Cases

OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge 1. INTRODUCTION In this employment action, Plaintiff Matthew Webster (hereinafter, “Plaintiff’), a practicing Seventh Day Adventist, alleges that Defendants Dollar General, Inc., Bob Miller, and Vince Triboletti (hereinafter, “Defendants” or “Dollar General”) violated section 703(a) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (hereinafter, “Title VII”) and breached th

In this breach of contract action, defendant Patricia Griffith was employed by Inacom as senior vice-president of marketing and engagement services. Between 1999 and 2000, she entered into retention and other compensation and benefit agreements with Inacom. On June 16, 2000, Inacom, its affiliates, and other associated debtors filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, *439and on or about August 3

399 F.Supp.2d 528 (2005) Benjamin KLEIN and Atlas Telecommunications of Rockland County, Inc., a New York Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. VISION LAB TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Florida Corporation, Defendant. No. 05 Civ. 3615(WCC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 18, 2005. *529 Bellin & Associates (Aytan Y.

956 A.2d 671 (2008) PORTUGUESE AMERICAN LEADERSHIP COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES, INC., Appellant, v. INVESTORS' ALERT, INC., et al., Appellees. No. 04-CV-1187. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued June 7, 2007. Decided September 11, 2008. *672 Stephen H. Ring, with whom Eric J. Menhart was on the brief,

395 F.Supp.2d 835 (2005) SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. David C. GUENTHNER, and Jay M. Samuelson, Defendants. No. 8:02CV10. United States District Court, D. Nebraska. September 26, 2005. *836 *837 Robert Fusfeld and Polly Atkinson of the SEC's Denver office, for S.E.C. <

927 N.E.2d 682 (2010) ITALIA FOODS, INC., Indiv. and as the Representative of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SUN TOURS, INC., d/b/a Hobbit Travel, and Paul Grosso, Defendants-Appellants. No. 2-08-1148. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. February 24, 2010. As Modified Upon Denial of Rehearing April 5, 2010. <

JUSTICE JORGENSEN delivered the opinion of the court: I. INTRODUCTION In this interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (155 Ill. 2d R. 308), we are asked to answer three certified questions: “(1) Does the language and pu

815 A.2d 816 (2003) 149 Md. App. 219 R.A. PONTE ARCHITECTS, Ltd., v. INVESTORS' ALERT, INC., et al. No. 537, Sept. Term, 2001. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. January 29, 2003. Stephen H. Ring of Rockville, (Philip L. Feliciano of Kensington, on the brief), for appellant. Robert G. Lawman, Jr. of Houston, Texas (Patrick Donahue o

857 A.2d 1 (2004) 382 Md. 689 R.A. PONTE ARCHITECTS, LTD. v. INVESTORS' ALERT, INC., et al. No. 17, Sept. Term, 2003. Court of Appeals of Maryland. August 26, 2004. *2 BELL, C.J., ELDRIDGE,[*] RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL and BATTAGLIA, JJ. ELDRIDGE, J. The issue in this case is

329 F.Supp.2d 789 (2004) ACCOUNTING OUTSOURCING, LLC, et al., Plaintiff, United States of America, Intervenor State of Louisiana, Intervenor v. VERIZON WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, L.P. No. CIV.A. 03-161-D-M3, CIV.A. 03-169-D-M3, CIV.A. 03-173-D-M3, CIV.A. 03-198-D-M3, CIV.A. 03 — 208-D-M3, CIV.A. 03-358-D-M3, CIV.A. 03-406-D-M3, CIV.A. 03-421-D-M3, CIV.A. 03-468-D-M3. United States Distri

327 F.Supp.2d 426 (2004) In re LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION, Warren F. Reinhart and Gerald M. Smith, On Behalf of Themselves and A Class of Persons Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Lucent Technologies, Inc., et. al., Defendants. Sandra Balaban, On Behalf of Herself and and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Henry B. Schacht, Richard A. McGinn, Deborah C. Hopkins, Paul A. Allaire, Betsy S. Atkins, Ca