Cases

OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge 1. INTRODUCTION In this employment action, Plaintiff Matthew Webster (hereinafter, “Plaintiff’), a practicing Seventh Day Adventist, alleges that Defendants Dollar General, Inc., Bob Miller, and Vince Triboletti (hereinafter, “Defendants” or “Dollar General”) violated section 703(a) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (hereinafter, “Title VII”) and breached th

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-2104 ROBERT S. FARNIK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for th

*716 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge. This ease, the first of the Iraq war contract cases to proceed to trial in the United States Court of Federal Claims, involves a claim for the provision of dining facility (“DFAC”) services for the United States Army (the “Army”) at Camp Anaconda, one of the largest United States

ACCEPTED 03-15-00416-CV 7412400 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

FILED IN NO. 13-212 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 09/11/15 11:24:40 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk TAMI L. WOLE'F, C.S.R. PHONE: (830) 331-8286 NO. 13-212 ROBERTSON ELECTRIC, INC. ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT ) VS . ) 216TH JUD

Post-award Bid Protest; 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1); Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record; Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable Procurement; Subcontracting; Key Management Personnel; Responsiveness; Subcontractor Responsibility; 48 C.F.R. § 9.104-4. OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAMS, Judge. This post-award bid protest comes before

Opinion by Judge CALLAHAN; Concurrence by Judge HURWITZ. OPINION CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge: Defendants-Appellees Pacific Gas & Electric Company (“PG & E”) and Pacific Bell Telephone Company (“Pacific Bell”) own and maintain utility poles throughout the San Francisco Bay Area. Many of the poles are treated with a wood preservative that contains pentachlorophenol (“PCP”), a general

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge. This action is brought by the Vietnam Veterans of America (“WA”) Connecticut Greater Hartford Chapter 120, Vietnam Veterans of America, Vietnam Veterans of America Southern Connecticut Chapter 251, Vietnam Veterans of America Connecticut Chapter 270, and Vietnam Veterans of America Connecticut State Council aga

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-2475 JOHN M. KLUGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BROWNSBURG COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORP., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Chief Judge Rubén Castillo Plaintiff Lawrence S. Kirsch, as Shareholders’ Representative of Lawrence S. *681Kirsch, Charles W. Kriete, Michael J. Chase, and George Puszka (collectively “Shareholders”), brings this diversity action against Brightstar Corporation (“Brightstar”) alleging common law breach of con

ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING MOTIONS TO DECERTIFY CLASS MICHAEL J. SENG, United States Magistrate Judge. On April 19, 2011, the Court granted in part Plaintiffs’ Sabas Arrendondo, Jose Cue-vas, Hilario Gomez, Irma Landeros and Ro-salba Landeros (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) motion seeking class certification pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 85.) On March 22, 2013, Defendants f

ACCEPTED 15-25-00102-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/24/2025 12:08 PM NO. 15-25-00102-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK

ATTACHMENT B Case 1:20-cv-00849-CKK Document 138 Filed 12/12/20 Page 1 of 51 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA EDWARD BANKS, ef al., Plaintiffs, Vv. No. 1:20-cv-849 (CKK) QUINCY BOOTH, in his official capacity as Director of the District of Columbia Department of Corrections, ef al., Defendants. REPORT SUBMITTED BY AMICUS CURIAE PURSUANT TO SEPTEMBER 16, 2020 ORDER (Table of Contents, Report Narrative, Index to Exhibits, Appendix A Exhibits 1A — 6 and Appe

ACCEPTED 05-18-00647-CV 05-18-00647-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS Part 4 of 5