Cases

KELLY, Circuit Judge. From 2012 to 2014, Nathan C. McGuire was the head varsity girls’ basketball coach at Woodbury High School, a public school within Independent School District No. 833 (the District) in Woodbury,'Minne-sota. In March 2014, the South Washington County School Board (the School Board) decided not to renew McGuire’s coaching contract for the following school year. McGuire brought suit, alleging that the Distr

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD H. KYLE, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION When Independent School District No. 833 (“the District”) decided not to renew Nathan McGuire’s contract to coach the varsity girls’ basketball team at Woodbury High School, he sued the District, its Superintendent, Keith Jacobus, and its Director of Human Resources, Denise Griffith (collectivel

OSCN Found Document:INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT # 52 v. HOFMEISTER INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT # 52 v. HOFMEISTER2020 OK 56Case Number: 117081Decided: 06/23/2020THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2020 OK 56, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT

FILED Appellate Case: 20-1372 Document: 010110716025 United States CourtPage: Date Filed: 07/26/2022 of Appeals 1 Tenth Circuit July 26, 2022

McHUGH, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This appeal arises from allegations that AKC, a child with autism, suffered abuse at school by her special-education teacher, Vickie Cantrell. AKC’s parents, Ted and Bella Carroll, filed suit in federal district court against Ms. Cantrell, the school district, and others, seeking damages under the Americans with

OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court is Defendant Houston Independent School District’s (“HISD”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss”). Doc. 13. Having considered the motion, the response, the facts in the record, and the applicable law, the Court grants the motion and denies Plaintiffs’ request for additional time to re

465 N.W.2d 692 (1991) In the Matter of the Placement on Unrequested Leave of Terrill FREDRICH, Relator, v. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 720, Respondent. No. C1-90-1577. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. February 5, 1991. Review Denied April 29, 1991. *693 Harley M. Ogata, Christina L. Clark, Minnesota Educ. Ass'n

ORDER VANESSA D. GILMORE, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendant Houston Independent School District (“Defendant”)’s motion for summary judgment (Instrument No. 12). I. A. On October 31, 2013, Plaintiff Cynthia Franklin (“Plaintiff’) filed suit against Defendant Houston Independent School District (“HISD,” or “Defendant”

OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause, seeking overtime compensation for “extra” work that Plaintiffs Harold Ford (“Ford”) and Joffery Reid, Jr. (“Reid”) performed, allegedly willfully denied in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201(a)(1) et seq., is Defendant the Houston Independent School

Opinion filed January 19, 2023 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-21-00142-CV __________ TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL BOARDS RISK MANAGEMENT FUND, Appellant V. COLORADO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee On Appeal from the 32nd Dis

Appellate Case: 25-8039 Document: 43-1 Date Filed: 05/04/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 4, 2026

MATHESON, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs are, or at all relevant times were, high school students from Ros *29 well, New Mexico, who belong to a religious group called “Relentless” (“Plaintiffs”). 1 They sued Roswell Independent School District

McEvers, Justice. *446 [¶ 1] The parents of nine minor children, individually and as guardians of the children, appeal from a district court judgment determining the statutory damage cap for tort claims against a political subdivision is constitutional. The parents argue the damage cap vio

OPINION AND ORDER Michael H. Simon, District Judge. In this case, a former elementary school teacher is suing the school district where she previously worked, as well as several district administrators, employees, and school board members. She also is suing a private company that is co-owned by the chair of the school board. Plaintiffs school district held an in-service workday for teachers on April 26

341 F.Supp.2d 1070 (2004) EDUCATION MINNESOTA LAKEVILLE, Lakeville Education Assistants Federation, Marsha McDowall and Sheri Brown, Plaintiffs, v. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 194 and Lakeville Public Schools, Defendants. No. 04-4488 (RHK/JSM). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. October 20, 2004. Harley M. Ogata, Education Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota

745 F.Supp.2d 700 (2010) KLEIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant and Texas Education Agency, Defendant, v. Per HOVEM, Knut Hovem and Signe Hovem, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. Civil Action No. H-09-137. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. September 27, 2010. *703 Jeffrey L. Roge

OPINION AND ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge. Before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion for prehminary injunction (Dkt. No. 4). Blytheville School District No. 5 (the “Blytheville District”) responded to the motion, as directed by the Court (Dkt. No. 16). On June 17, 2013, the Court entered an order requesting additional briefing by the parties and directed the Blytheville District to respo

OPINION ANDERSON, PAUL H„ Justice. Appellant Jackie Lennartson retained the law firm of Gregg M. Corwin and Associates to represent her in a sexual harassment action against her former employer, the Anoka Hennepin Independent School District No. 11. The school district retained the law firm of Rider, Bennett, Egan & Arundel, LLP (Rider Bennett) to assist in its defense. Susanne Fischer worked as a law

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. T.S. was a high school student who was entitled to certain services pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. His education program was part of an Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) under which Independent School District Number 54 provided T.S. with a free and appropriate public e

ORDER JANIS GRAHAM JACK, Senior District Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendant City of Corpus Christi Independent School District’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (D.E. 16.) For the reasons stated herein, Defendant’s motion is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART, as detailed below. I. Jurisdiction The court has federal question jurisdiction over the p