Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
4 opinions for “Hurst v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.”
Santander Consumer USA Inc. v. Walshpublic domain
762 F.Supp.2d 217 (2010) SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC. and Drive Trademark Holdings, LP, Plaintiffs, v. Mark WALSH, Inofin, Inc, Drive USA 1, Inc. Drive USA 2, Inc. Drive USA 3, Inc. and Drive USA 4, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-11778-MBB. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. November 30, 2010. *222 Frank Alvare
Jeffrey Smith v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.public domain
PER CURIAM: In this FCRA case (Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681, et seq.), the jury found that Santander Consumer USA, Inc. (“Santander”), a consumer finance company, negligently failed to comply with the law by failing promptly to investigate Jeffrey Smith’s (“Smith”) credit dispute with Santander and to correct the information Santander misreport
CORNISH, Bankruptcy Judge. Creditor appeals an order of the bankruptcy court awarding actual damages of $474.86 and punitive damages of $25,000 to the individual Chapter 11 debtors as a sanction for its repossession of their vehicle.1 Believing the debtors had missed two monthly payments, creditor repossessed the vehicle approximately one year after the confirmed Chapter 11 plan re-vested the veh
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-19-00820-CV St. David’s Healthcare Partnership, LP; St. David’s Healthcare Partnership, LP, LLP; Round Rock Hospital, Inc.; St. David’s Healthcare System, Inc.; St. David’s Partnership, LP, LLP; and St. David’s Medical Center, Appellants v. Kristi Elaine Fuller f/k/a Kristi Elaine Baezetero, Appellee