Cases

Petition for rehearing denied.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 19-BG-0587 IN RE WILLIAM E. WALLACE, RESPONDENT. A Member of the Bar of the Distric

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.

ORDER hThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) is conducting an investigation into allegations that respondent, in her capacity as the property manager of a condominium association, embezzled funds from the association’s bank account. Respondent now seeks to permanently resign from the practicó of law in lieu of discipline. The ODC has concurred in respondent’s petition. Having considered the Petition for Perman

Petition dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: This case comes before the court on a petition for writ of mandamus filed by Stephen Wallace under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771 (“CVRA”). The CVRA affords to victims of crime the rights to reasonable protection from the accused, to notice

|, ORDER Considering the Joint Petition for Interim Suspension filed by respondent, Kenneth T. Wallace, and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, IT IS ORDERED that Kenneth T. Wallace, Louisiana Bar Roll number 25920, be and he hereby is suspended from-the practice of law on an- interim basis pursuant- to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19.3, pending further orders of this court. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX,' § 26(E

Per curiam. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on a Notice of Discipline seeking the disbarment of Stephen Bailey Wallace II (State Bar No. 734309) based on his violations of Rules 1.3, 1.4, 1.16 (d), 8.4 (a) (4), and 9.3 of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct. See Bar Rule 4-102 (d). The maximum sanction for a violation of Rules 1.3 and 8.4 (a) (4) is disbarment, while the maximum sanction for a violation of R

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00491-CV ___________________________ IN RE WALLACE WAYNE BOWMAN, JR., Relator Original Proceeding 97th District Court of Montague County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021-0355M-CV Before Bassel, Birdwell, and Walker, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMOR

Voluntary resignation accepted and name removed from roll of attorneys. Present — Smith, J.E, Fahey, Carni, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ. (Filed Oct. 16, 2014.)

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00231-CV ___________________________ IN RE WALLACE WAYNE BOWMAN, JR., Relator Original Proceeding 97th District Court of Montague County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020-0339M-CV Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. The Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District served the respondent with a verified petition dated December 29, 2010, containing 13 charges of professional misconduct. After a hearing, the Special Referee sustained all 13 charges. The Grievance Committee now moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee and to impose such discipline upon the respondent as the

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. The Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District served the respondent with a verified petition dated December 29, 2010, containing 13 charges of professional misconduct. After a hearing, the Special Referee sustained all 13 charges. The Grievance Committee now moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee and to impose such discipline upon the respondent as the

PUBLISHED ORDER ACCEPTING RESIGNATION AND CONCLUDING PROCEEDING A “Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action” against Respondent was filed on January 29, 2013. Respondent has now tendered to this Court an affidavit of resignation from the bar of this State, pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23(17), which requires an acknowledgement that the material facts alleged are true and that Respondent could not successfu

Per curiam. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the report and recommendation of special master Andrew W. Jones, who recommends dismissal of the formal complaint filed against Michael B. Wallace (State Bar No. 734183). The formal complaint charged that Wallace violated Rules 1.2 (a), 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 (a), 1.16 (a), 1.16 (d), and 3.2 of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, see Bar Rule 4-102 (d), in connection wi

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, Wallace E appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Richmond County (Sacco, J.), dated August 21, 2013, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated June 6, 2013, made after a hearing, finding that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have *889constituted the crimes of attemp

961 N.E.2d 999 (2012) In the Matter of William R. WALLACE, Respondent. No. 26S00-1112-DI-700. Supreme Court of Indiana. January 27, 2012. PUBLISHED ORDER OF INTERIM SUSPENSION UPON NOTICE OF GUILTY FINDING The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23(11.1)(a), files a "Notice of Guilty Findin

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, Wallace E appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Richmond County (Sacco, J.), dated August 21, 2013, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated June 6, 2013, made after a hearing, finding that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have *889constituted the crimes of attemp

453 B.R. 78 (2011) In re Willie W. WALLACE and Janice M. Wallace, Debtors. No. 10-22697. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York. May 12, 2011. Thomas A. Corletta, Rochester, NY, for Debtors. DECISION & ORDER JOHN C. NINFO, II, Bankruptcy Judge. BACKGROUND On November 9, 2010, Willie W. Wallace and Janice M. W

MEMORANDUM OPINION Phyllis M. Jones, United States Bankruptcy Judge Before the Court is the Second Amended Complaint to Determine Dischargeability of Debt (the “Complaint”) filed by the Debtor, Alice Wallace (“Ms. Wallace” or the “Debtor”) on September 17,2015 (Doc. No. 6), and the Answer to the Complaint (the “Answer”) filed by the Defendant, the United States Department of Education (t