Cases

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE THE BOEING COMPANY ) C.A. No. 2019-0907-MTZ DERIVATIVE LITIGATION ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: June 25, 2021 Date Decided: September 7, 2021 Joel Friedlander, Jeffrey M. Gorris, and Christopher M. Foulds, FRIEDLANDER & GORRIS, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Richard M. Heimann and Katherine Lubin Benson, LIEFF CABRASER HEIMAN

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1492 Doc: 87 Filed: 07/20/2026 Pg: 1 of 42 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1492 STATE OF RHODE ISLAND OFFICE OF THE GENERAL TREASURER, on behalf of The Employees Retirement System of The State of Rhode Island; LOCAL #817

621 F.Supp.2d 131 (2009) In re SEPTEMBER 11 LITIGATION. Nos. 21 MC 101(AKH), 07 Civ. 7051(AKH), 08 Civ. 10646(AKH). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 16, 2009. *135 Derek Todd Smith, Zafer Adem Akin, Akin & Smith, LLC, for World Trade Farmers Market, Inc., Adem Arici, Omer Ipek. Douglas J. Pepe, Gregory P. Jose

*476MEMORANDUM & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, United States District Judge On June 16, 2016, the Court issued orders approving the plan of allocation of the net settlement fund and the class action settlement. Dkt. Nos. 123-24. The Court now addresses Lead Counsel’s application for attorney’s fees. For the reasons that follow, Counsel’s applic

280 F.Supp.2d 279 (2003) In re SEPTEMBER 11 LITIGATION No. 21 MC 97(AKH). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 9, 2003. *280 *281 *282 *283 *284

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-3389 DIANE BURKE, et al., as participants in and on behalf of the Boeing Voluntary Investment Plan, and on behalf of a class of all others who are similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, et al.,

40 F.Supp.2d 1160 (1998) In re BOEING SECURITIES LITIGATION. This Document Relates to all Cases. No. C97-1715Z. United States District Court, W.D. Washington. September 8, 1998. *1161 *1162 *1163 ORDER ZILLY, District Judge. THIS MATTER

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE THE BOEING CO. ) Consol. C.A. No. 2024-1210-MTZ DERIVATIVE LITIGATION ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: May 22, 2026 Date Decided: August 13, 2026 Derrick B. Farrell, Matthew L. Miller, Robert B. Lackey, BLEICHMAR FONTI AND AULD LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Javier Bleichmar, Jos

Case: 19-2148 Document: 51 Page: 1 Filed: 08/10/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ THE BOEING COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2019-2148 ______________________ Appeal from the United

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2454 SERVOTRONICS, INC., Movant - Appellant, v. THE BOEING COMPANY; ROLLS-ROYCE PLC, Intervenors - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:18-mc-003

*1037MEMORANDUM OF OPINION CHARLES R. BREYER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs proposed a class action against Tesla Motors, Inc. and Tesla executive Elon Musk (collectively, “Tesla”), on behalf of all persons who purchased Tesla stock between August 19, 2013, and November 17, 2013 (the “Class Period”). The suit alleged that Tesla violat

705 F.Supp.2d 367 (2010) In re SYNCHRONOSS SECURITIES LITIGATION. Civil Action No. 08-4437 (GEB). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. April 7, 2010. *371 Gardy & Notis, LLP, James S. Notis, Esq., Charles A. Germershausen, Esq., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Milberg LLP, Ariana J. Tadler, Esq., Todd L. Kammerman, Esq., New York, NY,

*242ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CERTIFY CLASS PURSUANT TO RULE 23(b)(3) WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff has filed a putative class action against defendants claiming violations of the Securities Exchange Act and alleging false and misleading statements relating to payments made to walnut growers. To the extent sta

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) ■ the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Approval of Proposed Settlement, Plan of Allocation and Certification of Class for Settlement Purposes, filed July 23, 2012 (Doc. 391)(“Motion for Final Approval”); and (ii) Co-Lead Counsel’s Motion for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses and Memo

*406ORDER APPOINTING LEAD PLAINTIFF WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, this order appoints Mississippi PERS as lead plaintiff. Accordingly, this order DENIES the motions of other parties for appointment as lead plaintiff. This order also sets forth the procedure

*249 MEMORANDUM OPINION LIAM O’GRADY, District Judge. This is a class action arising out of allegations of widespread accounting fraud perpetrated by the Mills Corporation and related entities, resulting in massive losses incurred by individual and institutional investors alike. For the reasons that follow, the Court here

527 F.Supp.2d 262 (2007) In re INTELLIGROUP SECURITIES LITIGATION. Civil Action No. 04-1980 (GEB). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. November 13, 2007. *263 *264 *265 *266 *267

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CONSOLIDATED IN RE TRANSUNION DERIVATIVE C.A. No. 2022-1103-LWW STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: June 7, 2024 Date Decided: October 1, 2024 Kevin M. Gallagher & Spencer V. Crawford, RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Sandr

532 F.Supp.2d 1260 (2006) In re METROPOLITAN SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. CV-04-0025-FVS. United States District Court, E.D. Washington. November 5, 2007. *1270 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS FRED VAN SICKLE, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on four motions to dismiss

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE: AIR CRASH OVER THE SOUTHERN INDIAN OCEAN, ON MARCH 8, 2014 ___________________________________ MDL Docket No. 2712 This Document Relates To: Misc. No. 16-1184 (KBJ) ALL CASES MEMORANDUM OPINION The legal claims in this multi-district litigation (“MD