Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Integrated Pipe & Supply, LLC v. Critical Path Resources, Inc.”
Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM, ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION PAUL W. GRIMM, United States Chief Magistrate Judge. This Memorandum, Order and Recommendation addresses Plaintiffs Motion For Terminating And Other Sanctions Arising Out Of Defendants’ Intentional Destruction Of Evidence And Other Litigation Misconduct (“Pl.’s Mot.”), ECF1 No. 341, which Plaintiff Victor Stanley, Inc. (“VSI”) fi
SD3, LLC v. Black & Decker Inc.public domain
ON REHEARING PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1746 SD3, LLC; SAWSTOP LLC, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC.; BLACK & DECKER CORPORATION; CHANG TYPE INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.; DELTA POWER EQUIPMENT CORP.; HITACHI KOKI CO., LTD.; HITACHI KOKI USA LTD.; MAKITA CORPORATION; MAKITA U.
SD3, LLC v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.public domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1746 SD3, LLC; SAWSTOP LLC, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC.; BLACK & DECKER CORPORATION; CHANG TYPE INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.; DELTA POWER EQUIPMENT CORP.; HITACHI KOKI CO., LTD.; HITACHI KOKI USA LTD.; MAKITA CORPORATION; MAKITA U.S.A., INC.; MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORP.; O
Maverick Constructors, LLCpublic domain
DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. The decision issued on the date below is subject to an ASBCA Protective Order. This version has been approved for public release. ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of - ) ) Maverick Constructors, LLC ) ASBCA No. 61989 ) Under Contract No. W912E
Moody v. NetChoice, LLCpublic domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 603 U. S. Part 1 Pages 707–798 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT July 1, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are r
Meltech Corporation, Inc.public domain
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of - ) ) Meltech Corporation, Inc. ) ASBCA Nos. 61766, 61767, 61872 ) Under Contract No. W912DR-14-D-0021 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Leonard A. Sacks, Esq. Leonard A. Sacks & Associates, P.C.
Parsons Evergreene, LLCpublic domain
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) Parsons Evergreene, LLC ) ASBCA No. 58634 ) Under Contract No. FA8903-04-D-8703 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Douglas S. Oles, Esq. James F. Nagle, Esq.
United States of America v. Google LLCpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-3010 (APM) ) GOOGLE LLC,
Loomis v. Amazon.com LLCpublic domain
Filed 4/26/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT KISHA LOOMIS, B297995 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. BC632830) AMAZON.COM LLC, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the
Reynaldo Gonzalez v. Google LLCpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT REYNALDO GONZALEZ; THE No. 18-16700 ESTATE OF NOHEMI GONZALEZ; BEATRIZ GONZALEZ, Individually D.C. No. and as Administrator of the Estate 4:16-cv-03282- of Nohemi Gonzalez; JOSE DMR HERNANDEZ; REY GONZALEZ; PAUL GONZALEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GOOGLE LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the Unit
Reynaldo Gonzalez v. Google LLCpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT REYNALDO GONZALEZ; THE No. 18-16700 ESTATE OF NOHEMI GONZALEZ; BEATRIZ GONZALEZ, Individually D.C. No. and as Administrator of the Estate 4:16-cv-03282- of Nohemi Gonzalez; JOSE DMR HERNANDEZ; REY GONZALEZ; PAUL GONZALEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GOOGLE LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the Unit
Skedco, Inc. v. Strategic Operations, Inc.public domain
HERNANDEZ, District Judge: Plaintiff Skedco, Inc. brings this action against Defendant Strategic Operations, Inc., alleging that Defendant infringes Claims 18, 19, and 20 of United States Patent No. 8,342,652 ("the '852 Patent") which discloses a system for simulating hemorrhages in the training of first responders.1 The United States, through the Secretary of the Army, owns the '852 Patent. Plaintiff is
GSC Construction, Inc.public domain
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of -- ) ) GSC Construction, Inc. ) ASBCA Nos. 59402, 59601 ) Under Contract No. W9126G-11-D-0061 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Karl Dix, Jr., Esq. Lochlin B. Samples, Esq.
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Sierra Clubpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1971 MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC, Petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; MICHAEL S. REGAN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality; S. DANIEL SMITH, in his official capacity a
Focus Financial Financial Partners, LLC v. Holsopplepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE FOCUS FINANCIAL PARTNERS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0188-JTL ) SCOTT HOLSOPPLE, and HIGHTOWER ) HOLDINGS, LLC, )
Veterans Technology LLC v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 16-1489 Filed: May 9, 2018 PUBLIC VERSION* ************************************* 5 U.S.C. § 706 (Administrative Procedure Act, * Scope of Judicial Review); VETERANS TECHNOLOGY, LLC, * 15 U.S.C. §§ 631, 633 (Small Business Act);
Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 13-465C (Filed Under Seal: December 6, 2019) (Reissued for Publication: December 13, 2019) ∗ (Reissued Following Motion to Certify Interlocutory Appeal: March 9, 2020) ** ************************************* FAIRHOLME FUNDS, INC. et al., * Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(1); RCFC
PPL Energyplus, LLC v. Nazarianpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION MARVIN J. GARBIS, District Judge. The Court has heard the evidence, reviewed the exhibits, considered the materials submitted by the parties, and had the benefit of the arguments of counsel. The Court now issues this Memorandum of Decision as its findings of fact and conclusions of law in compliance with Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 13-465C (Filed Under Seal: December 6, 2019) (Reissued for Publication: December 13, 2019) ************************************* FAIRHOLME FUNDS, INC. et al., * Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(1); RCFC *
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS