Cases

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 17, 2021 Decided March 26, 2021 No. 20-7110 IN RE: LARRY ELLIOTT KLAYMAN, RESPONDENT Larry Klayman argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent. Before: HENDERSON and TATEL, Circuit Judges, and EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL. TATEL, Circuit Jud

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 18-BG-0100 IN RE LARRY KLAYMAN A Member of the Bar of the District of

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 24-BG-0689 IN RE LARRY KLAYMAN, RESPONDENT. A Suspended Member of the Bar of the

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 20-BG-583 IN RE LARRY E. KLAYMAN, RESPONDENT. A Suspended Member of the Bar of the Distr

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2023 Decided June 11, 2024 No. 22-7123 LARRY ELLIOTT KLAYMAN, APPELLANT v. JULIA PORTER, ET AL., APPELLEES Consolidated with 23-7120 Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of C

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued August 10, 2022 Decided September 9, 2022 No. 21-5269 LARRY ELLIOTT KLAYMAN, APPELLANT v. NEOMI RAO, HON., ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:21-cv-02473)

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 10, 2020 Decided July 30, 2021 No. 19-7105 LARRY KLAYMAN, APPELLANT v. JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:06-cv-00670

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 4, 2014 Decided August 28, 2015 No. 14-5004 BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. LARRY ELLIOTT KLAYMAN, ET AL., APPELLEES ______ Consolidated with 14-5005, 14-5016, 14-5017 ______ Appeal from

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) LARRY ELLIOT KLAYMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 22-953 (RBW) ) JULIA PORTER, et al., )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LARRY E. KLAYMAN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 21-cv-02473 (CRC) THE HONORABLE NEOMI RAO, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Larry E. Klayman, proceeding pro se, filed this action against the judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for D

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LARRY KLAYMAN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-1579 (RDM) HAMILTON FOX, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Larry Klayman’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order dismiss

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LARRY KLAYMAN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-2209 (RDM) ESTHER LIM, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Larry Klayman, proceeding pro se, brings this action against the District of Columbia Bar and its president, E

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) LARRY ELLIOT KLAYMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-3109 (RBW) ) JULIA PORTER, et al., )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LARRY KLAYMAN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-2209 (RDM) ESTHER LIM, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Larry Klayman’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order d

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LARRY KLAYMAN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-1579 (RDM) HAMILTON FOX, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Larry Klayman, proceeding pro se, brings this action against the D.C. Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”)

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 24-CV-0366 LARRY KLAYMAN, APPELLANT, V. BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESP

¡MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge Our Circuit Court has remanded this case for me to determine whether limited discovery is appropriate to satisfy the standing- requirements set forth by the Supreme Court in an earlier national security surveillance case: Clapper v. Amnesty International USA,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LARRY KLAYMAN, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 18-1579 (RDM) v. HAMILTON FOX, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Request for Voluntary Recusal. See Dkt. 4. For the reasons below, the Court will DENY