Cases

*715OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, United States District Judge Plaintiffs FKW Holdings and' Cesar Castillo (the “Direct Purchasers”) and Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund and American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan (the “End-Payors”) bring putative nationwi

*1198ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 75 LUCY H. KOH, District Judge Defendants DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc.; The Walt Disney Company; Lucasfilm Ltd., LLC; Pixar; ImageM-overs, LLC.; Two Pic MC LLC (f/k/a Ima-geMovers Digital); Sony Pictures Animation Inc.; Sony Pictures Imageworks Inc.; and Blue Sk

*1178ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Defendants DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc.; The Walt Disney" Company; Lucasfilm Ltd.,' LLC; Pixar;’ ImageM-overs, LLC; Two Pic MC LLC (f/k/a Ima-geMovers Digital); Sony Pictures Animation Inc.; Sony Pictures Imageworks Inc.; and Blue Sky Studios (col

*1053ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ REMAINING MOTIONS TO DISMISS Hon. Janis L. Sammartino, United States District Judge Presently before the Court are: (1) Defendant Thai Union Group PCL’s Motion to Dismiss (“TUG MTD”) (ECF No. 205) all claims asserted against Thai Union in the: (a) Consolid

(Re: Docket Nos. 71, 77) ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE PAUL S. GREWAL, United States Magistrate Judge *973Over two years ago, Plaintiffs1 filed this lawsuit against Defendant Google, Inc. for commingling user data across different Google products and disclosing

*1171ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Michael Devine, Mark Fichtner, Siddharth Hariharan, Brandon Marshall, and Daniel Stover (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), individually and on behalf of a class of all those similarly situated, allege antitrust claims against

CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS W. THRASH, JR., District Judge. This is a multidistrict litigation proceeding involving antitrust actions that are consolidated for pretrial proceedings. It is before the Court on Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc. and Paddock Laboratories, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Objective Baselessness [Doc. 555]1, Par Pharmaceuti

ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. Plaintiffs Michael Devine, Mark Fichtner, Siddarth Hariharan, Brandon Marshall, and Daniel Stover (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), individually and on behalf of a class of all those similarly situated, allege antitrust claims against their former employers, Adobe Systems Inc. (“Adobe”), Apple Inc. (“Apple”), G

LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Sarah Key, Andrew Westley, Terese Russell, and Carra Abernathy (collectively, "Plaintiffs") bring a putative class action against Defendant Qualcomm Incorporated ("Qualcomm"). Before the Court is Qualcomm's motion to dismiss and/or strike Plaintiffs' Consolidated Class Action Complaint ("CCAC"). ECF No. 110 ("Mot."). Having considered the parties' submissions, the relevant law, an

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE CELLULAR TELEPHONE ) COORDINATED C.A. No. 6885-VCL PARTNERSHIP LITIGATION ) THIS FILING APPLIES TO COORDINATED CIVIL ACTIONS 6886 AND 6908 MEMORANDUM OPINION ADDRESSING CLAIMS FOR BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY IN CONNECTION WITH FREEZE-OUT OF MINORITY PARTNERS IN SALEM CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY Date Submitted: January 11, 2022

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) IN RE BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED ) C.A. No. 2019-0638-AGB MERGER LITIGATION ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: July 16, 2020 Date Decided: October 27, 2020 Ned Weinberger and Thomas Curry, LABATON SUCHAROW LLP,

*1211ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 116) JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants VIZIO Inc., VIZIO Holdings, Inc., VIZIO Inscape Technologies, LLC, and VIZIO Inscape Services, LLC (collective

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: Google Play Store Antitrust No. 24-6256 Litigation D.C. Nos. ______________________________ 3:21-md-02981-JD _ 3:20-cv-05671-JD EPIC GAMES, INC., a Maryland Corporation, OPINION Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GOOGLE LLC; GOOGL

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN RE GOOGLE INC. STREET VIEW No. 20-15616 ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS LITIGATION, D.C. No. 3:10-md-02184- CRB BENJAMIN JOFFE; LILLA MARIGZA; RICK BENITTI; BERTHA DAVIS; JASON TAYLOR; ERIC MYHRE; JOHN OPINION E. REDSTONE; MATTHEW BERLAGE; PATRICK KEYES; KARL H. SCHU

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-3010 (APM) ) GOOGLE LLC,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-3010 (APM) ) GOOGLE LLC,

TREVOR N. McFADDEN, U.S.D.J. This case is brought by conservative activists who allege that America's major technology firms have conspired to suppress *34their political views. The Plaintiffs raise non-trivial concerns. But because they have failed to tie these concerns to colorable legal claims, the Court must dismiss their Amended Complaint.<

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS William Alsup, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION In this action claiming breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, defendants move to dismiss the second *1118amended complaint. For the reasons stated below, the motion is Granted. STATEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FREEDOM WATCH, INC. et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:18-cv-02030 (TNM) GOOGLE, INC. et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case is brought by conservative activists who allege that America’s major technol

O'Malley, Circuit Judge. *1185 This copyright case returns to us after a second jury trial, this one focusing on the defense of fair use. Oracle America, Inc. ("Oracle") filed suit against Google Inc. ("Google") 1 in the United