Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION LEONARD P. STARK, District Judge. On September 24, 2008, Le T. Le (“Le” or “Plaintiff’) filed the present lawsuit (Docket Item (“D.I.”) 1) against the City of Wilmington (“City”), the City’s Manager of Integrated Technologies, Joseph F. Capodanno, Jr. (“Capodanno”), and the City’s Director of Integrated Technologies, James J. O’Donnell (“O’Donnell”) (collectively, “Defendants”). L

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-77,038 US CARNELL PETETAN, JR., Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON DIRECT APPEAL FROM CAUSE NO. 2012-2331-C1 IN THE 19TH DISTRICT COURT McLENNAN

AP-77,038 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 8/27/2015 9:30:07 AM August 27, 2015 Accepted 8/27/2015 11:10:26 AM

ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM

164 Cal.App.2d 269 (1958) SQUARE CAUSEY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ROBERT LEON CORNELIUS et al., Defendants and Appellants. Civ. No. 23123. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two. Oct. 16, 1958. Hecker & Dunford and Bruce L. Wolfson for Plaintiff and Appellant. Early, Maslach, Foran & Williams, Victor E. Williams and Donald J. Pier

93 F.3d 497 24 Media L. Rep. 2295 Ralph P. FORBES, and The People, Appellants,v.THE ARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION COMMISSION, and itsBoard of Directors in their Official Capacities; TheArkansas Educational Telecommunications Network Foundation,and its Members and Officers Susan J. Howarth, in herOfficial Capacity as Executive Director; Victor Fleming, inhis Official Capacity as Chairman;

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 19, 2015 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOSEPH JOHN VOLPE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 278278 Barry A. Steelman, Judge No. E2014-00655-CCA-R3-CD - Filed September 3, 2015 The Defendant, Joseph John Volpe, was found guilty by a Hamilton County Criminal Court ju

MEMORANDUM BUCKWALTER, Senior District Judge. Defendant City of Philadelphia has filed the present Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and, Alternatively, for a New Trial. For the following reasons, the Motion is denied. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1 Plaintiff is a local council of the Boy Scouts of America, and administers

736 F.Supp.2d 842 (2010) Le T. LE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF WILMINGTON, Joseph F. Capodanno, Jr., and James J. O'Donnell, Defendants. Civ. No. 08-615-LPS. United States District Court, D. Delaware. September 7, 2010. *843 Victor F. Battaglia, Sr., Biggs & Battaglia, Wilmington, DE, for Plaintiff.

ACCEPTED 05-15-01292-CV 05-15-01292-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS

JANE P. WISEMAN, Judge. T 1 Plaintiff Terry Moore, individually and as next friend of Jerrit Moore, a minor, appeals a judgment entered in Defendants' favor resulting from a jury verdict rendered on April 11, 2011, in favor of Defendant Robert Blackwell. Having reviewed the ree-ord and pertinent law, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. FACTS 12 According to Plaintiff's appellate

ACCEPTED 01-15-00260 FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/17/2015 8:29:47 PM

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 17, 2001 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RUSSELL MAZE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 99-B-1308 Steve Dozier, Judge No. M2000-02249-CCA-R3-CD - Filed August 16, 2002 A Davidson County grand jury indicted the defendant on one count of cl

(2008) Miguel VERGARA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF WAUKEGAN, et al., Defendants. No. 04 C 6586. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 22, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MILTON I. SHADUR, Senior District Judge. Plaintiffs, opponents of the towing ordinance adopted by the City of Waukegan ("Waukeg

737 N.E.2d 719 (2000) Michael G. ALBRECHT, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 49S00-9901-CR-55. Supreme Court of Indiana. October 19, 2000. *723 Katherine A. Cornelius, Marion County Public Defenders Office, Appellate Division, Indianapolis, Indiana, Attorney for Appellant. Jeffrey A. Modiset

Filed 10/16/19 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- THE PEOPLE, C079382 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 13F07431) v. JOVAN JERMAINE

Opinion SCHALLER, J. The defendant, Roberto Arceniega, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of conspiracy to possess narcotics in violation of General Statutes §§ 53U-481 and 2 la-279 (a),2 *290conspiracy to sell narcotics in violation of General Statu

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-01-00085-CR

51 F.3d 820 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Carlos Tapia PONCE, aka Carlos Perez, Ricardo Lopez Mateos,Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.James Romero McTAGUE, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Hector Tapia ANCHONDO, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Hugo Fernando CASTILLON-ALVAREZ, aka Hug