Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN K. GAUVEY, United States Magistrate Judge. The issue before the Court is the government’s authority to prospectively acquire precise location information derived from cellular and Global Positioning System (“GPS”) technology (collectively “location data”) to aid in the apprehension of the subject of an arrest warrant. The government has reported no attempts of the subject

ACCEPTED 01-15-00567-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/14/2015 12:29:57 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

*238OPINION OF THE COURT Stein, J. In this matter, we are asked to determine the appealability of two Supreme Court orders. The first order denied Facebook, Inc.’s motion to quash certain warrants, issued pursuant to the Federal Stored Communications Act, that sought the account information and communications of various Facebook subscribers in connect

Commissioner of the N.Y. State Dept. of Transp. v Polite (2024 NY Slip Op 06023) Commissioner of the N.Y. State Dept. of Transp. v Polite 2024 NY Slip Op 06023 Decided on December 4, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Connolly, J.P.<

*327REID, Associate Judge: These consolidated cases, involving reciprocal discipline of two members of the District of Columbia Bar, respondents Howard L. Greenspan and Leslie D. Sil-verman, require us to determine whether the Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers and the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland are “disciplining court[s]” within the meaning of

449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri

ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6061835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

07/15/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 21, 2021 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ALONZO HOSKINS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 111103 Bobby R. McGee, Judge ___________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ' THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Stay the Order and Restore the Preliminary Injunction Pending Appeal, filed October 4, 2016 (Doc. 123)(“Motion to Stay MOO”);. (ii) the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Brief, filed November 2,2016 (Doc. 140)(“Suppl. Brief Motion”); and (ii

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Defendants Susana Martinez, Jeremiah Ritchie, Jeffrey S. Landers, Salvatore Maniaci, Paulette Becker, Robert M. Doughty III, and Carl E. Londone’s Motion to Dismiss Count IV on the Basis of Qualified Immunity, filed December 4, 2015 (Doc. 60)(“Qualified Immunity Motion”); (ii) Defenda

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Opinion Clifford W. Taylor Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Opinion Clifford W. Taylor Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver

MARKMAN, J. (dissenting). I respectfully dissent. The majority here expands the “casino exception” to representative government that it effectively established in Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v Michigan, 471 Mich 306; 685 NW2d 221 (2004) (TOMAC I). Pursuant to this exception, in the realm of Indian casinos: (1) the Legislature may approve legislation by som

Corrigan, C.J. In this declaratory action, we must determine: (1) whether House Concurrent Resolution (HCR) 115 (1998), the Legislature’s approval by resolution of tribal-state gaming compacts, constituted “legislation” and therefore violated Const 1963, art 4, § 22; (2) whether the compacts’ amendatory provision providing that the Governor may amend the compacts without legislative

STROUD, Judge. Defendant Trevor Wilks Forte ("defendant") appeals from his conviction of trafficking more than 14 grams, but less than 28 grams, of heroin by possession and of trafficking more than 14 grams, but less than 28 grams, of heroin by transportation. On appeal, defendant argues that his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches was violated because the trial court a

At about 3:30 a.m. on the morning of October 12, 2005, defendant and three of his friends, after spending the night drinking at a club, were involved in an altercation with a club promoter, which ended with the arrival of police. As they walked to their cars, one of defendant’s friends was hit on the head with a broken bottle, sustaining a cut. Records of cell tower transmissions disclosed that defendant and one companion first drove south toward his apar

People v Riche (2024 NY Slip Op 00785) People v Riche 2024 NY Slip Op 00785 Decided on February 14, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department LaSalle, P.J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau

People v Riche (2024 NY Slip Op 00785) People v Riche 2024 NY Slip Op 00785 Decided on February 14, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Fabrice Riche Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau

Opinion RUSHING, P. J. This original proceeding arises from efforts by real party in interest Navalimpianti USA, Inc. (Navalimpianti), to obtain copies of e-mail messages stored by real party in interest Google, Inc. (Google), on behalf of petitioner Matteo Negro. Navalimpianti caused a subpoena to be served on Google, which Negro moved to quash. Respondent

OPINION OF THE COURT Matthew A. Sciarrino, Jr., J. Twitter, Inc. (Twitter) seeks to quash the January 26, 2012 subpoena issued by the New York County District Attorney’s *870Office and upheld by this court’s April 20, 2012 order. That order required Twitter to provide any and all user information, including email addresses, as well as any and all t