Cases

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER P. KEVIN CASTEL, District Judge. In a 175-page, 862-paragraph complaint, plaintiff In Touch Concepts, Inc. (“Zcom”) brings this action against defendants. The complaint is neither “short” nor “plain” as required by Rule 8(a)(2), Fed.R.Civ.P. Counsel for plaintiff is cautioned to be mindful of the mandates of Rule 8(a) in any pleading filed in a federal forum. But for the proce

O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge. The world has come a long way; this is a patent case about robots. InToueh Tech *1332 nologies, Inc. d/b/a InTouch Health (“In-Touch”) and VGo Communications, Inc. (“VGo”) both manufacture remote telepresence robot systems. In 2012, InTouch filed a First Amended Complaint

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE EDGIO, INC. STOCKHOLDERS ) CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 2022-0624-MTZ MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: January 20, 2023 Date Decided: May 1, 2023 Gregory V. Varallo and Daniel E. Meyer, BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMAN LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Mark Lebovitch, BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMAN LLP, New York, New

311 F.Supp.2d 1048 (2004) NOBODY IN PARTICULAR PRESENTS, INC., Ogden Resurrection Project, Inc., Swank Management, Inc., and N.I.P.P., LLC, Plaintiffs, v. CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., SFX Entertainment, Inc., d/b/a Clear Channel Entertainment, Clear Channel Broadcasting Inc., Jacor Broadcasting of Colorado, Inc., Citicasters Co., Citicasters Licenses, Inc., and Tsunami Communications, Inc., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 01 N

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE AMC ENTERTAINMENT ) HOLDINGS, INC. STOCKHOLDER ) Consol. C.A. No. 2023-0215-MTZ LITIGATION ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: July 26, 2023 Date Decided: August 11, 2023 Gregory V. Varallo, Daniel E. Meyer, BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMAN LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Mark Lebovitch, Edward Timlin,

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE FACEBOOK, INC. : CONSOLIDATED SECTION 220 LITIGATION : C.A. No. 2018-0661-JRS MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: March 7, 2019 Date Decided: May 30, 2019 Samuel L. Closic, Esquire of Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware and Frank R. Schirripa, Esquire and Daniel B. Rehns, Esquire of Hach Rose S

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE FACEBOOK, INC. : CONSOLIDATED SECTION 220 LITIGATION : C.A. No. 2018-0661-JRS MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: March 7, 2019 Date Decided: May 30, 2019 Revised: May 31, 2019 Samuel L. Closic, Esquire of Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware and Frank R. Schirripa, Es

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: Google Play Store Antitrust No. 24-6256 Litigation D.C. Nos. ______________________________ 3:21-md-02981-JD _ 3:20-cv-05671-JD EPIC GAMES, INC., a Maryland Corporation, OPINION Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GOOGLE LLC; GOOGL

326 F.Supp.2d 1060 (2003) VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff, v. RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P., a California Limited Partnership, Defendant. No. 01-CV-09871 RGK(RCX). United States District Court, C.D. California. June 23, 2003. *1061 *1062

SUSAN ILLSTON, United States District Judge Before the Court are the parties' post-trial motions (Dkt. Nos. 648, 649, 650, 661, 662, 666), plaintiffs' motion for a permanent injunction (Dkt. Nos. 660, 666), and two administrative motions to seal (Dkt. Nos. 684, 697). After hearing argument and considering the parties' materials, the Court rules as follows.

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0199p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ATRICURE, INC., │ Plaintiff-Appellee,

USCA11 Case: 21-11521 Date Filed: 05/24/2022 Page: 1 of 33 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-11521 ____________________ OJ COMMERCE, LLC, NAOMI HOME, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus KIDKRAFT, INC., MIDOCEAN PART

PROST, Circuit Judge, concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part. I join the majority opinion with respect to many of the issues discussed therein. However, I respectfully dissent with respect to the proper construction of the “heuristic” claim terms in the '949 patent. Additionally, I dissent from the majority’s decision to vacate the district court’s grant of summary judgment

586 S.E.2d 170 (2003) 214 W.Va. 95 VERIZON WEST VIRGINIA, INC., et al., Petitioners Below, Eastern Associated Coal Corporation, Appellant, v. WEST VIRGINIA BUREAU OF EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS, WORKERS' COMPENSATION DIVISION, Respondent Below, Appellee. Verizon West Virginia, Inc., et al., Petitioners Below, Weirton Steel Corporation, Appellant, v. West Virginia Bureau Of Employment Programs, Workers' Compensa

368 B.R. 140 (2007) In re ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP., et al., Debtors. No. 02-41729 (REG). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. January 3, 2007. *141 *142 Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP by Myron Trepper, Esq., Roger D. Netzer, Esq., Paul V. Shalhoub, Esq., Marc Abrams, Esq., Brian E. O'

PROST, Chief Judge. Apple Inc. appeals from a final judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, in which a jury found that Apple infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 6,502,135 (“'135 patent”), 7,418,504 (“'504 patent”), 7,490,151 (“'151 patent”), and 7,921,211 (“'211 patent”). The jury further found that none of the infringed claims were invalid and awarded da

Case: 21-1989 Document: 34 Page: 1 Filed: 05/20/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MITEK SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2021-1989 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Di

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Martha Ammons brings suit against Ally Financial, Inc. ("Ally"), under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA"), 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq. This case arises out of hundreds of debt-collection telephone calls that Ammons claims Ally made to her

Case: 21-1989 Document: 34 Page: 1 Filed: 05/20/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MITEK SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2021-1989 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Di

J. PAUL OETKEN, United States District Judge *246In these five related cases, one of which is a putative derivative and class action, a collective total of over 500 offshore investors ("Plaintiffs") who acquired shares in the Lifetrade Fund, B.V. ("Lifetrade") and two related funds (collectively, the "Lifetrade Funds") seek relief for the evaporation of their investmen