⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

6 opinions for “Integral Wireless Technologies LLC v. MW International Ventures LLC”

Aspire Power Ventures, LP v. Public Utility Commission of Texas, Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Thomas Gleeson, Lori Cobos, Jimmy Glotfelty, Kathleen Jackson, and Courtney Hjaltmanpublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2024-12-18 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-24-00118-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →
Twilio, Inc. v. Telesign Corp.public domain
District Court, N.D. California · 2017-04-17 · Published · cited 14× · 249 F. Supp. 3d 1123; 2017 WL 1374759; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58482
ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 31 LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiff Twiilio, Inc. (“Twilio” or “Plaintiff’) filed a patent infringement suit against Defendant Telesign Corporation (“Telesign” or “Defendant”) and alleged that Defendant infringed the claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,306,021 (“the ’021 Patent”), 8,837,465 (“the ’465 Patent”
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · company profile: Telesign Corp. → · find the judge →
Cedar Hill, Inc. v. Universal Packaging, Inc., and John C. Wyliepublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-05-27 · Published · cited 0×
Case 15-32077 Document 1 Filed in TXSB on 04/13/15 Page 1 of 72 ‘W-"'3' United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District ofTexas
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →
MALOUFF, CHARLES ANTHONY Jr.public domain
Texas Supreme Court · 2015-12-21 · Published · cited 0×
.,'§Z.L_§PG§N:> 131‘@z TE;~>§ 1 .11§12- Sz;+~'z §~~C)§. _`{9.12 %\01452 _ ' IAFULC@_|&§ mlTI.-¢€ Z\€CE»W\EAL__ ‘§_\1\5“41€.*’13(€;14§ §1)?( yi$b§'h~\c§ T'H§ \)4121‘.W_\\s§ ‘Tco C§>MP§ '\’H€ :1#1:1111213601
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →
Entergy Texas, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas, Office of Public Utility Counsel, and State of Texas Agencies and Institutions of Higher Educationpublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-02-06 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 4055487 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →
Entergy Texas, Inc.// Office of Public Utility Counsel and Public Utility Commission of Texas v. Public Utility Commission of Texas and Texas Industrial Energy Consumers// Office of Public Utility Counsel and Entergy Texas, Inc.public domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-03-31 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00735-CV 4703327 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →