Cases

MICHEL, Circuit Judge. Cervecería Centroamericana, S.A. (Cen-troamericana) appeals the decision, dated January 12, 1989, of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), granting Cer-vecería India, Inc.’s (India’s) petition to cancel Centroamericana’s Registration No. 972,984 for the word mark MEDALLA DE ORO, for beer, on the grounds of abandonment. See Cerveceria India Inc. v. C

30 P.3d 649 (2001) 200 Ariz. 582 STATE of Arizona ex rel. David A.PENNARTZ, Scottsdale City Attorney, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Joseph OLCAVAGE, Judge of the Scottsdale City Court, Respondent Judge, Gerald J. Adair, Stacy M. Aeed, Ryan Bettes, Scott T. Castle, India E. Franks, Danielle Larkin, Carolyn S. Porter, Randall C. Urbom, Real Party in Interest. No. 1 CA-SA 01-0130.

Scudder, P.J., and Smith, J. (dissenting in part). We respectfully dissent in part and would affirm the judgment because we cannot agree with the majority that the sentence imposed by County Court is so unduly harsh and severe as to warrant our interference with the court’s sentencing discretion. The record establishes that, in September 2006, defendant was sentenced to four months of intermittent incarceration and to five years

*32SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Alkeshkumar Gopleshkumar Shah, a native and citizen of India, seeks review of an August 3, 2004 order of the BIA affirming the January 22, 2004 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Michael Roceo denying Shah’s application for cancellation of removal pursuant to Immigration and Nationality Act § 240A(a), 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a). In re Shah, Alkeshkumar Gop

362 B.R. 542 (2007) In re Daniel J. HAHN, Jr. and Yadira Ordonez Hahn, Debtors. Deobrah Menotte, Trustee, Plaintiff. v. Daniel J. Hahn, Jr. and Yadira Ordonez Hahn, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 05-38506-BKC-PGH, Adversary No. 06-1492-BKC-PGH-A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida, West Palm Beach Division. February 22, 2007.

FOURTH DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., MERCIER and PINSON, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules January 21, 2022

06/03/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 5, 2019 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE, EX REL. ROBBIE B. V. SIVA M. Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Davidson County No. PT232436, 2017-3686 Sheila D. J. Callowa

Paul A. Engelmayer, United States District Judge In 1993, a group of individuals from countries including Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Panama filed a putative class action in Texas state court against a number of *522chemical manufacturers including, among others, the defendant here, Occidental Chemical Corp. ("Occidental"). The plaintiffs had all

Per CURIAM. Defendant appeals as of right his jury-trial convictions of first-degree felony murder, MCL 750.316(l)(b); safe breaking, MCL 750.531; breaking and entering a building with intent to commit a larceny, MCL 750.110, and assaulting, resisting, or obstructing a police officer, MCL 750.81d. Defendant was sentenced as a fourth-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.12, to a prison term of life without parole for the felony-murd

433 B.R. 419 (2010) In re LAKETOWN WHARF MARKETING, CORPORATION, n/k/a Laketown Wharf Marketing, LLC, Debtor. Corus Construction Venture, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Laketown Wharf Marketing Corporation, et al., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 08-40692-LMK. Adversary No. 09-04009-LMK. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division. July 19, 2010.

ORDER After Edward Hospital fired Hemagini Pandya in 1996, she sued it under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 et seq., for national-origin discrimination. The case went to trial before a jury, and at the end of the plaintiffs case in chief, Edward Hospital moved for judgment as a matter of law under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(a). The district court granted the motion, and we affirm. Pandya, a native of

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CITY OF CORAL SPRINGS POLICE ) OFFICERS’ PENSION PLAN, derivatively ) on behalf of BLOCK, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0091-KSJM ) JACK DORSEY, ROELOF BOTHA, AMY ) BROOKS, PAUL DEIGHTON, RANDY ) GARUTTI, JIM MCKELVEY, MARY

MAY, J. An insurer appeals a jury verdict in an uninsured motorist case. It argues the trial court erred in denying its motions for new trial and remittitur. We agree and reverse. An uninsured motorist rear-ended the plaintiffs vehicle. When the plaintiffs insurer did not tender its uninsured motorist coverage upon demand, the plaintiff filed a complaint against the insurer. The insurer admitted the exist

Blaokford, J. This was a suit brought by Tense F. Massey against Thomas Ruble. The suit was commenced on the 30th of October, 1847, before a justice of the peace. A bond, of which the following is the substance, was filed as the cause of action: Whereas, William Ruble has been arrested and is now in custody at the suit of Tense F. Massey, on a writ of ne exeat

MEMORANDUM MCHUGH, United States District Court Judge This case arises out of a physical altercation between two employees, one of whom was not only terminated but was *205ultimately found guilty of criminal charges as a result of his conduct. Plaintiff contends that the outburst resulting in his discharge- and conviction was the product of a racia

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I

HAGEL, Judge: Phillip G. Cline appeals through counsel a July 1, 2010, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision that granted entitlement *19to an initial disability rating of 70%, but no higher, for post-traumatic stress disorder, effective May 6, 1999, but no earlier.1 Mr. Cline’s Notice of Appeal was timely, and the Court has jurisdictio

DYK, Circuit Judge. Cordis Corporation appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granting Abbott Laboratories’ motion to quash two subpoenas duces tecum issued pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 24. We conclude that section 24 only empowers a district court to issue a subpoena for use in a “contested case,” and

OPINION FRY, Judge. This case involves a dispute over the division of the community estate of Harbhajan Singh Khalsa Yogiji, more commonly known as Yogi Bhajan, deceased, and his wife, Defendant Inderjit Kaur Puri, whom the parties refer to as Bibiji. Yogi Bhajan was a spiritual and religious leader of the Sikh religion in the United States. Before Yogi Bhajan’s death,

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MELBOURNE MUNICIPAL ) FIREFIGHTERS’ PENSION TRUST ) FUND, derivatively on behalf of ) QUALCOMM, INCORPORATED, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) PAUL E. JACOBS; STEVEN M. ) MOLLENKOPF; BARB