Cases

OPINION GOULD, Circuit Judge: We must decide what proof a defendant seeking removal must produce to prove the amount-in-controversy requirement under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d), when the complaint does not include a facially apparent amount in controversy or the plaintiff may have understated the true amount in

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MATTHEW D. GREENE, an individual, No. 20-55281 on behalf of himself, the proposed class(es), all others similarly D.C. No. situated, and on behalf of the general 5:19-cv-01647- public, RGK-KK Plaintiff-Appellee, v. OPINION HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC., a Wisconsin corporation;

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 13 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LEVONE HARRIS, on behalf of himself No. 20-16767 and all others similarly situated,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TAMARA MOORE; GRETA L. ERVIN; No. 18-15026 RAFF ARANDO; NICHOLS SMITH; RENEE EDGREN; CYNTHIA WELTON, D.C. No. on behalf of themselves and all 3:16-cv-07001- others similarly situated, MMC Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION MARS PETCARE US, INC.; NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY; HILL’S PET

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND Re: Dkt. Nos. 37, 42 Ronald M. Whyte, United States District Judge Plaintiff Daniel Garza filed a class action complaint in Monterey County Superior Court on April 16, 2015, alleging that defendants failed to provide meal and rest periods, failed to pay premium wages for unprovided meal and rest periods, failed to pay at least minimum wages for all hours

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS. (Docs. 5, 6) Lawrence J. O’Neill, UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Plaintiff David Dobbs’ Motion to Remand, filed June 23, 2016 (Doc. 6). On July 19, 2016, Defendant The Wood Group PSN, Inc. (“The Wood Group”) timely filed its Opposition (Doc.

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Jeffrey Adkins brought this action against defendants J.B. Hunt Transport, *1143Inc. ("J.B. Hunt") and Does 1-20 based on plaintiff's employment with defendant and subsequent termination. Before the court is plaintiff's Motion to remand (Docket No. 6) and defendant J.B. Hunt's Motion t

ORDER DENYING REMAND SAMUEL CONTI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION The Court turns now to a motion by Plaintiffs to remand this case to State Court. ECF No. 15 (“Mot.”). The motion challenges the original notice of removal,1 *1159is fully briefed,2 and is app

OPINION GOULD, Circuit Judge: With this appeal pending, we decided Ibarra v. Manheim Investments, Inc., 775F.3d 1193, No. 14-56779 (9th Cir. Jan. 8, 2015), filed simultaneously with this opinion, and addressed what proof a defendant seeking removal must produce to prove the amount in controversy requirement under the Class Action Fai

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND Re: Dkt. No. 13 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, United States Magistrate Judge Before the Court is Hughes’ motion to remand this action to state court. Because the Court agrees that defendants have not met their burden to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy exceeds $5 million, the Court GRANTS Hughes’ motion to remand.

Hon. Dana M. Sabraw, United States District Judge Pending before the Court is Plaintiff John Bryant's motion to remand. Defendant NCR Corporation filed an opposition. Plaintiff did not file a reply. For the following reasons, the motion is denied. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff was formerly employed by Defendant as a customer engineer. On November 13, 2017

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BLANCA ARGELIA ARIAS, No. 19-55803 individually and on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 2:18-cv-08818- RGK-JPR v. RESIDENCE INN BY MARRIOTT, a OPINION Delaware li

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge Evna T. LaVelle and Lavenia LaVelle," the plaintiffs in this putative class action, filed suit in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (“Superior Court”) against the defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”), álleging that “State Farm breached its insuran

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ACADEMY OF COUNTRY MUSIC, a No. 20-55589 California nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-03046- v. RGK-JC CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, OPINION Defendant-Appellant, and DOES, 1

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED - STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION On September 30, 2016, Plaintiffs Candice Ritenour and Cheryl Weiser filed this putative class action in California Superior Court, County of Orange, against Defendant Carrington Mortgage Services LLC and Does 1 through 100, inclusiv