Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “In The Matter of Liang-Houh Shieh”
In re Liang-Houh Shiehpublic domain
Motion to vacate this Court’s December 8, 2016 dismissal order denied [see 28 NY3d 1122 (2016)]. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
Comm on Prof'l. Standards. v. Shieh (In re Shieh)public domain
Appeal dismissed without costs, by the Court sua sponte, upon the ground that, as to the appeal from the June 2018 Appellate Division order, no appeal lies from this order from which an appeal has already been taken and dismissed (see Matter of Liang-Houh Shieh, 32 N.Y.3d 1083,
In re Liang-Houh Shiehpublic domain
Motion for leave to appeal, etc., dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie.
In re Liang-Houh Shiehpublic domain
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that appellant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iii) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iii]). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
In re Liang-Houh Shiehpublic domain
Per Curiam. Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1983. He resides in Taiwan. Respondent was admitted to the California Bar in 1987. By order of the Supreme Court of California filed April 2, 1997, he was disbarred in that State. Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, moves to reciprocally discipline respondent, who has filed papers and cross-motions in opposition.
Matter of Shiehpublic domain
Matter of Shieh (2018 NY Slip Op 04634) Matter of Shieh 2018 NY Slip Op 04634 Decided on June 21, 2018 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 43
In Re Liang-Houh Shiehpublic domain
738 A.2d 814 (1999) In re Liang-Houh SHIEH, Respondent. A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. No. 97-BG-1991. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued September 14, 1999. Decided October 7, 1999. Hamilton P. Fox, III, Washington, DC, for respondent, by appointment of the Board on Professional Responsibility. Micha
In Re Liang-Houh Shiehpublic domain
OPINION INTRODUCTION On July 7, 1993, this court issued a written order to Liang-Houh Shieh (Shieh) to show cause before this court on July 28 why we should not declare him to be a vexatious litigant as defined by Code of Civil Procedure section 391, subdivision (b)(4), and issue a prefiling order pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 391.7, subdivision (a), prohibiting him fr
Shieh v. Kakitapublic domain
Per Curiam. In these three petitions for certiorari, pro se petitioner Liang-Houh Shieh requests leave to proceed in forma pau-peris under Rule 39 of this Court. We deny his requests pursuant to Rule 39.8. Shieh is allowed until April 22, 1996, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38 and to submit his petitions in compliance with this Court’s Rule 33.1. We also direct the Clerk not to acc
JACK B. SCHMETTERER, Bankruptcy Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION The matter before the Court is Fairly Bike Mfg Co.’s (“Fairly Bike”) motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 15, 2000 order denying its earlier motion to amend and vacate the default judgment entered against it herein over three years ago (“Motion to Amend”). The Motion to Amend was denied after determination that the argument for
248 B.R. 328 (2000) In re SCHWINN BICYCLE CO., et al., Debtor. Schwinn Plan Committee, Plaintiff, v. AFS Cycle & Co., Ltd., et al., (Fairly Bike Mfg. Co., Ltd.), Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 92-B-22474 to 92-B-22482. Adversary No. 94-A-01618. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. May 15, 2000. *329
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON COMMITTEE MOTION TO REVOKE DR. SHIEH PRO HAC VICE STATUS AND ON MOTIONS FILED BY DR. SHIEH JACK B. SCHMETTERER,' Bankruptcy Judge. This matter is before the Court on motion of Schwinn Plan Committee to revoke the pro hac vice admission of Dr. Liang-Houh Shieh (“Dr. Shieh”), which earlier permitted him to appear as Taiwan counsel for Defendant Fairly Bike Manufacturing Co., Lt
204 B.R. 13 (1997) In re SCHWINN BICYCLE CO., et al., Debtors. SCHWINN PLAN COMMITTEE, Plaintiff, v. AFS CYCLE & CO., LTD., et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 92 B 22474 to 92 B 22482, Adversary No. 94 A 01618. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. January 17, 1997. *14 Howard Feller and Dion W
Kinney v. Clarkpublic domain
Filed 5/17/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE CHARLES KINNEY, B265267 Cross-complainant and (Los Angeles County Appellant, Super. Ct. No. BC354136) v. MICHELE R. CLARK, Cross-defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los A
Hupp v. Solera Oak Valley Greens Ass'npublic domain
CODRINGTON, J. *1303I INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Aristea Hupp (Aristea) appeals judgment entered after the trial court granted defendants Solera Oak Valley Greens Association and City of Beaumont Animal Control Officer Jack Huntsman's1 ex parte application to dismiss Aristea's first a
Hupp v. Solera Oak Valley Greens Assn.public domain
Filed 6/23/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO ARISTEA HUPP, Plaintiff and Appellant, E065766 v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1512779) SOLERA OAK VALLEY GREENS OPINION ASSOCIATION et al., Defendants an
Kinney v. Clarkpublic domain
Filed 6/14/17 Unmodified opinion attached CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE CHARLES KINNEY, B265267 Cross-complainant and (Los Angeles County Appellant, Super. Ct. No. BC354136) v. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
Kinney v. Clarkpublic domain
CHANEY, J. *726Charles Kinney appeals from a post-judgment award for attorney fees and costs Michele Clark incurred in a prior appeal while attempting to enforce an earlier award for attorney fees and costs against Kinney. Kinney has been challenging Clark's entitlement to fees and costs in this action since 2008, when the trial court first awa
Doran v. Vicorp Restaurants, Inc.public domain
407 F.Supp.2d 1115 (2005) Jerry DORAN v. VICORP RESTAURANTS, INC., ET AL. No. SACV 04-506 JVS. United States District Court, C.D. California. June 27, 2005. *1116 Lynn Hubbard, III, Scottlynn J. Hubbard, IV, Law Offices of Lynn Hubbard, Chico, CA, for Plaintiffs. Lorraine Middleton, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants.
190 B.R. 599 (1995) In re SCHWINN BICYCLE COMPANY, et al., Debtors. SCHWINN PLAN COMMITTEE, Plaintiff, v. AFS CYCLE & COMPANY, LIMITED, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 92 B 22474 to 92 B 22484. Adv. No. 94 A 01618. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 13, 1995. *600