Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
16 opinions for “IRIZARRY v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION”
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Lancepublic domain
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Lance (2021 NY Slip Op 04252) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Lance 2021 NY Slip Op 04252 Decided on July 7, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Kadingpublic domain
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Kading (2022 NY Slip Op 02255) HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Kading 2022 NY Slip Op 02255 Decided on April 6, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary La
U.S. Bank N.A. v. Karnabypublic domain
U.S. Bank N.A. v Karnaby (2021 NY Slip Op 00451) U.S. Bank N.A. v Karnaby 2021 NY Slip Op 00451 Decided on January 27, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
U.S. Bank N.A. v. Beymerpublic domain
U.S. Bank N.A. v Beymer (2020 NY Slip Op 02871) U.S. Bank N.A. v Beymer 2020 NY Slip Op 02871 Decided on May 14, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Jud
VILLANTI, Judge. CCM Pathfinder Palm Harbor Management, LLC (Pathfinder), seeks review of the order dismissing with prejudice its complaint as to six of the many defendants *6in this foreclosure case, , We agree with Pathfinder that dismissal of its complaint based on the statute of limitations defense was improper because the facts supporting such a defense were outside
Dollase v. Wanu Water Inc.public domain
Filed 7/28/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT STEVEN DOLLASE, B314900 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19STCV19368) v. WANU WATER INC., Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a postjudgment order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.
Wiltshire v. Dhanrajpublic domain
421 F.Supp.2d 544 (2005) Eleanor WILTSHIRE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Edward DHANRAJ, et al., Defendants. No. 03-CV-2856 (DLI)(VVP). United States District Court, E.D. New York. September 14, 2005. *545 *546 Gary Scott Rosen, Gary Rosen Law Firm, Floral Park, NY, for Plaintiffs. A. Kathlee
Fritz v. Resurgent Capital Services, LPpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BLOCK, Senior District Judge: Plaintiffs assert claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p, and New York General Business Law (“GBL”) § 349. Defendants move to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Because defendants urge numerous grounds for dismissa
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CCM PATHFINDER PALM HARBOR ) MANAGEMENT, LLC, ) ) Appellant, )
Good v. United States Department of Educationpublic domain
Appellate Case: 22-3286 Document: 105-1 Date Filed: 11/12/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 12, 2024
Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Arrillaga-Torrénspublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER Delgado-Hernández, District Judge. The Federal Deposit and Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) as receiver of Euro-bank, initiated this action against Euro-bank’s former Directors, related spouses and conjugal partnerships to recover approximately $55 Million in losses that it attributes to the Directors’ gross negligence in approving twelve “obviously risky and deficiently underwritten” unpaid
United States v. Amayapublic domain
SENTENCING OPINION AND STATEMENT OF REASONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c) MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS J. INTRODUCTION........................................................899 A. The Charges........................................................899 B. The Trials.........................................
Brown v. City of Barrepublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFFS’ CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docs. 110, 114) CHRISTINA REISS, Chief Judge. This matter comes before the court on the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant City of Barre, Vermont (the “City”) (Doc. 110) and the cross-motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff
Gonzalez-Camacho v. Banco Popular De P.R.public domain
DANIEL R. DOMÍNGUEZ, United States District Judge Pending before the Court are twelve (1) Motions to Dismiss and one (1) separate Motion to Joinder: (1) Defendant Banco Popular's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Docket No. 96); (2) Defendant Scotiabank's Motion to Dismiss under Rules 12(b)(6) (Docket No. 99); (3) Firstbank's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Docket No. 103); (4) Motion to Dismiss F
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Farva Jafri v. Civil No. 1:22-cv-0039-JL Opinion No. 2022 DNH 127 New Hampshire Supreme Court Committee on Character and Fitness, et al. MEMORANDUM ORDER The pro se plaintiff in this case, Farva Jafri, is a licensed attorney who all
In Re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust Litigationpublic domain
618 F.3d 300 (2010) In re INSURANCE BROKERAGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION OptiCare Health Systems, Inc., Comcar Industries, Inc., Sunburst Hospitality Corporation, Robert Mulcahy, Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District, Glenn Singer, Redwood Oil Company, Omni Group of Companies, Bayou Steel Corporation, Clear Lam Packaging, Inc., Cellect, LLC, Enclave, LLC, Gateway Club Apartments, Ltd., Michigan Multi-King, Inc., City of Stamford, Belmont