Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
12 opinions for “Ingle v. Berryhill”
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Kellie A. Ouellette, Claimant Case No. 17-cv-409-SM v. Opinion No. 2018 DNH 124 Nancy A. Berryhill, Deputy Commissioner For Operations, Performing the duties and functions not reserved to the Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant O R D E R Pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
641 S.E.2d 266 (2007) COVINGTON SQUARE ASSOCIATES, LLC v. INGLES MARKETS, INC. No. A07A0332. Court of Appeals of Georgia. January 12, 2007. Reconsideration denied January 26, 2007. *267 Michael A. Kessler, Cumming, for Appellant. Samuel Robinson Arden, Jill Rhodes Johnson, Atlanta, for Appellee. BLA
310 Ga. 32 FINAL COPY S19G1491. PREMIER HEALTH CARE INVESTMENTS, LLC v. UHS OF ANCHOR, L.P. WARREN, Justice. In 2005, the Georgia Department of Community Health (“the Department”) promulgated a rule, commonly known as the “Psychiatric Rule” (“the Rule”), that requires hospitals to obtain a Certificate of Need (“CON”) “prior to the establishment of a new or the expansion of an existing acute care adult psychiatric and/or substance abuse inpatient program,”
Dillard, Chief Judge. *415 *29 In this discretionary appeal, UHS of Anchor, L.P. d/b/a Southern Crescent Behavioral Health System ("Southern Crescent") appeals from the trial court's order denying a
Holladay v. Speedpublic domain
208 S.W.3d 408 (2005) N. Victoria HOLLADAY v. Charles SPEED, et al. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, at Jackson. October 14, 2005. December 28, 2005. Application for Permission to Appeal Denied August 21, 2006. *409 Robert E. Craddock, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, N. Victoria Holladay.
Bardin v. Planning Department of the County of Kauaipublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 29-SEP-2023 08:04 AM Dkt. 124 OP IN THE INTE
MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. I. In the early 1980s, following the breakup of AT & T, the Federal Communications Commission required local telephone companies, or local exchange carriers (“LECs”), to provide long-distance companies, also called interexehange carriers (“IXCs”), with access to local exchange facilities at a
Andrew Mays v. Deborah Mayspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 27, 2001 Session ANDREW LEE MAYS v. DEBORAH JANE ROGERS MAYS Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. 156204-5 R.D. Kay S. Robilio, Judge No. W2000-03067-COA-R3-CV - Filed February 5, 2002 This is a divorce and child custody case. Husband sued for divorce, and W
138 F.3d 746 11 Communications Reg. (P&F) 998 SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Petitioner,Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies, Intervenor on Petition,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States ofAmerica, Respondents,New Valley Corporation, f/k/a Western Union, Intervenor on Petition. No. 97-3446. United States Court of Appeals,Ei
McGowan v. Statepublic domain
990 So.2d 931 (2003) James William McGOWAN v. STATE. CR-95-1775. Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. Opinion Affirming on Return to Remand July 8, 2005. December 12, 2003. Rehearing Denied November 23, 2005. Certiorari Denied February 22, 2008 Alabama Supreme Court 1050293. *942
Griffin v. Statepublic domain
790 So.2d 267 (1999) Louis GRIFFIN v. STATE. CR-97-1026. Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. December 10, 1999. Opinion on Return to Remand February 4, 2000. Rehearing Denied March 31, 2000. *278 J.T. Simonetti, Jr., Birmingham, for appellant. Bill Pryor, atty. gen.; and Jeremy W. Armstr
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Pruittpublic domain
The parties to this action will be designated as in the trial court. W.H. Pruitt, as plaintiff, instituted this action in the district court of Pottawatomie county, Okla., against the Chicago, Rock Island Pacific Railway Company, for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by him while in the employ of the defendant company. The plaintiff's petition charged, in substance, that while in the employ of the defendant company, in the capacity of truckman helper, he was injur