⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “In re Sulzer Orthopedics Inc. Hip Prosthesis and Knee Prosthesis Liability Litigation”

District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004-08-25 · Published · cited 0× · 335 F. Supp. 2d 830; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21982; 2004 WL 2091224
335 F.Supp.2d 830 (2004) In Re: SULZER ORTHOPEDICS INC. HIP PROSTHESIS AND KNEE PROSTHESIS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION No. 1:01-CV-9000. MDL NO. 1401, 1:03-CV-9007. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. August 25, 2004. *831 Charles R. Parker, Hill & Parker, Houston, TX, Daniel E. Becnel, Jr., Reserve, LA, Davi
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003-06-12 · Published · cited 10× · 268 F. Supp. 2d 907; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15662; 2003 WL 21456300
268 F.Supp.2d 907 (2003) In re: SULZER HIP PROSTHESIS AND KNEE PROSTHESIS LIABILITY LITIGATION. No. 1:01-CV-9000, MDL Docket No. 1401. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. June 12, 2003. *908 Charles R. Parker, Hill & Parker, Houston, TX, Daniel E. Becnel, Jr., Reserve, LA, David W. Zoll, Zoll & Kranz, Toled
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003-10-31 · Published · cited 2× · 290 F. Supp. 2d 840; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20004; 2003 WL 22570152
290 F.Supp.2d 840 (2003) In re: SULZER HIP PROSTHESIS AND KNEE PROSTHESIS LIABILITY LITIGATION No. 1:01-CV-9000. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. October 31, 2003. Daniel E. Becnel, Jr., Reserve, LA, Don Barrett, Barrett Law Office, Lexington, MS, James R. Dugan, II, Gauthier, Dowing, *841 Labarre, Beiser &
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001-08-31 · Published · cited 0× · 204 F.R.D. 359; 2001 WL 1540546
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER O’MALLEY, District Judge. On August 29, 2001, this Court provisionally certified a class and granted preliminary approval to the parties’ settlement agreement. This memorandum sets forth the Court’s reasoning. I. Background. Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc. (“Sulzer Orthopedics”) is a designer, manufácturer and distributor of orthopedi
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001-08-31 · Published · cited 54× · 204 F.R.D. 330; 2001 WL 1579960
*335 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER O’MALLEY, District Judge. On August 29, 2001, this Court provisionally certified a class and granted preliminary approval to the parties’ settlement agreement. This memorandum sets forth the Court’s reasoning. I. Background. Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc. (“Sulzer Orthoped
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001-09-17 · Published · cited 0× · 176 F. Supp. 2d 758; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24342; 2001 WL 1579963
176 F.Supp.2d 758 (2001) In re INTER-OP HIP PROSTHESIS PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION No. 1:01-CV-9000. MDL Docket No. 1401. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. September 17, 2001. *759 Charles R. Parker, Hill & Parker, Houston, TX, Daniel E. Becnel, Jr., Reserve, LA, Don Barrett, Barrett Law Office, P.A., Lexing
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001-09-17 · Published · cited 2× · 174 F. Supp. 2d 648; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19967; 2001 WL 1540552
174 F.Supp.2d 648 (2001) In re INTER-OP HIP PROSTHESIS PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION. No. 1:01-CV-9000. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. September 17, 2001. *649 Charles R. Parker, Hill & Parker, Houston, TX, Daniel E. Becnel, Jr., Reserve, LA, Don Barrett, Barrett law office, P.A., Lexington, MS, Janet G. Ab
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006-10-03 · Published · cited 5× · 455 F. Supp. 2d 709; 2006 WL 2846863
455 F.Supp.2d 709 (2006) In re: SULZER HIP PROSTHESIS AND KNEE PROSTHESIS LIABILITY LITIGATION This Document Relates to: Howard v. Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc., 1:03CV9006 Burgess v. Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc., 1:04CV9005 No. 1:01-CV-9000. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. October 3, 2006. *710
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006-10-03 · Published · cited 0× · 455 F. Supp. 2d 709; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72187; 2006 WL 2846863
MEMORANDUM & ORDER O’MALLEY, District Judge. This opinion discusses three cases that have been transferred to this Court as related to Multi-District Litigation (“MDL”) No. 1401, known as In re: Sulzer Orthopedics Inc. Hip Prosthesis and Knee Prosthesis Products Liability Litigation1 The three cases are: (1) Moore v. Sulzer Orthoped
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005-02-22 · Published · cited 4× · 399 F.3d 816; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 2994; 2005 WL 407715
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge. In December of 2000, Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc., issued a recall of certain of its hip implants, which were determined to be defective. Shortly thereafter, more than thirteen hundred civil actions were filed across the United States. Thirty of those actions were consolidated and transferred
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2011-06-21 · Published · cited 0× · 796 F. Supp. 2d 1305; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66082; 2011 WL 2472594
796 F.Supp.2d 1305 (2011) Brian C. HOWARD, M.D. and Suzanne Howard, Plaintiffs, v. SULZER ORTHOPEDICS, INC., Sulzer Medica USA Holding Co., Sulzer Medica USA, Inc.,[1] and Zimmer, Inc., Defendants. Case No. 02-CV-0564-CVE-FHM. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. June 21, 2011. Matthew Benjamin Free, Timothy Grover Best, Best & Sharp, Tulsa, O
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005-02-22 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 05a0083p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - In re: SULZER ORTHOPEDIC
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007-08-10 · Published · cited 42× · 498 F.3d 365; 68 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1401; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 18975; 2007 WL 2287742
498 F.3d 365 (2007) Susan F. KUHN; Michael Kuhn, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SULZER ORTHOPEDICS, INC., Defendant-Appellee, Tommy Jacks, Individually; Tommy Jacks, P.C.; Mithoff & Jacks, L.L.P., Appellees. No. 06-3576. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: June 8, 2007. Decided and Filed: August 10, 2007.
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004-05-18 · Published · cited 3× · 337 F. Supp. 2d 1002; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20370; 2004 WL 2203412
337 F.Supp.2d 1002 (2004) Henry MOORE, Jr., Plaintiff, v. SULZER ORTHOPEDICS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 1:02 CV 9116. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. May 18, 2004. *1003 Joseph Rathbone Park, Park & Ossian, Clearwater, FL, for Plaintiff. Edward Walter Gerecke, Carlton Fields Ward Emmanuel
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007-08-10 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 07a0306p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiffs-Appellants
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2010-10-19 · Published · cited 9× · 760 F. Supp. 2d 640; 2010 WL 5576193
760 F.Supp.2d 640 (2010) In re VIOXX PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. This Document Relates To All Cases. MDL No. 1657. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. October 19, 2010. *641 Orran L. Brown, Browngreer PLC, Richmond, VA, for Plaintiff. Eric Michael Liddick, Harry Simms Hardin, III, Madeleine Fischer, Jones Walker,
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009-01-05 · Published · cited 86× · 592 F. Supp. 2d 1147; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50248; 2009 WL 35467
592 F.Supp.2d 1147 (2009) In re MEDTRONIC, INC. SPRINT FIDELIS LEADS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, This document relates to: All Cases. Multidistrict Litigation No. 08-1905 (RHK/JSM). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. January 5, 2009. *1148 Daniel E. Gustafson, Gustafson Gluek, PLLC, Plaintiffs' lead counsel, Robert K.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008-04-09 · Published · cited 28× · 553 F. Supp. 2d 442; 2008 WL 942592
553 F.Supp.2d 442 (2008) In re DIET DRUGS (PHENTERMINE, FENFLURAMINE, DEXFENFLURAMINE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: Sheila Brown; et al. v. American Home Products Corporation. MDL Docket No. 1203. Civil Action No. 99-20593. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 8, 2008. As Corrected April 9, 2008.
District Court, E.D. New York · 1995-07-11 · Published · cited 17× · 891 F. Supp. 751; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10246; 1995 WL 415764
891 F.Supp. 751 (1995) STRYKER CORPORATION and Osteonics Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. INTERMEDICS ORTHOPEDICS, INC. and Marli Medical Supplies, Inc., Defendants. No. CV 90-3006 (ADS). United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 11, 1995. *752 *753 *754
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007-12-31 · Published · cited 74× · 528 F. Supp. 2d 752; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95127; 2007 WL 4613804
528 F.Supp.2d 752 (2007) In re CARDINAL HEALTH INC. SECURITIES LITIGATIONS, Plaintiff, This Document Relates To: All Securities Actions. No. C2-04-575. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. December 31, 2007. *753 *754 John R. Climaco, Scott D. Simpkins, Climaco Lefkowitz Peca