Cases

991 F.Supp. 1193 (1998) In re WELLS FARGO SECURITIES LITIGATION. This Order Relates To All Actions. No. C-91-1944-VRW. United States District Court, N.D. California. January 20, 1998. *1194 Melvin R. Goldman, Jack W. Londen, Morrison & Foerster, San Francisco, CA, Jeffrey Ross, Friedman, Ross & Herst, San Francisco, CA, Druci

12 F.3d 922 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,007In re WELLS FARGO SECURITIES LITIGATION.Howard GREENWALD; Milton Friedman; Sheldon Shore; JohnPaul Decker; Fairmont Financial Corporation; Arthur-MagnaInc; Harold Bloch; Robert C. Schilling, on behalf ofthemselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.WELLS FARGO & CO., a Delaware Corporation; Carl E.Reichardt; Paul Hazen; Robert L. Joss; Clyd

ORDER DESIGNATING CLASS COUNSEL. WALKER, District Judge. On June 30, 1994, the court issued an order soliciting bids from all law firms interested in being designated class counsel in this securities action brought on behalf of purchasers of Wells Fargo common stock. In response, three firms have submitted proposals: Lieff, Cabraser & Heimann; Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach; and Lowey Dannenbe

ORDER WALKER, District Judge. The court held a status conference on June 24 to discuss the selection of class counsel for the balance of this litigation and the determination of how lawyers for the class should be compensated. On the plaintiff side were Richard Heimann of Lieff, Cabraser & Heimann and William Lerach of Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, whose firms to date have acted as de facto

PISANO, District Judge. This is a consolidated class action brought on behalf of all purchasers of common stock of the AremisSoft Corporation (“Aremis-Soft”). The First Amended and Consolidated Class Action Complaint (the “Complaint”) alleges that the Defendants issued false and misleading statements concerning Aremis-Soft’s earnings and streams of revenue during the Class Period, April 22, 1999 through July 27, 2001, inclus

256 F.Supp.2d 1227 (2003) In re CFS-RELATED SECURITIES FRAUD LITIGATION. 99-CV-825-K(J), 00-CV-111-K(J), 99-CV-828-K(J), 00-CV-839-K(J), 99-CV-829-K(J), 99-CV-862-K(J), 99-CV-863-K(J), 99-CV-864-K(J), 99-CV-873-K(J), 00-CV-104-K(J), 00-CV-205-K(J), 99-CV-874-K(J), 00-CV-110-K(J), 99-CV-889-K(J), 99-CV-919-K(J), 00-CV-837-K(J), 00-CV-847-K(J), 02-CV-531-K(J), 02-CV-591-K(J), 02-CV-961-K(J), 00-CV-73-P(J). Unite

22-943 In re Treasury Securities Auction Antitrust Litigation IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________ August Term, 2023 Argued: October 3, 2023 Decided: February 1, 2024 No. 22-943 _____

TROTT, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent, and I do so essentially because I believe our colleague on the district court had it right when he dismissed this complaint for failure to state a claim. I can do no better than repeat the essence of his analysis: In order to survive a motion to dismiss, plaintiffs who allege securities fraud must plead facts which, if true, c

*1110ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT William Alsup, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION In this securities action, defendants move to dismiss in three separate motions. For the reasons stated below, the motions are Granted in part and Denied in part. STATEMENT

*476MEMORANDUM & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, United States District Judge On June 16, 2016, the Court issued orders approving the plan of allocation of the net settlement fund and the class action settlement. Dkt. Nos. 123-24. The Court now addresses Lead Counsel’s application for attorney’s fees. For the reasons that follow, Counsel’s applic

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1495 Doc: 58 Filed: 08/21/2026 Pg: 1 of 42 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1495 CHRISTOPHER JOHN BILLESDON, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC, Defendant – Appellant.

712 F.Supp.2d 958 (2010) In re WELLS FARGO MORTGAGE-BACKED CERTIFICATES LITIGATION. No. C 09-01376 SI. United States District Court, N.D. California. April 22, 2010. *961 Betsy Carol Manifold, Francis M. Gregorek, Rachele R. Rickert, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, David Ronald Stickney, David Andrew Thorpe, Timothy Alan D

TRANSFER ORDER JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman. Before the Panel:* Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiffs in one District of Massachusetts action move to centralize this litigation in that district. The litigation consists of six actions pending in three districts, as listed on Schedule A.1 Since the filing of the motion, the Panel has been notified o

*70MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE These consolidated actions were brought pursuant to Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 against BHP Billiton Limited, BHP Billiton Pic (together, “BHP”), and certain of BHP’s officers and directors (the “Individual Defendants”, and, tog

*849Order Granting Dependants’ Motion to Dismiss Re: Dkt. No. 123 Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, United States District Court Judge Plaintiff Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, as lead plaintiff, brings this consolidated second amended complaint against defendants Nimble Storage, Inc. (“Nimble”), Suresh Vasudevan, Anup Singh, Varun Mehta,

Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge *871Plaintiffs Francesca Allen, John Sterling Ross, and Mary Lou Shank are current and former employees of Wells Fargo & Company ("Wells Fargo"). All of them held Wells Fargo stock in their 401(k) accounts. In September 2016, the price of that stock dropped sharply-and plaintiffs suffered significant losses-after Well

*740OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: These consolidated putative class actions involve claims that a Brazilian petrochemical company’s failure to disclose its long-*741running bribery scheme violated federal securities law. Plaintiffs are purchasers of purchas

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-2781 ___________________________ Francesca Allen, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and on behalf of the Wells Fargo & Company 401(k) Plan; John Sterling Ross, and all other individuals similarly situated; Mary Lou Shank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TIBEBE F. SAMUEL, Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 17-2539 (CKK) WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, et al., Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION (April 27, 2018) At the center of this lawsuit is the alleged decision of De

*991ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs have filed a class action against LeapFrog Enterprises Inc., and two of its officers, John Barbour (“Barbour”) and Raymond L. Arthur (“Arthur”), for violations of federal securities laws. Defendants’ motio