Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
8 opinions for “Ingrassia v. Blake”
Thomas Ingrassia v. Carol Dicknettepublic domain
BENTON, Circuit Judge. Thomas J. Ingrassia, a civilly-committed individual, sued Carol A. Dickneite, Jay W. Englehart, Alan W. Blake, Beth Weinkein and Mary Beth Rowe, alleging a violation of his constitutional right to adequate nutrition under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court denied defendants qualified immunity. They appeal. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this
Cardona v. Padillapublic domain
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
People v. Thorpepublic domain
*559OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. Judgment of conviction reversed on the law and facts and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, fine and surcharge remitted and simplified trafile information dismissed. In answer to the defendant’s assertion in his affidavit of errors that his constitutional right to a speedy trial had bee
Sewak v. Lockhartpublic domain
HUDOCK, Judge. In these cross-appeals both parties allege error with regard to the judgment entered in favor of Michael and Patricia Sewak (Buyers) and against Charles J. and Hope Lockhart (Sellers) in a fraud action involving the sale of a home. Sellers ask this Court to reverse the trial court’s denial of their motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and *758
ORDER AND REASONS MARTIN L.C. FELDMAN, District Judge. Before the Court is the plaintiffs motion for preliminary and permanent injunction. For the reasons that follow, the motion is GRANTED. *565 Background This litigation arises out of a constitutional challenge to a Louisiana campaign fi
Benner v. St. Paul Pub. Sch.public domain
SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, United States District Judge This case aptly illustrates the adage that there are always "two sides to every story." On the one hand, Plaintiff Aaron Benner ("Benner") claims that, after he (a tenured African-American elementary school teacher) spoke against Defendant St. Paul Public Schools' ("SPPS") "racial equity policy" during a widely-covered May 2014 school board meeting, SPPS worked with his new Principa
Coleman v. Schwarzeneggerpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER STEPHEN REINHARDT, Circuit Judge, LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge, THELTON E. HENDERSON, Senior District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION......................................................887 II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND........................889 A. Plata (Medical Care)...........
United States v. Bp Products North America Inc.public domain
610 F.Supp.2d 655 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA INC. Criminal No. H-07-434. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 12, 2009. *659 Abe Martinez, Stephen Mark McIntyre, Financial Litigation, Office of US Attorney, US Marshal-H, US Pretrial SVCS-H, US Probation-H, Houston, TX