Cases

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS F.S.T., Inc. d/b/a Tiffany’s Dolls Cabaret, FILED Petitioner Below, Petitioner October 20, 2017 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK vs) No. 17-0016 (Hancock County 16-P-38) SUPREME

Rel: March 17, 2023 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Feb 14 2020, 9:31 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court

ARCHER, Circuit Judge. Nina Ricci, S.A.R.L. (Nina Ricci) appeals from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Board) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office in Opposition No. 69,977. Nina Ricci, S.A.R.L. v. E.T.F. Enterprises, Inc., 9 USPQ2d 1061 (TTAB 1988). The Board dismissed the opposition of Nina Ricci to the registration by E.T.

OPINION WALTERS, Justice. Plaintiff New Mexico Hospital Association (NMHA), as the representative of an unemployment compensation group fund, sued defendant A.T. & S.F. Memorial Hospitals (Memorial), a member of the fund, to recover compensatory and punitive damages for breach of a May 1982 contract entitled “Agreement to Participate in New Mexico Hospital Associati

65 F.3d 164 T.F.H. Publications, Inc., Dr. Herbert R. Axelrodv.A.A.A. Paper Corporation, Ahlstrom U.S.A. Incorporated,Ahlstrom Paper Corporation, A. Ahlstrom Corp.,Paper Corporation of U.S. NOS. 94-5554, 94-5616 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. July 31, 1995 Appeal From: D.N.J., No. 93-cv

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FIVE IN THE INTEREST OF: L.Q.F., ) No. ED109823 A.E.D., D.G.F., J.S.F., L.T.K., ) AND J.L.K. ) ) ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of Frank

OAKES, Circuit Judge: This appeal is from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern *882 District of New York, Peter K. Leisure, Judge, granting a preliminary injunction requiring T.F.H. Publications, Inc., to comply with the terms of a stipulation of settlement entered into betw

1 2026 CO 20 CenturyLink, Inc.; Glen F. Post, III; R. Stewart Ewing, Jr.; David D. Cole; William A. Owens; Martha H. Bejar; Virginia Boulet; Peter C. Brown; W. Bruce Hanks; Jeffrey K. Storey; Steven T. Clontz; Mary L. Landrieu; Gregory J. McCray; Harvey P. Perry; Michael J. Roberts; Laurie A. Siegel; and Sunit S. Patel, Petitioners v. Dean Houser, Respondent No.

NUMBER 13-19-00382-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG FRANK THOMAS SHUMATE JR. D/B/A F.T.S. TRUCKING, Appellant, v. BERRY CONTRACTING, L.P. D/B/A BAY, LTD., Appellee. O

August 21, 2012 JUDGMENT The Fourteenth Court of Appeals K.J. AND V.J. INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIENDS OF E.J., Appellants NO. 14-10-01188-CV V. USA WATER POLO, INC., CHRIS CULLEN, JASON PUYEAR, W.G., JR., AS NEXT FRIEND OF W.G., III, K.G. AND L.G. AS NEXT FRIENDS OF T.G., M.K. AND L.K. AS NEXT FRIENDS OF K.K., B.R.AND B.R. AS NEXT

Affirmed and Opinion filed August 21, 2012. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ___________________ NO. 14-10-01188-CV ___________________ K.J. AND V.J. INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF E.J., Appellants, V. USA WATER POLO, INC., CHRIS CULLEN, JASON PUYEAR, W.G., JR. AS

Motion Granted and Order filed March 1, 2012. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-10-01188-CV ____________ K.J. AND V.J., INDIVIDUALLY AND A/N/F OF E.J., A MINOR, Appellants V. USA WATER POLO, INC., ET AL, Appellees

Justice KAVANAUGH delivered the opinion of the Court. Under the Federal Arbitration Act, parties to a contract may agree that an arbitrator rather than a court will resolve disputes arising out of the contract. When a dispute arises, the parties sometimes may disagree not only about the merits of the dispute but also about the threshold arbitrability question-that is, whether their arb

RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1343-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Respondent, January

Order filed October 18, 2011. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-10-01188-CV ____________ K.J. and V.J., Individually and as Next Friend of E.J., a minor, Appellants V. USA Water Polo, Inc., et al, Appellees

HIGGINBOTHAM, J. In this negligence action, plaintiff appeals the district court's grant of the defendants' motion for involuntary dismissal at the close of plaintiff's case. *942FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On September 6, 2010, and December 8, 2010, Lakeshore Chrysler Dodge Jeep, Inc., a n

Holly Kirby, J. We granted permission to appeal in this breach-of-contract case to address the use of extrinsic evidence in the interpretation of contracts. Tennessee judges have long used extrinsic evidence of the context and circumstances at the time the parties entered into the contract to facilitate interpretation of contractual terms in accord with the parties' intent. However, t

986 F.2d 1409 Hoover (Paul K., Jr.), Coston (William F., III), t/d/b/aKelaco, Kennie's Markets, Inc.v.Maerk Ltd., Zahler (Nelson S.), Food Lion, Inc., Maerk Ltd. NO. 92-7299 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Jan 14, 1993 1 Appeal From: M.D.Pa.

Justice GINSBURG, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur in the Court's holding regarding domestic exhaustion-a patentee who sells a product with an express restriction on reuse or resale may not enforce that restriction through an infringement lawsuit, because the U.S. sale exhausts the U.S. patent rights in the product sold. See ante, at 1531 - 1536. I dissent, however, from