Cases

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of - ) ) Skanska USA Civil Southeast, Inc. ) ASBCA Nos. 61220, 61347 ) Under Contract No. N40085-10-C-3006 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Arnie B. Mason, Esq. Williams Mull

USCA11 Case: 21-13850 Document: 88-1 Date Filed: 08/02/2023 Page: 1 of 40 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-13850 ____________________ SKANSKA USA CIVIL SOUTHEAST INC.

USCA11 Case: 24-12638 Document: 72-3 Date Filed: 04/15/2026 Page: 1 of 49 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-12638 ____________________ THE LANE CONSTRUC

USCA11 Case: 22-13691 Document: 76-1 Date Filed: 10/11/2024 Page: 1 of 34 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-13691 ____________________ WILLIAM HEATH HORNADY, CHRISTOPHER MILLER, TAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ABAYOMI KALEJAIYE, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 19-02647 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 86, 87, 88 : QUALIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RUBY FREEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 21-3354 (BAH) RUDOLPH W. GIULIANI., Judge Beryl A. Howell Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorize “[l]ib

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Helen E. Burris, US Bankruptcy Judge, District of South Carolina THIS MATTER came before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”) filed by Defendant Frederick Richard Thoennes, III (“Thoennes”)1 and the Objection of Plaintiff Andrew P. Ballard (“Ballard”).2 Ballard’s Complaint, filed a

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT VICTOR A. BOLDEN, UNITED ■ . STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Table of Contents I. Introduction... 242 II. Factual Allegations,. .243 A. State Foreclosure Proceedings. . .244 B. Mortgage Modification Requests ...245 C. Other Correspondence between the Tanasis

USCA11 Case: 22-12461 Document: 55-1 Date Filed: 05/01/2024 Page: 1 of 15 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-12461 ____________________ J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC.,

OPINION DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: Appellees Wheeling Hospital and Belmont Hospital (collectively “the hospital plaintiffs”), along with other medical providers, commenced this putative class action in West Virginia state court on May 19, 2010, against the Ohio Valley Health Services and Education Corporation, Ohio Valley Medical Center and East Ohio Regional H

Nora Barry Fischer, United States District Judge *573I. INTRODUCTION This diversity action arises from a business arrangement between an architectural/engineering design management company, Defendant Jacobs Engineering Group ("Jacobs"), and a manufacturer which specializes in the custom design and fabrication of hangar doors, P

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge FLOYD wrote the opinion, in which Judge KEENAN and Judge HARRIS joined. FLOYD, Circuit Judge: In this Title VII employment discrimination action, Brenda Butler seeks to recover for sexual harassment she allegedly experienced while working at a Drive Automotive Industries (Drive) factory. In the proceeding be

Opinions of the United 2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-6-2007 Ehleiter v. Grapetree Shores Inc Precedential o

545 F.Supp.2d 533 (2008) Carol Holder BRATCHER, Plaintiff, v. PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT, INC., Defendant. No. 5:07-CV-451-D. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division. April 7, 2008. *536 Annette Exum, Exum Law Group, Rose Marie Pahl, Raleigh, NC, for Plaintiff. Michael Murchison, Andrew

OPINION OF THE COURT (April 6, 2007) After litigating this case before the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands (“Superior Court”) for nearly four years, Appellant Grapetree Shores, Inc. (“GSI”) moved to stay the court proceedings pending arbitration pursuant to Section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”). The Superior Court denied the motion, finding that

*1040Order Re Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint and Motion to Stay Case MARIANA R. PFAELZER, District Judge. 7. Background The plaintiffs in this litigation (collectively, “AIG” or “Plaintiffs”) purchased hundreds of residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) worth tens of billions of dollars between 2005 an

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 12, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-0793 Lower Tribunal No. 20-26469 ________________ Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Appellant,

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS BURROUGHS, District Judge. Plaintiffs Lisa Siegel Belanger and Devora C. Kaiser (“plaintiffs”) filed their Complaint in this action on February 12, 2015 [Docket No. 1]. The Complaint is 462 pages long and contains 2767 numbered paragraphs. Plaintiffs attached 393 separate exhibits to their Complaint, which were filed with the Court and served on the defen

22-1377-cv Hoffer v. Tellone In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ________ AUGUST TERM 2024 ARGUED: SEPTEMBER 11, 2024 DECIDED: FEBRUARY 13, 2025 No. 22-1377 RICHARD HOFFER, Plaintiff–Appellant,

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: Newmont Mining Corporation brings this action against three related corporate *730entities-collectively, "AngloGold"1 -and one individual, Wayne Chancellor, for various claims arising from Newmont's purchase of a gold mine in Colorado. There are currently three motions pe