Cases

Filed 12/5/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, D079001 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. CR127760) HEATHER LEATRICE HENLEY, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Di

OPINION CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which D. MICHAEL SWINEY, C.J., and JOHN W. McCLARTY, J„ joined. This is a Tenn. RApp. P. 9 appeal by First Tennessee Bank, N.A. (the Trustee) from the trial court’s order denying the Trustee’s motion for summary judgment. The beneficiaries of the Ray Haney TUW

OPINION OF THE COURT (October 27, 2017) Hodge, Chief Justice. Stanley D. Smith appeals from a December 15, 2016 Superior Court order awarding his ex-wife, Denise A. Henley, a 2.5% interest in the portion of his government pension earned during their marriage, and a 50% interest in land purchased during the marriage. Smith also contests the Superior Court’s receipt of portions of his

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING: (1) PLAINTIFFS’ OBJECTION TO DISCHARGE UNDER 11 U.S.C. § 727(a); and (2) DEFENDANTS’ COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST PLAINTIFFS, JERRY CAROOM AND MARY CAROOM PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 362(k) [Adv. Docket Nos. 1 & 10] JEFF BOHM, Chief Judge. I. Introduction It would be a gross understatement to characterize the dispute in this adversary proc

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J., ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J, and N. PATRICK CROOKS, J. ¶ 41. *629{dissenting). The per curiam correctly observes that Henley's motion for reconsideration is in essence a motion pursuing the disqualification of Justice Patience D. Roggensack. The motion asserts that the court's decision in State v. Henley1

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.us. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA SHAY HURD, ) ) Supreme Cou

MEMORANDUM OPINION Edward Ellington, Judge THIS MATTER came before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss (Adv. Dkt. #18) filed by Patrick C. Malouf and Porter & Malouf, P.A. and the Response in Opposi*270tion to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Adv. Dkt. #22) filed by James L. Henley, Jr., Chapter 13 Trustee. Havi

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 07a0174p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Petitioner-Appellant, - STEVE HENLEY,

OPINION ADELE HEDGES, Chief Justice. The principal issue in this case is whether the trial court’s determination of child support constitutes an abuse of discretion. The trial court computed the support obligation using the obligor’s earning capability, rather than his actual earnings. Because there is no evidence to support the implied finding of intent

French, J. {¶ 1} In this appeal, we consider the extent of a county’s responsibility for repairing and maintaining bridges under R.C. 5591.02 and 5591.21. Appellant, the Office of the Cuyahoga County Executive (“county”), and appellee, the city of Independence, each claim that the other is responsible for maintaining and repairing a bridge located in Cuyahoga County, on the borde

REVISED JUNE 18, 2002 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ________________________ Nos. 01-60678, 01-60679, 01-60680, 01-60681, 01-60682 ________________________ AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; FIRST COLONIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA; FIDELITY NATIONAL IN

113 Cal.Rptr.2d 494 (2002) 93 Cal.App.4th 824 Patricia HENLEY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PHILIP MORRIS INC., Defendant and Appellant. No. A086991. Court of Appeal, First District, Division Four. November 7, 2001. Review Granted January 29, 2002. *495 Gerald V. Barron, Lucy E. Mason, Sho

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 14, 1999 Session RANDALL DEWAYNE HENLEY, ET AL. v. RUSSELL DALE AMACHER, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Franklin County No. 9780-CIV Buddy D. Perry, Judge No. M1999-02799-COA-R3-CV - Filed January 28, 2002 This appeal involves an early morning,

487 F.3d 379 Steve HENLEY, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Ricky BELL, Warden, Riverbend Maximum Security Institution, Respondent-Appellee. No. 03-5891. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: November 28, 2006. Decided and Filed: May 15, 2007. ARGUED: Paul S. Davidson, Waller, Lansde

371 So.2d 883 (1979) BIRMINGHAM TRUST NATIONAL BANK et al. v. John C. HENLEY, III, et al. Charles A. GRADDICK, Attorney General v. BIRMINGHAM TRUST NATIONAL BANK et al. John C. HENLEY, III v. BIRMINGHAM TRUST NATIONAL BANK et al. 77-382, 77-382A and 77-382B. Supreme Court of Alabama. April 6, 1979. Rehearing Denied June 8, 1979.

GODBOLD, Chief Judge: This case concerns the effort of a state university, as an abutting landowner, to vacate and close a city public street and include the vacated area in its campus, without resorting to condemnation procedures. The district court enjoined the effort, and we affirm. Suit was brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for a temporary and permanent injunction against the University of Alabama at

984 F.2d 1040 61 USLW 2514 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Brian Edward HENLEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10439. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 17, 1992.Decided Jan. 29, 1993. Jared O. Smith, Tempe, AZ, for defendant-app

JOHNSON, Circuit Judge: This consolidated appeal challenges the propriety of the district court’s continuance of an injunction issued in favor of Appel-lees, First Alabama Bank (“First Alabama”) and bank officer Edward Herbert against further prosecution of a state court action filed against Appellees by Appellants Parsons Steel, Inc. (“Parsons-Mobile”), Jim D. and Melba Parsons (“Parsons”), and Tom McGregor, trustee in ba

779 F.2d 1553 29 Ed. Law Rep. 511 John C. HENLEY, III, an individual and T. Lawrence Johnson,an individual, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.David HERRING, Jeff Germany, Dr. John Katapodis, NinaMiglionico, Bill R. Meyers, Russell Yarbrough, William A.Bell, and Eddie Blankenship, individually and in theirofficial capacities as members of the Birmingham, AlabamaCity Council; the City of Birmingham, Alab

MADDOX, Justice, (dissenting). Everyone seems to agree that this is a unique case, but as I view it, there is just one legal question — what is the duty of a national bank in consolidation or merger proceedings, when the bank is co-trustee of a charitable trust, and a major asset of the trust is the stock of the bank ? The majority opinion sets out the facts and I shall not restate them, but I do