⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “In the Matter of the Search of a single family-style dwelling”

Montana Supreme Court · 2016-12-14 · Published · cited 0× · 2007 MT 334
12/14/2016 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: AF 07-0157 AF 07-0157 _________________ IN THE MATTER OF THE MONTANA RULES ORDER OF CIVIL P
Montana Supreme Court · 2011-04-26 · Published · cited 0× · 2007 MT 334
April 26 2011 TITLE I. Scope of Rules; Form of Action Rule 1. Scope of Rules. These rules govern the procedure in all civil actions and proceedings in the district courts of the state of Montana, including probate proceedings, unless specifically provided to the contrary in the Uniform Probate Code; and except as stated in Rule 81. They should be construed and administered to s
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024-06-03 · Published · cited 1× · 9 N.W.3d 174
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A23-1762 In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. K. and A. S., Parents. Filed June 3, 2024 Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded; motion denied Johnson, Judge Concurring in part, dissenting in part, Reyes, Judge
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003-05-22 · Published · cited 0× · 187 Or. App. 733; 69 P.3d 815; 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 659
BREWER, J. Husband appeals from a judgment that modified his monthly spousal support obligation to wife by reducing it from $6,000 to $3,000. Husband contends that the trial court should have reduced the support award to $250 per month and that, because he is unemployed and has no immediate prospects of finding employment, the court erred in attributing to him potential income of $120,000 per year. Husband also assigns error t
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003-04-03 · Published · cited 59× · 658 N.W.2d 565; 2003 Minn. LEXIS 183; 2003 WL 1741915
658 N.W.2d 565 (2003) In the Matter of the WELFARE OF B.R.K. No. C7-01-1466. Supreme Court of Minnesota. April 3, 2003. *568 Lori J. Marco, Briggs and Morgan, Special Ass't State Public Defender, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellant. Mike Hatch, State Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, Dwayne Knutsen, Chippewa County Attorney, J. Richard S
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-10-22 · Published · cited 0×
N0. 01-14-01004-CV IN THE FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS FIRST COURT OF APPEAL HOUSTON, TEXAS AT HOUSTON 10/22/2015 4:44:20 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE ___________________________ Clerk Kevin CAMPBELL,
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012-09-13 · Published · cited 63× · 694 F.3d 259; 2012 WL 4017478; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 19219
OPINION OF THE COURT McKEE, Chief Judge. Erick Oliva-Ramos petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming an Immigration Judge’s order removing him to Guatemala. He also seeks review of the BIA’s denial of his motion to supplement the record and to reopen his removal proceeding before an Immigration Judge.
District Court, D. Maryland · 2011-02-02 · Published · cited 35× · 766 F. Supp. 2d 604; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9869; 2011 WL 345904
766 F.Supp.2d 604 (2011) Angele L. CHANG-WILLIAMS v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, et al. Civil Action No. DKC 10-0783. United States District Court, D. Maryland. February 2, 2011. *607 Angele L. Chang-Williams, Capitol Heights, MD, pro se. Jason Daniel Medinger, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for Departmen
Hawaii Supreme Court · 2009-03-16 · Published · cited 95× · 202 P.3d 1226; 120 Haw. 181; 2009 Haw. LEXIS 42
202 P.3d 1226 (2009) The SIERRA CLUB, a California non-profit corporation registered to do business in the State of Hawaii; Maui Tomorrow, Inc., a Hawaii non-profit corporation; and the Kahului Harbor Coalition, an unincorporated association, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees/Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. The DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OF the STATE OF HAWAII; Brennon Morioka, in his capacity as Director of the Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2022-10-31 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-06-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
New York Court of Appeals · 2020-11-23 · Published · cited 0×
State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 74 The People &c. ex rel. Fred Johnson, Appellant, v. Superintendent, Adirondack Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents. ---------------------------------
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-04-17 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2017-01-12 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-15-00101-CV RICKY J. SHUGART, Appellant V. DAVID THOMPSON, A.K.A. “LEAD AGENT,” A.K.A. “AGENTS” AND UNKNOWN DEPUTIES, A.K.A. “AGENTS” EACH IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT OF FANNIN COUNTY, Appellees On Appeal from
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2026-08-07 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued June 5, 2026 Decided August 7, 2026 No. 26-5123 NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES, APPELLEE v. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, ET AL., APPELLANTS Consolidated with 26-5134 Appeals from the United States Dist
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2026-08-07 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued June 5, 2026 Decided August 7, 2026 No. 26-5123 NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES, APPELLEE v. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, ET AL., APPELLANTS Consolidated with 26-5134 Appeals from the United States Dist
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-11-30 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM