Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN RE ALPHABET, INC. SECURITIES No. 20-15638 LITIGATION, D.C. No. 4:18-cv-06245- STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, Office of JSW the Rhode Island Treasurer on behalf of the Employees’ Retirement System of Rhode Island; Lead OPINION Plaintiff, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Sim

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC. ) Consol. C.A. No. 2018-0816-JTL CLASS V STOCKHOLDERS LITIGATION ) OPINION ON FEE AWARD AND INCENTIVE AWARD Date Submitted: April 19, 2023 Date Decided: July 31, 2023 Ned Weinberger, Mark Richardson, Brendan W. Sullivan, Casimir O. Szustak, LABATON SUCHAROW LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Dominic Minerva, Joseph Cotilletta, Nathaniel Blakney, LA

OPINION & ORDER SIDNEY H. STEIN, District Judge. In August, this Court approved the settlement of this securities class action, which was brought on behalf of a class of purchasers of bonds issued by or on behalf of Citigroup, Inc. and raised claims pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933. Plaintiffs agreed to settle all claims in exchange for a payment of $730 million — an agreement that th

OPINION STRINE, Chancellor. I. Introduction This case presents a novel question of law. Here, MacAndrews & Forbes — a holding company whose equity is solely owned by defendant Ronald Perelman— owned 43% of M & F Worldwide (“MFW”). MacAndrews & Forbes offered to purchase the rest of the corporation’s equity in a going private merger for $24 per share. But upfront, MacA

HONORABLE RÉBECCA F. DOHERTY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CONTENTS I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND . . 488 A. Prior to Establishment of MDL 2299...488 B. Establishment of MDL 2299.. .489 C. State Court Proceedings... 492 D. Procedural History Prior to Bellwether Trial.. .493 E. Discovery, Preparation

*1053ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ REMAINING MOTIONS TO DISMISS Hon. Janis L. Sammartino, United States District Judge Presently before the Court are: (1) Defendant Thai Union Group PCL’s Motion to Dismiss (“TUG MTD”) (ECF No. 205) all claims asserted against Thai Union in the: (a) Consolid

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOYCE HENS GREEN, Senior District Judge. Pending in this Court are seven consolidated, but uncertified, class action lawsuits alleging securities fraud against the Baan Company, N.V. (“the Company”) and certain of its officers and directors. The Company is a Netherlands corporation with offices in Re-ston, Virginia and the Netherlands. The Company sells enterprise r

802 F.Supp.2d 740 (2011) In re VIOXX PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. This Document Relates To All Cases. MDL No. 1657. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. August 9, 2011. *758 ORDER & REASONS ELDON E. FALLON, District Judge. The Court has previously determined the value of the common bene

758 F.Supp.2d 638 (2010) In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: All Cases. Cause Nos. 3:05-MD-527 RM, MDL-1700. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. December 13, 2010. *653 OPINION and ORDER ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., Distri

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PAUL A. MAGNUSON, District Judge. Target Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss the Consumer Plaintiffs’ First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint (Docket No. 258) in the Consumer Cases. For the reasons that follow, the Motion is granted in part and denied in part. BACKGROUND This case arises out of one of the largest breaches of payment-c

OPINION PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. INTRODUCTION..........................................................10 II. BACKGROUND............................................................11 A. The Alleged Conspiracy..........

OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. In November 2010, El Paso Corporation (“El Paso Parent”) sold member interests in three limited liability companies to El Paso Pipeline Partners,- L.P. (the “Partnership” or “El Paso MLP”). At the time of the sale, El Paso Parent controlled El Paso MLP through its- ownership of El Paso Pipeline GP Company, L.L.C., the sole g

501 F.Supp.2d 789 (2007) In re VIOXX PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1657. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. August 14, 2007. As Revised September 4, 2007. Elisabeth French, Pittman, Hooks, Dutton, Dirby & Hellums, Birmingham, AL, Russ M. Herman, Leonard A. Davis, Herman, Herman, Katz & Cotlar, LLP, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff.

OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. Respondent Dell Inc. completed a merger (the “Merger”) that gave rise to appraisal rights. A stockholder only can pursue án appraisal if-the stockholder “neither voted in favor of the merger ... nor consented thereto in writing.” 8 Del. C. § 262(a) (the “Dissenter Requirement”). The appraisal statute defi

779 F.Supp. 1063 (1990) In re WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM SECURITIES LITIGATION. MDL No. 551. United States District Court, D. Arizona. November 16, 1990. *1064 *1065 *1066 *1067 *1068

16-977-cv, 16-3549-cv In re: DeRogatis 16-977-cv, 16-3549-cv In re: DeRogatis United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term, 2017 (Argued: November 1, 2017 Decided: September 14, 2018)

KEVIN J. CAREY, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE *4Recitals A. On December 4, 2018 (the "Solicitation Date"). Maremont Corporation ("Maremont") and its affiliated debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the "Debtors") in the above-captioned chapter 11 cases (the "Chanter

*108MEMORANDUM DECISION ON DEBTOR’S RENEWED MOTION TO HOLD CREDITOR NATIONS-TAR MORTGAGE IN CONTEMPT AND FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATION OF THE DISCHARGE INJUNCTION 11 U.S.C. § 524(a)(2)1 Honorable Mike K. Nakagawa, United States Bankruptcy Judge On April 26, 2016 and May 3, 2016, an evidentiary hearing was conducted on the Debto

DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEBTOR’S MOTION TO HOLD WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. IN CONTEMPT FOR VIOLATION OF DEBTOR’S DISCHARGE INJUNCTION Alan S. Trust, United States Bankruptcy Judge Pending before the Court is the motion of debtor, Thomas Haemmerle, (“Debtor”), *20seeking to hold Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) in civil contempt

918 F.Supp. 1190 (1996) In re AMINO ACID LYSINE ANTITRUST LITIGATION. (This Document Relates to All Actions). No. 95 C 7679[1]. MDL No. 1083. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. January 18, 1996. Bailey, Harring & Peterson, James S. Bailey, Jr., Denver, CO, Bainbridge & Straus, Philippa McC. Bainbridge, Michael Straus, Birmi