⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

16 opinions for “IRIZARRY v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION”

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-07-07 · Published · cited 0× · 146 N.Y.S.3d 840; 2021 NY Slip Op 04252
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Lance (2021 NY Slip Op 04252) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Lance 2021 NY Slip Op 04252 Decided on July 7, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022-04-06 · Published · cited 5× · 165 N.Y.S.3d 595; 204 A.D.3d 649; 2022 NY Slip Op 02255
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Kading (2022 NY Slip Op 02255) HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Kading 2022 NY Slip Op 02255 Decided on April 6, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary La
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-01-27 · Published · cited 1× · 136 N.Y.S.3d 886; 190 A.D.3d 1005; 2021 NY Slip Op 00451
U.S. Bank N.A. v Karnaby (2021 NY Slip Op 00451) U.S. Bank N.A. v Karnaby 2021 NY Slip Op 00451 Decided on January 27, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-05-14 · Published · cited 0× · 124 N.Y.S.3d 25; 183 A.D.3d 454; 2020 NY Slip Op 2871
U.S. Bank N.A. v Beymer (2020 NY Slip Op 02871) U.S. Bank N.A. v Beymer 2020 NY Slip Op 02871 Decided on May 14, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Jud
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015-01-21 · Published · cited 6× · 198 So. 3d 3; 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 641; 2015 WL 248796
VILLANTI, Judge. CCM Pathfinder Palm Harbor Management, LLC (Pathfinder), seeks review of the order dismissing with prejudice its complaint as to six of the many defendants *6in this foreclosure case, , We agree with Pathfinder that dismissal of its complaint based on the statute of limitations defense was improper because the facts supporting such a defense were outside
California Court of Appeal · 2023-07-28 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 7/28/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT STEVEN DOLLASE, B314900 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19STCV19368) v. WANU WATER INC., Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a postjudgment order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.
District Court, E.D. New York · 2005-09-14 · Published · cited 8× · 421 F. Supp. 2d 544; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41892; 2005 WL 2239972
421 F.Supp.2d 544 (2005) Eleanor WILTSHIRE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Edward DHANRAJ, et al., Defendants. No. 03-CV-2856 (DLI)(VVP). United States District Court, E.D. New York. September 14, 2005. *545 *546 Gary Scott Rosen, Gary Rosen Law Firm, Floral Park, NY, for Plaintiffs. A. Kathlee
District Court, E.D. New York · 2013-07-24 · Published · cited 28× · 955 F. Supp. 2d 163; 2013 WL 3821479; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103695
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BLOCK, Senior District Judge: Plaintiffs assert claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p, and New York General Business Law (“GBL”) § 349. Defendants move to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Because defendants urge numerous grounds for dismissa
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015-01-21 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CCM PATHFINDER PALM HARBOR ) MANAGEMENT, LLC, ) ) Appellant, )
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024-11-12 · Published · cited 20× · 121 F.4th 772
Appellate Case: 22-3286 Document: 105-1 Date Filed: 11/12/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 12, 2024
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2016-08-26 · Published · cited 10× · 212 F. Supp. 3d 312; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115139; 2016 WL 8346364
OPINION AND ORDER Delgado-Hernández, District Judge. The Federal Deposit and Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) as receiver of Euro-bank, initiated this action against Euro-bank’s former Directors, related spouses and conjugal partnerships to recover approximately $55 Million in losses that it attributes to the Directors’ gross negligence in approving twelve “obviously risky and deficiently underwritten” unpaid
District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013-06-11 · Published · cited 1× · 949 F. Supp. 2d 895; 2013 WL 2548393; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82274
SENTENCING OPINION AND STATEMENT OF REASONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c) MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS J. INTRODUCTION........................................................899 A. The Charges........................................................899 B. The Trials.........................................
District Court, D. Vermont · 2012-07-12 · Published · cited 3× · 878 F. Supp. 2d 469; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96738; 2012 WL 2873664
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFFS’ CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docs. 110, 114) CHRISTINA REISS, Chief Judge. This matter comes before the court on the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant City of Barre, Vermont (the “City”) (Doc. 110) and the cross-motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff
United States District Court · 2018-03-28 · Published · cited 11× · 318 F. Supp. 3d 461
DANIEL R. DOMÍNGUEZ, United States District Judge Pending before the Court are twelve (1) Motions to Dismiss and one (1) separate Motion to Joinder: (1) Defendant Banco Popular's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Docket No. 96); (2) Defendant Scotiabank's Motion to Dismiss under Rules 12(b)(6) (Docket No. 99); (3) Firstbank's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Docket No. 103); (4) Motion to Dismiss F
District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022-10-18 · Published · cited 1× · 2022 DNH 127
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Farva Jafri v. Civil No. 1:22-cv-0039-JL Opinion No. 2022 DNH 127 New Hampshire Supreme Court Committee on Character and Fitness, et al. MEMORANDUM ORDER The pro se plaintiff in this case, Farva Jafri, is a licensed attorney who all
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010-08-16 · Published · cited 882× · 618 F.3d 300; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17107; 2010 WL 3211147
618 F.3d 300 (2010) In re INSURANCE BROKERAGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION OptiCare Health Systems, Inc., Comcar Industries, Inc., Sunburst Hospitality Corporation, Robert Mulcahy, Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District, Glenn Singer, Redwood Oil Company, Omni Group of Companies, Bayou Steel Corporation, Clear Lam Packaging, Inc., Cellect, LLC, Enclave, LLC, Gateway Club Apartments, Ltd., Michigan Multi-King, Inc., City of Stamford, Belmont