Cases

EFiled: Jan 25 2024 02:30PM EST Filing ID 71876477 Case Number Multi-Case IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE FOX CORPORATION § /SNAP INC. SECTION 242 § Nos. 120 &121, 2023 LITIGATION § (Consolidated) §

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE FOX CORPORATION § /SNAP INC. SECTION 242 § Nos. 120 &121, 2023 LITIGATION § (Consolidated) § § Court Below: Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware § § C.A. Nos. 2022-1007; 2022-

James R. Sacca, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge The primary issue before the Court is what are the respective interests of the estate and a judgment creditor in cash deposited with the state court pre-petition in lieu of a supersedeas bond when the debtor loses on appeal and all applicable time periods related to the appeal expire post-petition. This issue arose out of Snap Line Services, Inc. ("Snap Line")'s Motion f

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE MATCH GROUP, INC. § DERIVATIVE LITIGATION § No. 368, 2022 § § Court Below: Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware § § C.A. No. 2020-0505 § CONSOLIDATE

RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge. The plaintiffs bring this class action on behalf of all persons who purchased common stock from Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”) during the period from October 22, 1998 through October 7; 1999, alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). The plaintiffs bring their claims under Sections 10(b) an

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE AMC ENTERTAINMENT ) HOLDINGS, INC. STOCKHOLDER ) Consol. C.A. No. 2023-0215-MTZ LITIGATION ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: July 26, 2023 Date Decided: August 11, 2023 Gregory V. Varallo, Daniel E. Meyer, BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMAN LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Mark Lebovitch, Edward Timlin,

527 F.Supp.2d 728 (2007) In re PROQUEST SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. 06-10619. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. November 6, 2007. *729 *730 David H. Fink, E. Powell Miller, Marc L. Newman, The Miller Law Firm, Rochester, MI, Joel B. Strauss, Kaplan, Fox, New York, NY, Marc

ORDER RE MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff filed a putative class action against LDK Solar Company, two of its subsidiaries and several of its officers and directors claiming violations of the Securities Exchange Act. Plaintiff alleges that defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions relating to LDK’s reported inventory of po

20-1458 (L) In re Platinum and Palladium Antitrust Litigation In the United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT AUGUST TERM 2020 Nos. 20-1458, 20-1575, 20-1611 IN RE PLATINUM AND PALLADIUM ANTITRUST LITIGATION KPFF INVESTMENT, INC., WHITE OAK FUND LP, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, LARRY HOLLIN, P

OPINION STRINE, Chancellor. I. Introduction On this motion to dismiss, plaintiff stockholders argue that they have stated a claim for breach of fiduciary duty because a controlling stockholder refused to consider an acquisition offer that would have cashed out all the minority stockholders of the defendant Synthes, Inc., but required the controlling stockholder to remain as an

ORDER J.P. Stadtmueller, U.S. District Court This is a patent case about lithium-ion batteries used in power tools.' Before the Court are the parties’ claim construction briefs and their cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the Court adopts Plaintiffs’ proposed claim construction in all respects. The Court further finds that Snáp-On ha

174 F.Supp.2d 61 (2001) In re: INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: All Cases No. 21 MC 92(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 7, 2001. *62 Melvyn I. Weiss, Esq., Ariana J. Tadler, Esq., Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, Stanley Bernstein, Esq., Robert Berg, Esq.,

483 F.Supp.2d 947 (2007) In re CNET NETWORKS, INC. Shareholder Derivative Litigation. This Document Relates To: All Actions. No. C 06-03817 WHA. United States District Court, N.D. California. April 11, 2007. *948 Darren J. Robbins, Travis E. Downs, III, William S. Lerach, Benny Copeline Goodman, III, Kathleen Ann Herkenhoff, Lerach C

MEMORANDUM DECISION Timothy A. Barnes, United States Bankruptcy Judge This matter comes on for consideration on the Purchaser’s Motion for Entry of an Order (I) Enforcing Confirmation Order; (II) Directing Dismissal of State Court Claims; (III) Awarding Damages; and (TV) Granting Related Relief [Dkt. No. 3969] (the “Motion”) brought by TRG Venture Two, LLC (“TRG”), the successor to a purchaser of assets f

ORDER TIMOTHY C. BATTEN, SR., District Judge. The case is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion to reopen discovery and for a new case schedule as to Defendants Delta Air Lines and AirTran Holdings, Inc., and for sanctions against Delta [294].1 I. The Gist of the Case On December 5, 2008, Delta and Air-Tran started charg

648 F.Supp.2d 663 (2009) In re PENNSYLVANIA TITLE INSURANCE ANTITRUST LITIGATION. Civil Action No. 08-01202. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. July 21, 2009. *665 Barbara J. Felt, Vincent J. Esades, Heins Mills & Olson PLC, James S. Reece, Richard M. Hagstrom, Aaron M. McParlan, Michael E. Jacobs, Zelle Hofmann Voelbel

983 F.2d 1015 Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,146In re SURE-SNAP CORPORATION, Debtors.Elaine J. SHURE, Sure-Snap Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.The STATE OF VERMONT Acting By and Through the VERMONTINDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, State StreetBank and Trust Company, Defendants,Bradford National Bank As Trustee of Two IndustrialDevelopment Revenue Bonds issued by the VermontIndustrial Development Authority,Bradford

EFiled: May 26 2017 11:52AM EDT Transaction ID 60650885 Case No. 10782-VCS IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : IN RE APPRAISAL OF PETSMART, INC. : CONSOLIDATED : C.A. No. 10782-VCS MEMORANDUM OPINI

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF SEPARATE PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 8958 BARTLE, District Judge. Plaintiffs Janet Mitchell and her husband Stephen Mitchell and Julie Sandoval and her husband Arthur Sandoval filed this lawsuit in the Superior Court of California against defendants Pfizer, Inc., Wyeth, Inc., Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Wyeth Holding Corp. (‘Wyeth”) and McKesson Corporation (McKesson).

352 F.Supp.2d 1279 (2005) In re: TERAZOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE ANTITRUST LITIGATION No. 99-MDL-1317. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. January 5, 2005. *1280 *1281 *1282 *1283 *1284 Mitch