Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 23-091-2 (CKK) JIN GUANGHUA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 19, 2025) Defendant Jin Guanghua faces a twelve-count indictment charging him with participation in a bank-fraud, sa

OPINION AND ORDER WOLSKI, Judge. This case arises under the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-13 (2000) (“CDA”), out of a contract between the defendant and the plaintiff surety company (“Travelers”). The contract in question concerned the construction of the United States Department of Agriculture’s (“USDA’s”) Vegetable Laboratory in Charleston, South Carolina. The case results from the con

ACCEPTED 01-15-00373-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/10/2015 5:13:17

OPINION CHRISTOPHER M. KLEIN, Bankruptcy Judge: Franz Kafka.lives. This automatic stay violation case reveals that he works at Bank of America, *571The mirage of promised mortgage modification lured the plaintiff debtors into a kafkaesque nightmare of stay-violating foreclosure and unlawful detainer, tardy foreclosure rescission

660 F.3d 665 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Mahmoud Reza BANKI, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 10-3381-cr. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: February 15, 2011. Decided: October 24, 2011. *667 E. Danya Perry, Assistant United States Attorney (Katherine Polk Failla, Assistant U

10-3381-cr United States v. Banki UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2010 (Argued: February 15, 2011 Decided: October 24, 2011) (Amended: February 21, 2012) Docket No. 10-3381-cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Ap

10-3381-cr United States v. Banki UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2010 (Argued: February 15, 2011 Decided: October 24, 2011) (Amended: February 21, 2012) Docket No. 10-3381-cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Ap

10-3381-cr United States v. Banki UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2010 (Argued: February 15, 2011 Decided: October 24, 2011) (Amended: February 21, 2012 and February 22, 2012) Docket No. 10-3381-cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

CHIN, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant Mahmoud Reza Banki (“Banki”) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York convicting him, following a jury trial, of (1) conspiracy to violate the Iranian Transactions Regulations (the “ITR”) and operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business; (2) violating the ITR; (3) operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business; and (4)

403 F.Supp.2d 57 (2005) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Robert E. QUINN, Michael H. Holland, Mohammed A. Sharbaf Defendants. No. CRIM.05-0018 JDB. United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 5, 2005. *58 *59 Jay I. Bratt, Laura A. Ingersoll, Office of the U.S. Attorney for the Dis

401 F.Supp.2d 80 (2005) UNITED STATES of America v. Robert E. QUINN, Michael H. Holland, Mohammed A. Sharbaf, Defendants. No. CRIM. 05-0018(JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 21, 2005. Amended November 23, 2005. *81 *82 Jay I. Bratt, Laura A. Ing

ACCEPTED 05-15-00161-CV 05-15-00161-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 2/9/2015 3:21:23 PM NO.

ACCEPTED 15-25-00016-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/11/2025 3:55 PM No. 15-25-00016-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6061835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 04-15-00525-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 12/2/2015 4:11:00 PM

531 F.Supp.2d 1381 (2008) In re: MARINE HOSE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II). No. MDL 1888. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. January 28, 2008. Before JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman, D. LOWELL JENSEN, ROBERT L. MILLER, JR. DAVID R. HANSEN, J. FREDERICK MOTZ, KATHRYN H. VRATIL, ANTHONY J. SCIRICA[*], Judges of the Panel. TRANSFE

849 N.E.2d 473 (2006) Steve BONNEY, John Gibson, Anita Gibson, Tom Pietrzak, Randy Nace, Clarinda Nace, June Nace, and the Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc., an Indiana not for profit Corp., Appellants (Plaintiffs below), v. INDIANA FINANCE AUTHORITY, Statewide Mobility Partners, LLC, ITR Concession Company, LLC, the Indiana Department of Transportation, Mitchell E. Daniels, Governor of Indiana, and Tim Berry, Treasurer of Indiana, Appel

SHWARTZ, Circuit Judge. *288 Plaintiffs are individuals and members of groups who pay tolls to travel on the Pennsylvania Turnpike. 1 They allege that Pennsylvania state entities and officials ("Defendants") have violated the dorm

OPINION LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Editor Note: The paragraphs related to headnotes 1-105 are found on the supplemental pieces of this opinion on Westlaw. Part 1 is 2014 WL 815553; Part 2 is 2014 WL 815613; Part 3 is 2014 WL 815715; Part 4 is 2014 WL 815869 [Head-notes 1-2]; Part 5 is 2014 WL 815923 [Headnotes 3-51]; Part 6 is 2014 WL 815961 [Headnotes 52-87]; Part 7 is 2014 WL 816086 [Headnotes 88-

OPINION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: Before the Court are a number of separate actions (the “Judgment Creditor actions” or “turnover actions”) brought by judgment creditors (“Judgment Creditors”) of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran (the “Government of Iran”). The Judgment Creditors seek to enforce their judgments against property owned by defendants the Alavi Foundation (“A