Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “IN RE STAMPS.COM, INC. STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION”
In Re Transunion Derivative Stockholder Litigationpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CONSOLIDATED IN RE TRANSUNION DERIVATIVE C.A. No. 2022-1103-LWW STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: June 7, 2024 Date Decided: October 1, 2024 Kevin M. Gallagher & Spencer V. Crawford, RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Sandr
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE PROASSURANCE CORP. ) STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE ) Consol. C.A. No. 2022-0034-LWW LITIGATION ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: June 6, 2023 Date Decided: October 2, 2023 Thomas A. Uebler, MCCOLLOM D’EMILIO SMITH UEBLER LLC, Wilmington, Delaware; Blake A. Bennett, COOCH AND TAYLOR, P.A.,
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE EZCORP INC. CONSULTING ) AGREEMENT DERIVATIVE ) C.A. No. 9962-VCL LITIGATION ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: October 27, 2015 Date Decided: January 25, 2016 Seth. D. Rigrodsky, Brian D. Long, Gina M. Serra, Jeremy J. Reilly, RIGRODSKY & LONG, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Nicholas I.
EFiled: Jan 25 2016 04:17PM EST Transaction ID 58474052 Case No. 9962-VCL IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE EZCORP INC. CONSULTING ) AGREEMENT DERIVATIVE ) C.A. No. 9962-VCL LITIGATION ) MEMORANDUM OPINION
OPINION & ORDER SWEET, District Judge. Pursuant to the transfer order from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the “MDL Panel”), entered on October 4, 2012, 41 actions stemming from the May 18, 2012 initial public offering (“IPO”) of Facebook, Inc. (“Face-book” or the “Company”) are presently before this Court. The instant motion relates to Plai
OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, UNITED . STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The above referenced putative class action alleges violations of the following securities -fraud statutes through ■ Defendants’ scheme to optimize revenue in investment banking fees from UBS Securities LLC’s corporate client, Enron Corp. (“Enron”), at the expense and defrauding of UBS Financial Service’s brokerage retail clients, Lead Plaint
398 F.Supp.2d 244 (2005) In re ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION SECURITIES AND DERIVATIVE LITIGATION. No. 03 MD 1529(LMM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 7, 2005. *245 *246 *247 Lawrence P. Kohler, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz
*827OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The above referenced securities-fraud, putative class action alleges material misrepresentations and omissions by Defendants regarding Key Energy Services, Inc.’s (“Key’s”) financial condition and the future of its business, leading to inflated stock prices in violation of §§ 10(b), co
Matter of Renren Inc. Derivative Litig. v. XXXpublic domain
IN RE RENREN, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION, Plaintiff, againstXXX, Defendant. Index No. 653594/2018 For the plaintiffs: Mark C. Zauderer and Jason Todd Cohen, Ganfer Shore Leeds & Zaudere LLP, 360 Lexington Ave, New York, NY 10017;Jennifer
OPINION STRINE, Chancellor. I. Introduction After receiving substantial discovery, both before and after abandoning an attempt to enjoin a tender offer and second-step merger between a corporation and an arm’s-length purchaser, the plaintiffs in this case filed a second amended complaint (the “Complaint”).1 The defendants have moved to dismiss the
In re Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. Securities Litigationpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs Omnibus Motion of (i) Leave to Amend the Consolidated Class Action Complaint and (ii) For Reconsideration of the Court’s January 27, 2010 Memorandum Opinion and Orders Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant’s Motions to Dismiss the Consolidated Amende
In Re WorldCom, Inc. Securities Litigationpublic domain
388 F.Supp.2d 319 (2005) In re WORLDCOM, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Nos. 02 Civ.3416, 02 Civ.3419, 02 Civ.3508, 02 Civ.3537, 02 Civ.3647, 02 Civ.2750, 02 Civ.3771, 02 Civ.4719, 02 Civ.4945, 02 Civ.4946, 02 Civ.4958, 02 Civ.4973, 02 Civ.4990, 02 Civ.5057, 02 Civ.5071, 02 Civ.5087, 02 Civ.5108, 02 Civ.5224, 02 Civ.5285, 02 Civ.8226, 02 Civ.8227, 02 Civ.8228, 02 Civ.8229, 02 Civ.8230, 02 Civ.8234, 02 Civ.9513, 02 Civ.9514, 02 Civ.9515,
In Re Metlife Demutualization Litigationpublic domain
689 F.Supp.2d 297 (2010) In re METLIFE DEMUTUALIZATION LITIGATION. No. 00 CV 2258. United States District Court, E.D. New York. February 12, 2010. *304 Stamell & Schager, LLP by Jared B. Stamell, Esq., New York, NY, Mandel & Mandel, LLP, by David S. Mandel, Esq., Miami, FL, Berman DeValerio, by Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr., Esq., San F
879 A.2d 604 (2005) In re COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION. CONS. C.A. No. 613-N. Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle County. Submitted: May 9, 2005. Decided: June 6, 2005. Joseph A. Rosenthal, Esquire, Rosenthal Monhait Gross & Goddess, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. Arthur N. Abbey, Esquire, Steph
In Re Intelligroup Securities Litigationpublic domain
527 F.Supp.2d 262 (2007) In re INTELLIGROUP SECURITIES LITIGATION. Civil Action No. 04-1980 (GEB). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. November 13, 2007. *263 *264 *265 *266 *267
In Re Intelligroup Securities Litigationpublic domain
468 F.Supp.2d 670 (2006) In Re INTELLIGROUP SECURITIES LITIGATION No. CIV.A. 04-4980(GEB). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. December 20, 2006. *671 *672 *673 *674 Joseph J. Depalma, Esq., Lite, Depalma, Greenberg &am;
In Re LaBranche Securities Litigationpublic domain
405 F.Supp.2d 333 (2005) In re: LABRANCHE SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. 03 Civ. 8201(RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 13, 2005. *334 *335 Schiffrin & Barroway, Bala Cynwyd, PA (David Kessler, Eric Lechtzin, of counsel), Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins, Mel
588 F.Supp.2d 1132 (2008) In re COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. CV-07-05295-MRP (MANx). United States District Court, C.D. California. December 1, 2008. *1142 OMNIBUS ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ALL PENDING REQUESTS FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE MARIANA R. PFAEL
In re Simon II Litigationpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. 1. Introduction This memorandum and order addresses plaintiffs’ application for class certification. See Third Amended Class Action Complaint and Supplemental Memorandum in Support Amended and Renewed Motion for Class Certification, dated July 26, 2002. Extensive briefing and argument by the parties on the issue have been con
235 F.Supp.2d 549 (2002) In re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & ERISA LITIGATION. This Document Relates to All Cases. Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants. The Regents of the University of California, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth L. Lay, et al., Defendants. MDL No. 1446 Civil Action No. H-01-36