Cases

*31 Memorandum Opinion Re Document Nos.: 21, 49 RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge Granting Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss I. INTRODUCTION This securities fraud class action litigation come

551 F.Supp.2d 247 (2008) In re TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 06 CV. 803(SWK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 16, 2008. *252 OPINION AND ORDER SHIRLEY WOHL KRAM, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND ........

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE ANTHEM-CIGNA ) Consolidated MERGER LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 2017-0114-JTL MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: March 9, 2020 Date Decided: August 31, 2020 William M. Lafferty, Kevin M. Coen, D. McKinley Measley, Zi-Xiang Shen, Thomas P. Will, Daniel T. Menken, MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNEL

91 F.Supp.2d 678 (2000) In re ULTRAFEM INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. 98 Civ.1900(LAP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 6, 2000. *679 *680 *681 *682 *683 Arthur N. Abbey,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case, arising under the federal antitrust laws and state analogues, presents a *240challenge to the use of reverse payment settlements in patent litigation. Reverse payment settlements are agreements to settle patent infringement litigation under which t

429 F.3d 370 In Re: TAMOXIFEN CITRATE ANTITRUST LITIGATIONJoblove, Allied Servs., Div Welfare Fund, Bennish, Koonan, Great Lakes Health Plan Inc., Lacava, Donega, Smith, Lovinger, Woollacott, Whiteside, Platt, Underwood, Teamsters Local 237, Lynch, Callaway, Maloney, Mechanical Contract, Ibew-Neca Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan, A.F. of L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Fund, Sheet Metal Workers Local 441 Health & Welfare Plan, Local 1

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES Consolidated STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION C.A. No. 2020-0707-KSJM MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: February 5, 2021 Date Decided: February 26, 2021 Gregory V. Varallo, BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael J. Barry, Christine M. Mackintosh, Kelly L. Tucker, GR

ON REHEARING EN BANC PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2486 In re: DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, in his official capacity and in his individual capacity, Petitioner. ---------------------------------------------------

OPINION AND ORDER KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge. Appellant-Cross-Appellee Pick & Za-bicki LLP (“Appellant” or “P & Z”) ap*257peals from an order (the “Fee Order”) entered in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (Glenn, J.) awarding fees to P & Z for profes

442 B.R. 421 (2009) In re Marcia Y. BURTON, Respondent. In re Charmaine Hernandez, Debtor. Nos. 08-00301, 07-31579. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. January 23, 2009. *427 Marcia Y. Burton, Charlotte, NC, pro se, for Debtor. Marcia Y. Burton, Charlotte, NC, for Debtor. ME

Opinions of the United 2008 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-24-2008 In Re:MansarayRuffin Precedential or Non-Prece

Burgess, J. ¶ 1. The State appeals from the Chittenden Criminal Division’s denial of its motion to seal search warrants and related materials generated during an ongoing investigation into a missing Essex couple. The court determined that the State failed to show with specificity, as required under In re Sealed Documents, that disclosure would cause “substantial harm to public or private interests.” 172 Vt. 152, 153, 772

720 F.Supp.2d 367 (2010) SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Jon-Paul RORECH and Renato Negrin, Defendants. No. 09 Civ. 4329 (JGK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 25, 2010. *369 Bruce Karpati, Richard G. Primoff, Alexander Javad Janghorbani, Nancy A. Brown, Panayiota Kilaras Bougiamas, U.S. Securi

MEMORANDUM DECISION AFTER TRIAL Meredith A. Jury, United States Bankruptcy Judge INTRODUCTION As succinctly stated in a recent trial decision from Hawaii, “ ‘[f]alse pretenses, a false representation, or actual fraud’ does not always require an express misrepresentation. For example, ‘a debt- or’s misleading conduct intended

*455 OPINION Justice NEWMAN. Appellants Ralph Nader (Nader) and Peter Miguel Camejo (Camejo) appeal two Orders of the Commonwealth Court assessing costs against them individually and against their unsuccessful campaign for the respective offices of President and Vice-President of the United States. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the

Chapter 11 POST-TRIAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SHELLEY C. CHAPMAN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE TABLE OF CONTENTS THE PARTIES.. .261 PROCEDURAL HISTORY.. .262 FINDINGS OF FACT.. .265 I. The Parties and Certain Relevant Third Parties... 265 II. The LightSquared

469 B.R. 713 (2012) In re TELESERVICES GROUP, INC., Debtor. Marcia R. Meoli, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. The Huntington National Bank, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. HG 05-00690. Adversary No. 07-80037. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan. March 30, 2012. *716 Douglas A. Donnell, Mark A. Kehoe, Mika Meyers Beckett & Jones

OPINION JEROME B. SIMANDLE, Chief Judge. Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION.16 II. BACKGROUND.17 A. Factual and Procedural Background.17 III. STANDARD OF REVIEW .22 IV. DISCUSSION. 23 A. The 365(h) Appellants’ Motions .23 1. The Circumstances of this Action Do Not Warran

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Filed July 16, 1998 No. 98-3069 In Re: Sealed Case No. 98-3069 --------- BEFORE: Edwards, Chief Judge; Wald, Silberman, Williams, Ginsburg, Sentelle, Henderson, Randolph, Rogers, Tatel and Garland, Circuit Judges. O R D E R Upon considerat

456 B.R. 318 (2011) In re TELESERVICES GROUP, INC., Debtor. Marcia R. Meoli, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. The Huntington National Bank, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. HG 05-00690. Adversary No. 07-80037. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan. August 17, 2011. *320 Douglas A. Donnell, Mark A. Kehoe, Mika Meyers Beckett & Jone