Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Hurst v. Hurst”
Hurst v. Hurstpublic domain
[Cite as Hurst v. Hurst, 2020-Ohio-4006.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY JOSHUA HURST, : Appellant, : CASE NO. CA2019-07-119 : OPINION - vs -
Hurst v. Hurstpublic domain
ROY L. RICHTER, Judge Staci Hurst ("Mother") appeals from the trial court's judgment of dissolution ordering Thomas Hurst ("Father") to pay Mother child support of $341 per month for the parties' three children. We reverse and remand. I. Background Mother and Father were married on October 5, 1996. Three children were born of the marriage: their oldest daughter, born May 14, 1998; th
Hurst v. Hurstpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Darren Hurst (“the Husband”) appeals an order finding him in contempt for failure to pay temporary child support and requiring him to bring his child support payments current within five days. Because the Husband was not afforded due process, we reverse. During the pendency of the parties’ dissolution of marriage proceeding, the trial cour
Hurst v. Hurstpublic domain
[Cite as Hurst v. Hurst, 2014-Ohio-4762.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY JEFFREY HURST, : CASE NO. CA2013-10-100 Plaintiff-Appellee, : OPINION
Hurst v. Hurstpublic domain
[Cite as Hurst v. Hurst, 2013-Ohio-2674.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: WENDY M. HURST (RAMSEY) : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. : Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon.
Hurst v. Hurstpublic domain
973 So.2d 1164 (2007) Jann Kimberly HURST, n/k/a Jann Kimberly Papiernik, Appellant, v. Barry Lee HURST, Appellee. No. 1D07-0430. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. May 25, 2007. Steven P. Combs of Smith Green & Combs, Jacksonville, for Appellant. A. Russell Smith, Jacksonville, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Upon consideration
Estate of Hurst v. Hurstpublic domain
769 N.E.2d 55 (2002) 329 Ill. App.3d 326 263 Ill.Dec. 853 In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Robert Charles HURST, Deceased, Alicia E. Hurst and Julie Ann Hurst, Petitioners-Appellees and Cross-Appellants), v. Patsy J. HURST, Individually, Patsy J. Hurst, Administratrix With the Will Annexed of the Estate of Robert Charles Hurst, Deceased; Lori L. Hofferbert, and Todd A. Reid, Respondents-Appellants and
Hurst v. Hurstpublic domain
White, J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Fulton County (Jung, J.), entered October 26, 1994, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, for a modification of respondent’s visitation rights. Upon respondent’s failure to appear in response to the petition for modification of the visitation provisions of Family Court’s order entered January 7, 1994, a
Hurst v. Hurstpublic domain
OPINION James M. Hurst (Husband) appeals the distribution of property in the dissolution of his marriage to Barbara Sue Hurst (Wife). Husband raises five issues, which we consolidate and restate as: 1. Whether the trial court erred when it excluded certain real estate from the marital assets? 2. Whether the trial court erred in assigning value to property and by failing to consider all of the assets testified to at the fina
Roinette L. Hurst v. Eric B. Hurstpublic domain
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ July 15, 2025 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A25A2038. ROINETTE L. HURST v. ERIC B. HURST. In this divorce action, the trial court entered an order modifying child custody and finding Roinette Hurst in contempt of the court’s domestic standing order. Roinette directly appeals from that order. We, howeve
Brandon Hurst v. Jeffri Hurst (Now Wutz)public domain
04/10/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 18, 2025 Session BRANDON HURST v. JEFFRI HURST (NOW WUTZ) Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. 23CV-52205 Joseph A. Woodruff, Judge
Hurst v. Peterspublic domain
[Cite as Hurst v. Peters, 2025-Ohio-1958.] COURT OF APPEALS FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COLONEL ERIC Z. HURST : JUDGES: : Hon. Andrew J. King, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. : H
State v. Hurstpublic domain
No. 124,199 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ALLEN MICHAEL HURST, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. This court uses the four-part Barker balancing test to
Hurst v. Hurstpublic domain
On March 9, 1990, the trial court entered a final divorce decree, which was amended by the court's own initiative on March 16, 1990, pursuant to Rule 60(a), Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure. On April 3, 1990, the appellee (wife) filed a motion to alter, amend, or vacate the divorce decree. The trial court conducted a hearing on the wife's motion on May 3, 1990, but issued its amended decree on August 1, 1990, one hundred twenty days after the wife's motion was filed. The husban
People v. Hurstpublic domain
People v Hurst (2022 NY Slip Op 02670) People v Hurst 2022 NY Slip Op 02670 Decided on April 22, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
State v. Hurstpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Hurst, 2020-Ohio-2885.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2019-03-028 : OPINION - vs -
State v. Hurstpublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE Def. I.D. # 1808014637 RUSSELL J. HURST, JR., Nee Ne ee ee eee” a Ne NL Petitioner/Defendant. Submitted: October 12, 2020 Decided: November 20, 2020 Upon Petitioner’s Motion for Postconviction Relief (R-1) DENIED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Russell J. Hurst, Jr., SBI# 00027773, Sussex Correctional Institution, Box 500, Georgetown, DE 19947; Petitioner/Defendant. Derek G. Gay, Deputy Attorney General, Department of Just
State v. Hurstpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Hurst, 2020-Ohio-4899.] COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: STATE OF OHIO : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. : Hon. John W. Wise, J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon
Hurst v. Hurstpublic domain
Boslaugh, J. This case presents the same question as Wilson v. Ransom, post p. 427, 446 N.W.2d 6 (1989), which was decided today. For the reasons stated in Wilson v. Ransom, supra, the cause is remanded to the district court with directions to delete all provisions in the order of November 13, 1987, reciting that the order confirming registration of the Washington support order is a judgment in rem.
United States v. Hurstpublic domain
Appellate Case: 22-7041 Document: 010111008100 Date Filed: 03/01/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 1, 2024