⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Ian Keith Humphrey”

State v. Wildenbergpublic domain
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998-01-28 · Published · cited 10× · 573 N.W.2d 692; 1998 Minn. LEXIS 40; 1998 WL 30233
573 N.W.2d 692 (1998) STATE of Minnesota, Appellant, v. Lyf Christian WILDENBERG, Respondent. No. CX-96-652. Supreme Court of Minnesota. January 28, 1998. *693 Mark Nathan Lystig, Asst. Ramsey County Atty., Hubert H. Humphrey III, Atty. Gen., for appellant. Birrell & Dunlap, Ltd., Andrew S. Birrell, Ian A. J. Pitz, Min
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023-05-31 · Published · cited 0× · 2023 OK 59
HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY2023 OK 59Case Number: 120981Decided: 05/31/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 59, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019-04-10 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Apr 10 2019, 8:29 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK court except for the purpose of establishing Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals the defense of r
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023-05-31 · Published · cited 10× · 2023 OK 59
HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY2023 OK 59Case Number: 120981Decided: 05/31/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 59, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. TASSIE KATHERINE
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023-05-31 · Published · cited 1× · 2023 OK 59
OSCN Found Document:HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017-12-19 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Dec 19 2017, 5:32 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral Court of Appeals
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2023-12-27 · Published · cited 0×
12/27/2023 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 15, 2023 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. WILLIAM JAMES ANDREWS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Williamson County No. M-CR210102 James G. Martin, III, Judge __________________
North Carolina Business Court · 2018-06-04 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 NCBC 52
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC v. AG Ins. SA/NV, 2018 NCBC 52A (Corrected 06-05- 2018). STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 17 CVS 5594 DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC and DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON DUKE’S
Zarro v. Spitzerpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008-04-18 · Published · cited 13× · 274 F. App'x 31
SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff appeals from the December 6, 2006 decision and order of the district court dismissing his amended complaint (“Complaint”) in its entirety. In his Complaint, Plaintiff raised thirteen claims for relief. Counts 1 and 121 alleged that multiple defendants abused process, violated Plaintiffs rights under the Thirteenth Amendment, and deprived him of equal protection of the laws by investig
District Court, S.D. New York · 2017-06-14 · Published · cited 17× · 256 F. Supp. 3d 355
OPINION & ORDER [CORRECTED] ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Defendant Benjamin Wey faces an eight-count indictment charging him with securities fraud, wire fraud,-conspiracy to commit securities and wire fraud, money laundering, and failure to disclose beneficial ownership of publicly traded companies. Before the Court is Wey’s motion to suppress evidence seized during Government searches of his res
United States Court of International Trade · 2004-11-15 · Published · cited 11× · 358 F. Supp. 2d 1244; 28 Ct. Int'l Trade 1879; 28 C.I.T. 1879; 27 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1045; 2004 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 143
358 F.Supp.2d 1244 (2004) FAUS GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Slip Op. 04-143, Court No. 03-00313. United States Court of International Trade. November 15, 2004. *1245 *1246 McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP (Peter Buck Feller, Daniel G. Jarcho, Washington, DC, and Brett Ia
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025-08-22 · Published · cited 0×
23-1162-cv; 23-1344-cv Nat’l Ass’n for Gun Rights v. Lamont; Grant v. Rovella In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ________ AUGUST TERM 2024 ARGUED: OCTOBER 16, 2024 DECIDED: AUGUST 22, 2025 Nos. 23-1162, 23-1344 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS, TO
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-08-01 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1037 MICHELLE R. GILBANK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WOOD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District C
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-08-01 · Published · cited 58× · 111 F.4th 754
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1037 MICHELLE R. GILBANK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WOOD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District C
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-08-01 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1037 MICHELLE R. GILBANK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WOOD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District C
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-01-31 · Published · cited 67× · 881 F.3d 75
KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Effective 1789, we Americans “set up government by consent of the governed.” W. Va. State Bd. of Educ. v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 641, 63 S.Ct. 1178, 87 L.Ed. 1628 (1943). Under the United States Constitution, all of the federal government’s power derives from the people. U.S. Const. pmbl.; see McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S.
Ohio Supreme Court · 2002-07-01 · Published · cited 1× · 2002 Ohio 3343
[Cite as 07/01/2002 Case Announcements, 2002-Ohio-3343.] The Supreme Court of Ohio CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS July 1, 2002 DISCIPLINARY CASES 2001-0412. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Cleary. Patricia A. Cleary is reinstated to the practice of law. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS 2002-0902. Butcher v. Lewis. Stark App. No. 2001CA00219, 2002-Ohi
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025-04-23 · Published · cited 1× · 135 F.4th 1271
USCA11 Case: 24-10139 Document: 59-1 Date Filed: 04/23/2025 Page: 1 of 111 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-10139 ____________________ BRUCE HENRY,
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009-02-12 · Published · cited 2× · 447 B.R. 475; 61 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1312; 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 672; 51 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 73
447 B.R. 475 (2009) In re CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-35653. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. February 12, 2009. Robin S. Abramowitz, Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., Melville, NY, for *476 Bond Circuit VIII Delaware Business Trust. Angela Sheffler Abreu, McCarter
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1924-06-02 · Published · cited 0× · 164 Ark. 556; 262 S.W. 644; 1924 Ark. LEXIS 427
Humphreys, J. This suit was brought in the circuit court of Franklin County, Charleston District, by appellee against appellant, to recover damages under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, on account of personal injuries received through the alleged negligence of fellow-servants. The alleged acts of negligence contained in the complaint are as follows: That, in operating its trains under th