Cases

Case: 24-1965 Document: 76 Page: 1 Filed: 01/29/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., AMGEN USA, INC., BIOCON BIOLOGICS INC., CELLTRION, INC., FORMYCON AG, AMGEN INC., Defendants SAMSUNG BIOEPIS CO., LTD., Defendant-A

OPINION THOMPSON, JUDGE: Jane M. Mefford appeals from a summary judgment dismissing her medical malpractice claim against Norton Hospitals, Inc., d/b/a Norton Audubon Hospital, based on the doctrine of judicial estoppel. The trial court concluded Jane intentionally failed to disclose the existence of her pending malpractice action to the bankruptcy court prior to it granting a Chapter 7 dischar

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PLASTIC OMNIUM ADVANCED INNOVATION AND RESEARCH, Plaintiff-Appellant v. DONGHEE AMERICA, INC., DONGHEE ALABAMA, LLC, Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2018-2087 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Distr

Case: 21-1729 Document: 47 Page: 1 Filed: 12/08/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ASTRAZENECA AB, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., KINDEVA DRUG DELIVERY L.P., Defendants-Appellants ______________________ 2021-1729

Case: 21-1729 Document: 47 Page: 1 Filed: 12/08/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ASTRAZENECA AB, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., KINDEVA DRUG DELIVERY L.P., Defendants-Appellants ______________________ 2021-1729

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER ARTHUR D. SPATT, United States District Judge This case arises from the refusal by the Defendants Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. (“Endonovo”) and Alan Collier (“Collier” and collectively, the “Defendants”) to comply with a request by the Plaintiff Vis Vires Group, Inc. (the “Plaintiff’) to convert $15,000 of the $66,000 in principal remaining due under promissory notes issu

FERREN, Senior Judge: This appeal invites us to interpret and apply the Tenants’ Opportunity to Purchase Act (TOPA), 1 which authorizes an organization of tenants, under prescribed conditions, to purchase their building even though another party, such as a land developer, had already contracted to do so. In this case, a d

Preliminary Injunction; Judgment on the Administrative Record; Competition in Contracting Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3553(d)(3); Bid Protest; Solicitation; Override; Stay; Residential Re-Entry Services OPINION AND ORDER SWEENEY, Judge Before the court in this bid protest is plaintiff Bannum, Inc.’s motion for a preliminary injunc

15-25-00021-CV ACCEPTED 15-25-00021-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/28/2025 8:28 PM No. _____________________ CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE ___________________________________________

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SUNLINE COMMERCIAL CARRIERS, INC., Plaintiff, V. C.A. N0. N15C-03-051 WCC CCLD CITGO PETROLEUM ) ) ) ) ) § CORPC)RATION, ) ) ) Defendant. Submitted: July 20, 2017 Decided: Decernber 27, 2017 Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment - GRANTED IN PART Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment - DENIED MEMORANDUM OPINION Michael F. Bonkowski, Esquire & Nicholas J. Brannick, Esquire, Cole Schotz P.C., 500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1410 Wilmington, D

MEMORANDUM Joan N. Feeney, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION The matter before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Trustee’s Complaint filed by LexMar Global Inc. (“LexMar” or the “Defendant”) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. *1012(b).(l). LexMar also sought dismissal un-der Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(7), but requested that the Cou

OPINION STOWERS, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION In 2007, Deborah Kyzer Ivy, a shareholder of Calais Company, Inc. (Calais), filed a complaint against Calais seeking involuntary corporate dissolution. In May 2009, Ivy and Calais reached a settlement agreement (Agreement) in which Calais agreed to purchase Ivy's shares at "fair value" as dete

ACCEPTED 14-15-00401-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/4/2015 12:45:30 PM

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE GRANTING “MOTION TO LIFT AUTOMATIC STAY TO PERMIT ARBITRATION OF CLAIMS” COMBINED WITH RELATED OR-DERS AND NOTICE OF THE EN-TRY THEREOF David S. Kennedy, UNITED STATES CHIEF BANKRUPTCY JUDGE INTRODUCTION This core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) and (G) arises out of a “Mo*866tion To Lift Automa

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ DOMINION RESOURCES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. __________________________ 2011-5087 __________________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in Case No. 08-CV-195, Judge Charles F. Lettow

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION [274] DAVID O. CARTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (“Mot.”) (Dkt.274). *342I. Background This lawsuit is a putative securities fraud class action against Defendants Electronic Game Card, Inc. (“EGC”), L

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 23-3202 COINBASE, INC., Petitioner v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION On Petition for Review of Securities and Exchange Commission Order (No. 4-789) _____________________________ Argued on Septem

694 F.Supp.2d 1039 (2010) CRAIGSLIST, INC., Plaintiff, v. NATUREMARKET, INC., et al., Defendants. No. C 08-5065 PJH. United States District Court, N.D. California. March 5, 2010. *1045 Brian Patrick Hennessy, Perkins Coie LLP, Menlo Park, CA, Elizabeth L. McDougall, Perkins Coie LLP, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff. <

OPINION FABE, Chief Justice. I. INTRODUCTION This case involves the assessed value of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System for property tax purposes. On appeal from the Alaska State Department of Revenue and the State Assessment Review Board, the superior court conducted a trial de novo to assess the value of the pipeline by calculating its replacement cost and then accounting for depreciation. T

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER John J. Tharp, Jr., United States District Judge The plaintiff, Doctor’s Data, Inc. (“DDI”), brings a claim under § 43 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125, as well as state law claims for defamation and related torts against Stephen J. Barrett, M.D. (“Barrett”), the National Council Against Health Fraud, Inc. (“NCAHF”), and Quackwateh, Inc. (“Quackwateh”). This opinion address