Cases

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00379-CV ___________________________ HUTCHINSON INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant V. DBL DESIGNS, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 348th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 348-299777-18 Before Kerr, Bassel, and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 22–1010 Submitted February 20, 2023—Filed May 5, 2023 CORY BURNETT, Appellant, vs. PHILLIP SMITH and STATE OF IOWA, Appellees. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Lars G. Anderson, Judge. A commercial truck driver who alleges that he was wrongfully arrested by an officer of the Iowa Department of Transportation appeals the summary judgme

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 22–1010 Submitted February 20, 2023—Filed May 5, 2023 CORY BURNETT, Appellant, vs. PHILLIP SMITH and STATE OF IOWA, Appellees. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Lars G. Anderson, Judge. A commercial truck driver who alleges that he was wrongfully arrested by an officer of the Iowa Department of Transportation appeals the summary judgme

OPINION BY SHOGAN, J.: Plaintiffs-Appellants, Joseph and April Parr (“the Parrs”), husband and wife, individually and as parents and guardians of their minor daughter, Samantha Parr, appeal from the August 31, 2012 judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, which was entered following the denial of the Parrs’ motion for post-trial relief. Appellees are Defendants Ford Motor Company, McCafferty Ford Sales,

770 F.Supp. 517 (1991) Laurie BRUNNER, As Guardian ad Litem for Jeremiah Brunner, A Minor, and Laurie Brunner, As an Individual, Plaintiff, v. HUTCHINSON DIVISION, LEAR-SIEGLER, INC., A Kansas Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Brad BRUNNER and H.L. Brunner and Sons, Third-Party Defendants. No. Civ. 89-5065. United States District Court, D. South Dakota, W.D.

976 A.2d 524 (2009) Tara GAUDIO, Individually and as The Administratrix of the Estate of Andrew M. Gaudio, as well as in Her Capacity as Parent to Patricia Gaudio, Catherine Gaudio, Rocco J. Gaudio, Brooklyn Gaudio, Minors, Appellant v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Autoliv, Gibbons Ford, Masthope Rapids Property Owners Council, Appellees. No. 1021 EDA 2007. Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

253 Kan. 741 (1993) 861 P.2d 1299 RYAN M. PATTON and KATHY PATTON STRUNK, Plaintiffs, v. HUTCHINSON WIL-RICH MANUFACTURING COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 68,665 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed October 29, 1993. Gary D. McCallister, of Davis, Wright, Unrein, Hummer & McCallister, of Topeka, argued the cause, and Anne L.

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of this

609 F.Supp. 556 (1985) Frederick CARPENTINO, Plaintiff, v. TRANSPORT INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Civ. A. No. N-84-141 (RCZ). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. March 13, 1985. *557 Joseph J. Kempf, Jr., Pearson, Baum & Weinstein, Hartford, Conn., for plaintiff. Stephen I. Traub, Lynch, Traub, Keefe and Sno

LOGAN, Circuit Judge. These appeals arise out of an action brought by Thomas K. Reed, Jr., against Aaacon Auto Transport, Inc., because Aaacon failed to deliver Reed’s automobile pursuant to their written contract. Aaacon appeals from an order denying its motion for partial summary judgment by declaration of law, and from those portions of the final judgment awarding Reed actu

FAGG, Circuit Judge. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc. (IBP) appeals from the judgment of the district court awarding Hughes A. Bagley, a former IBP employee, $7 million in compensatory and punitive damages as well as $2.33 million in prejudgment interest. That judgment was entered on three distinct claims: (1) libel; (2) tortious interfer

658 F.Supp.2d 921 (2009) LUXPRO CORPORATION, a Taiwanese corporation, Plaintiff v. APPLE, INC., f/k/a Apple Computer, Inc., Defendant. Case No. 08-CV-4092. United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Texarkana Division. September 28, 2009. *924 Glenn E. Janik, Patrick J. Conroy, Shore Chan Bragalone LLP, Dallas, TX, Richard A. A

MEMORANDUM OPINION CONTI, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION........................................................152 II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY................................................155 III. STANDARD OF REVIEW................................................156 A. Rule 23 Requirements for Class Certification............................156 <

449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri

969 F.Supp. 1460 (1997) William I. KOCH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KOCH INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 85-1636-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. July 11, 1997. *1461 *1462 *1463 *1464

946 F.Supp. 872 (1996) Vaughn L. MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant. No. 95-4126-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. October 22, 1996. *873 Kirk W. Lowry, Palmer & Lowry, Topeka, KS, for Vaughn L. Murphy. Leonard Singer, Allan L. Bioff, Brian J. Finucane, Sharon D. Hess, James R. Hol

332 Md. 247 (1993) 630 A.2d 1156 THOMAS S. GROSS ET UX. v. SUSSEX INCORPORATED ET AL. No. 72, September Term, 1992. Court of Appeals of Maryland. September 21, 1993. David P. Sutton, Baltimore, and Ralph W. Powers, Jr., Upper Marlboro, on brief, for petitioner. Gary R. Alexander (Todd K. Pounds and Denise M. Smithwick, Alexander &

83 Cal.Rptr.2d 548 (1999) 973 P.2d 527 20 Cal.4th 163 CEL-TECH COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. LOS ANGELES CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. No. S066735. Supreme Court of California. April 8, 1999. *552 Spiegel Liao & Kagay and Cha

628 F.Supp. 293 (1985) Kathryn LEACH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NEWPORT YELLOW CAB, INC., et al., Defendants. No. C-3-82-077. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D. August 22, 1985. *294 Barbara J. Pariente, West Palm Beach, Fla., Kenneth G. Rush, Springfield, Ohio, for plaintiffs. Gary D. Bullock, Carl J. Stitch, Cinc

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 381 May 16, 1946. *Page 382 This action is for the recovery in behalf of the State of South Carolina of the penalties which are imposed under the terms of section 7769 of the Code of 1942, recoverable of a foreign corporation (doing business in the state) failing to file the paper