Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “In-Shape Holdings, LLC”
Get in Shape Franchise, Inc. v. TFL Fishers, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Saris, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION This case involves a dispute between a franchisor of small group fitness studios for women and a former franchisee. Plaintiff Get In Shape Franchise, Inc. (GISFW) is a Massachusetts corporation with more than eighty franchise locations in sixteen states across the country that do business under the name “Get In Shape For Women.” GIS
Sweely Holdings, LLC v. Suntrust Bankpublic domain
OPINION BY JUSTICE D. ARTHUR KELSEY SunTrust Bank ("SunTrust") made secured loans totaling $18.3 million to Sweely Holdings, LLC ("Sweely") and later sought to recover collateral when Sweely defaulted and threatened bankruptcy. The parties negotiated a Master Loan Modification and Forbearance Agreement ("Workout Agreement") that provided Sweely with another opportunity to pay its debt.
Melo Enterprises, LLC v. D1 Sports Holdings, LLCpublic domain
01/25/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 8, 2018 Session MELO ENTERPRISES, LLC ET AL. v. D1 SPORTS HOLDINGS, LLC Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. 46199 Deanna B. Johnson, Judge ___________________________________
In re P3 Health Group Holdings, LLCpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE P3 HEALTH GROUP ) Consol. C.A. No. 2021-0518-JTL HOLDINGS, LLC ) OPINION Date Submitted: July 13, 2022 Date Decided: September 12, 2022 Bruce E. Jameson, Corinne Elise Amato, Eric J. Juray, Elizabeth Wang, PRICKETT, JONES & ELLIOTT, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Craig Carpenito, Richard H. Walker, Sa
Angell v. Santefort Family Holdings, LLCpublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
Standard of Review When considering a Rule 12(b)(2) motion without an evidentiary hearing, a district court uses the prima facie standard to evaluate whether it has personal jurisdiction over the defendant. Under this standard, "the inquiry is whether the plaintiff has proffered evidence which, if credited, is sufficient to support findings of all facts essential to personal jurisdiction." Phillips v. Prairie E
Angell v. Santefort Family Holdings, LLCpublic domain
2020 IL App (3d) 180724 Opinion filed March 17, 2020 Modified Upon Denial of Rehearing June 12, 2020 ____________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TRIFECTA MULTIMEDIA HOLDINGS ) INC., and DAVE YOUNG, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0699-JTL ) WCG CLINICAL SERVICES LLC, )
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 22-0056 ══════════ CPS Energy, Petitioner, v. Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas ═══════════════════════════════════════
W.J. Menkins Holdings, LLC v. Douglass Twp.public domain
OPINION BY JUDGE COVEY W.J. Menkins Holdings, LLC (Applicant) appeals from the Berks County Common Pleas Court's (trial court) June 28, 2018 order affirming the Douglass Township Zoning Hearing Board's (ZHB) decision granting a variance subject to conditions and denying the other requested relief. Applicant essentially presents one issue for this Court's review: whether the ZHB's condi
In Re: Global Ip Holdings LLCpublic domain
Stoll, Circuit Judge. Global IP Holdings, LLC appeals the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision affirming the examiner's rejection of its reissue claims for failure to comply with the written description requirement. Because the legal standard applied by the Board conflicts with our precedent, we vacate the Board's decision and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opin
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LVI GROUP INVESTMENTS, LLC ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 12067-VCG ) NCM GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC, ) SUBHAS KHARA, EVERGREEN ) PACIFIC PARTNERS, L.P., ) EVERGREEN PACIFIC PARTNERS ) GP, LLC, EVERGREEN PACIFIC ) PARTNERS I
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff here is a rail carrier, Ches-sie Logistics, which claims it was injured when its neighbor Krinos damaged its railroad tracks. Chessie Logistics sued for trespass, negligence, and violation of a federal railroad statute. The district court dismissed the statutory claim and then granted summary judgment to defendants on Chessie’s claims for trespass and negligence. On appeal, Chessie seeks
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT INGENCO HOLDINGS, LLC, a No. 16-35792 Delaware limited liability company; BIO ENERGY D.C. No. (WASHINGTON), LLC, a 2:13-cv-00543-RAJ Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, OPINION v. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Dist
Janet Travis, Inc. v. Preka Holdings, LLCpublic domain
Saad, J. Defendant appeals the trial court’s order that denied its motion for summary disposition and granted plaintiffs request for a permanent injunction. For the reasons stated below, we affirm. I. NATURE OF THE CASE This action is a trademark-infringement suit. Michigan courts have protected trademark rights since the nineteenth century, initially under the common law of unfair competi
LSVC Holdings LLC v. Vestcom Parent Holdings Inc.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LSVC HOLDINGS, LLC, a Delaware ) limited liability company, ) ) Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 8424-VCMR ) VESTCOM PARENT HOLDINGS, INC., ) a Delaware corporation, )
J.S. v. Village Voice Media Holdings, LLCpublic domain
Gordon McCloud, J. ¶36 (dissenting) — The question before us is whether J.S.’s14 civil lawsuit against these particular defendants can proceed or whether federal law shields Backpage15 from suit. In 1996, Congress passed the Communications Decency Act (CDA), 47 U.S.C. § 230, a statute that gives “interactive service providers” such as Backpage immunity from lawsuits based o
Denmax Energy Services, Inc. and Battle River Holdings, Inc. v. Lightpoint Engineering, LLCpublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-22-00120-CV __________________ DENMAX ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND BATTLE RIVER HOLDINGS, INC., Appellants/Cross-Appellees V. LIGHTPOINT ENGINEERING, LLC, Appellee/Cro
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-14-00364-CV _________________ EVERGREEN MEDIA HOLDINGS, LLC AND TONY DEROSA-GRUND, Appellants V. FILMENGINE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, Appellee ________________________
White Lion Holdings, LLC v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-14-00104-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/26/2015 8:21:49 PM