Cases

22-943 In re Treasury Securities Auction Antitrust Litigation IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________ August Term, 2023 Argued: October 3, 2023 Decided: February 1, 2024 No. 22-943 _____

*978ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 55 LUCY H, KOH, United States District Judge , ;, Plaintiffs Frank Fish (“lead plaintiff’), Joerg Mueller, George Nuckols, Richard Flynn, Neil Jubitz, and Retail Wholesale Department Store Union Local 338 Retirement Fund (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) allege that Defend

*1002ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT MARTIN SHKRELFS MOTION TO DISMISS EDWARD J. DAVILA, United States District Judge Lead Plaintiffs Kaniz Fatema, Zeke Ingram, Bhaskar R. Gudlavenkatasiva, and Abuhena M. Saifulislam, as well as Plaintiff Austin Isensee (collectively the “Plaintiffs”), individually and on behalf of all the other persons similarly situat

*440 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GEORGE B. DANIELS, District Judge: Before the Court is the Motion for Class Certification of Lead Plaintiffs BIM Intermobiliare SGR (“BIM”), Robert Ahearn, and DRYE Custom Pallets (“DRYE”). Plaintiffs allege that the accounting firm Grant Thornton (“GT”) committed securities fraud in violation of § 10(b

Appellate Case: 21-4126 Document: 167-1 Date Filed: 10/15/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 15, 2024

*404MEMORANDUM OPINION Leonie M. Brinkema, United States District Judge Lead Plaintiffs seek to certify a nationwide class pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3) composed of “[a]ll persons and entities that, during the period from February 25, 2010 through February 27, 2014, inclusive, purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly traded sec

RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge. The plaintiffs bring this class action on behalf of all persons who purchased common stock from Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”) during the period from October 22, 1998 through October 7; 1999, alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). The plaintiffs bring their claims under Sections 10(b) an

OPINION SIDNEY H. STEIN, District Judge. I. Introduction and Summary................................................372 II. Background.............................................................374 A. The Alleged Fraud Summarized.......................................374 B. Pre-Settlement Procedural History................................

705 F.Supp.2d 367 (2010) In re SYNCHRONOSS SECURITIES LITIGATION. Civil Action No. 08-4437 (GEB). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. April 7, 2010. *371 Gardy & Notis, LLP, James S. Notis, Esq., Charles A. Germershausen, Esq., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Milberg LLP, Ariana J. Tadler, Esq., Todd L. Kammerman, Esq., New York, NY,

MEMORANDUM ORDER LEONARD P. STARK, District Judge. WHEREAS, Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge issued a Report and Recommendation (D.I. 84; D.I. 105) (“Report”), dated June 16, 2011, recommending that the Court deny the motion to dismiss (D.I. 63) filed by Defendants Richard J. Heckmann, James Danforth Quayle, Alfred E. Osborne, Jr., Lou L. Holtz, and Donald G. Ezzell (collectively, “Individual D

*1002ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge. Currently before the Court are two motions: (1) Defendant Peter Leparulo’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, Doc. No. 289; and (2) a Motion for Summary Judgment, Doc. No. 290, by

*827OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The above referenced securities-fraud, putative class action alleges material misrepresentations and omissions by Defendants regarding Key Energy Services, Inc.’s (“Key’s”) financial condition and the future of its business, leading to inflated stock prices in violation of §§ 10(b), co

ORDER R. BROOKE JACKSON, District Judge. This case is before the Court on defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended and Consolidated Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws [docket ##-35, 36] and Lead Plaintiffs Motion to Strike or Disregard Portions of Defendants’ Reply in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [# 43]. On April 29, 2013, the Court held oral argu

*156ORDER ADDRESSING PENDING MOTIONS SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on the following motions: Plaintiffs’ Motion to Cer*157tify Class [Docket No. 397], filed on August 1, 2007; IMI Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony and Opinions of Dr. John Bey

706 F.Supp.2d 1336 (2010) In re HOMEBANC CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION. Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-1461-TCB. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. April 13, 2010. *1340 Christopher Steven Jones, Joseph E. White, III, Maya Saxena, Saxena White, P.A., Julie Prag Vianale, Kenneth J. Vianale, Vianale & Vianale,

672 F.Supp.2d 520 (2009) In re AGRIA CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. 08 Civ.3536 (WHP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 30, 2009. *521 David A. Rosenfeld, Esq., Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins, LLP Melville, NY, for In re Agria Corp. Securities Litigation. James Farrell, Esq., Latham & W

700 F.Supp.2d 566 (2010) In re MBIA, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION. Case No. 08-CV-264 (KMK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 31, 2010. *569 Steven B. Singer, Esq., Mark Lebovitch, Esq., Kurt Michael Hunciker, Esq., Jai Chandrasekhar, Esq., John James Rizio-Hamilton, Esq., Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP, N

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE MINDBODY, INC., § STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION § § No. 484, 2023 § § Court Below: Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware § § C.A. No. 2019-0442

MEMORANDUM TAURO, District Judge. Background In this case of alleged securities fraud, court-appointed Lead Plaintiffs Bruno Hofmann, John Bowie, Richard Madigan, and Richard Conen seek to recover damages on behalf of a class of investors. These investors allegedly lost money after purchasing the common stock of Organogenesis during the proposed class period of November 15, 1999

505 F.Supp.2d 501 (2007) In re MOTOROLA SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. 03 C 287. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. February 8, 2007. *502 *503 Deborah R. Gross, Christopher T. Reyna Law, Offices of Bernard M. Gross, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, Christopher B. Sanchez, Jennifer Wint