a tradeshow exhibit for Defendants CoStar Realty Information, Inc. (“CoStar”) and Apartments, LLC d/b/a Apartments.com (“Apartments”) (collectively the “CoStar Defendants”), but, after MG designed the exhibit, the CoStar Defendants took MG’s designs an
Tamburo v. Dworkinpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER JOAN B. GOTTSCHALL, District Judge. The essential facts in this 2004 case are undisputed. Defendant Kristen Henry, a dog breeder and computer programmer, spent almost five years creating an extensive database of dog pedigrees, which she made freely available for use by fellow breeders through her web site. Plaintiffs John Tamburo and Versity Corporation (‘Versity”
Hiq Labs, Inc. v. Linkedin Corporationpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HIQ LABS, INC., No. 17-16783 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:17-cv-03301-EMC LINKEDIN CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION On Remand from the United States Supreme Court Argued and Submitted October 18,
Hiq Labs, Inc. v. Linkedin Corporationpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HIQ LABS, INC., No. 17-16783 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:17-cv-03301-EMC LINKEDIN CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Braidwood Management v. EEOCpublic domain
Case: 22-10145 Document: 00516793373 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED June
Page v. Comeypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CARTER PAGE, Plaintiff, v. No. 20-cv-3460 (DLF) JAMES B. COMEY et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION As part of its investigation into the alleged connection between the Trump 2016 presidential campaign and the Russian government, the Federal Bu
Grynberg v. BP P.L.C.public domain
ORDER DAVID HITTNER, District Judge. Pending before the Court are the Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and for Insufficiency of Service of Process, or in the Alternative, to Quash Service filed by Peter Sutherland and Lord John Browne, The BP Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint, and the Motion to Dismiss of Statoil, ASA. Having co
Wharf, Inc. v. District of Columbiapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THE WHARF, INC. t/a THE WHARF, et al., Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, v. THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Civil Action No. 15-1198 (CKK) Defendants, and WHARF HORIZONTAL REIT LEASEHOLDER LLC, et al., Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. MEMORANDUM
MDS (Canada) Inc. v. Rad Source Technologies, Inc.public domain
PER CURIAM: This appeal presents a jurisdictional issue of first impression in our Court: whether the Federal Circuit has exclusive jurisdiction to hear an appeal of a breach *838of contract claim that would require the resolution of a claim of patent infringement for the complainant to succeed. We conclude that this Court does have appellate jurisdiction. We then add