Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Hurd v. Parris”
United States v. Matthewspublic domain
MEMORANDUM — DECISION and ORDER DAVID N. HURD, United States District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On September 11, 2006, a jury found petitioner-defendant Michael Matthews (“petitioner” or “Matthews”) guilty of conspiracy to commit bank robbery (“Count 1”) and committing a bank robbery on September 25, 2003, at a Fleet Bank in Syracuse, New York (“the Syracuse rob
Zeigler v. New Yorkpublic domain
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER DAVID N. HURD, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs, a putative class of appointed attorneys for indigent criminal defendants in Onondaga County, New York, represented by plaintiff Jason Zeigler (“Zeig-ler”) (the “attorney class”), and a putative class of indigent criminal defendants in local courts within Onondaga County, New Yor
United States v. Kemppublic domain
360 F.Supp.2d 697 (2005) UNITED STATES of America v. Corey KEMP, et al. No. CRIM.A. 04-370-02, No. CRIM.A. 04-370-03, No. CRIM.A. 04-370-04, No. CRIM.A. 04-370-05, No. CRIM.A. 04-370-06. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 18, 2005. *698 Michael A. Schwartz, Richard J. Zack, Robert A. Zauzmer, Catherine Votaw,
United States v. Kemppublic domain
362 F.Supp.2d 591 (2005) UNITED STATES of America v. Corey KEMP, et al. Criminal Action No. 04-370-02, Criminal Action No. 04-370-03, Criminal Action No. 040370-04, Criminal Action No. 04-370-05, Criminal Action No. 04-370-06. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 29, 2005. *592 Christopher D. Warren, Feldman and
United States v. Kemppublic domain
366 F.Supp.2d 255 (2005) UNITED STATES of America v. Corey KEMP, et al. No. CRIM.A. 04-370-02, No. CRIM.A. 04-370-03, No. CRIM.A. 04-370-04, No. CRIM.A. 04-370-05, No. CRIM.A. 04-370-06. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 21, 2005. Christopher D. Warren, Feldman and Pinto, Philadelphia, PA, Edwin J. Jacobs, Jr., Atlantic City, NJ, for P.C. Ronald
United States v. Mackpublic domain
MEMORANDUM — DECISION and ORDER DAVID N. HURD, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Defendant James Mack (“Mack” or “defendant”) brings this motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 seeking a vacatur of his sentence, re-sentencing, and a clarification of any off-the-record determinations made regarding his statements to the Probation Department. The United States of Am
United States v. Ballpublic domain
KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. Defendant Lonnie Ball challenges the district court’s enhancement of his sentence under the career offender guideline based on the court’s determination that Ball’s prior conviction for Pennsylvania second-degree robbery qualifies as a “crime of violence” as defined in § 4B1.2(a) of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (U.S.S.G.) (U.S. Sentencing Comm’n 2015
United States v. John Charles Kuchinskipublic domain
FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge: John C. Kuchinski appeals his conviction and sentence for receipt and possession of *856 child pornography. 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252A(a)(2), (a)(5)(B). Principally, he asserts that his prosecution for receipt and possession violated the double jeopardy clause,
Jasso v. Money Mart Express, Inc.public domain
Order Granting Motion To Compel Arbitration And Stay Civil Proceedings YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge. Plaintiff Janelle Jasso brings the instant action on behalf of herself and a putative class of similarly situated California employees for violation of California Labor Code sections governing, inter alia, overtime compensation, meal and rest breaks, reimbursement for employment-related
Rti, LLC v. Pro Engineeringpublic domain
#30565-aff in pt & rev in pt-JMK 2025 S.D. 64 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** RTI, LLC and RTI HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. PRO ENGINEERING, INC.; DESIGNARC GROUP, INC.; F.M. ACOUSTICAL TILE, INC.; TRANE U.S. INC.; and EKERN HOME EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Defendants and Appellees,
Alexander v. Oklahomapublic domain
LUCERO, Circuit Judge, dissenting, with whom SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge, joins. No case in my tenure on the court could be more compellingly described as meeting the Rule 35 en banc standard of presenting a “question of exceptional importance” deserving the attention of the entire court than this. In one of the more shameful events in our nation’s history, over two hundred African-Americans were slaughtered and a
Alexander v. Oklahomapublic domain
TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge. On May 31, 1921, and following into the next day, violent attacks destroyed the African-American community of Greenwood, Oklahoma. An angry white mob converged on Greenwood in a devastating assault, burning homes and businesses, killing up to three hundred people, and leaving thousands homeless. In February 2003, Plaintiffs-Appellants, all Riot survivors or descendants of survivors, filed suit a
Sealey v. Coughlinpublic domain
857 F.Supp. 214 (1994) Emmeth SEALEY, Plaintiff, v. Thomas J. COUGHLIN, III, Commissioner, Dept. of Corrections; Donald Selsky, Director of Special Housing/Inmate Discipline; T.H. Giltner; R. Brimmer, Defendants. No. 92-CV-47. United States District Court, N.D. New York. July 15, 1994. *215 *216
United States v. Trumanpublic domain
LOHIER, Circuit Judge: The Government appeals from a judgment issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Hurd, J.) granting Defendanb-Appellee Jeffrey E. Truman, Sr.’s (“Truman”) motion for a judgment of acquittal under Federal Rule of. Criminal Procedure 29(a) and conditionally granting Truman’s mo
Brown v. Hansenpublic domain
510 N.W.2d 473 (1993) Mary L. BROWN, Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. Todd C. HANSEN and Charles Hansen, Appellants and Cross-Appellees. No. A-91-1233. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. July 6, 1993. *474 Michael A. England and Stephen L. Ahl, of Wolfe, Anderson, Hurd, Luers & Ahl, Lincoln, for appellants. Patrick W. Heale
Janice Hartline v. Robert Stephen Hartlinepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 16, 2013 Session JANICE HARTLINE v. ROBERT STEPHEN HARTLINE Appeal from the Chancery Court for Bradley County No. 2011-CV-137 Jerri S. Bryant, Chancellor No. E2012-02593-COA-R3-CV-FILED-JANUARY 13, 2014 In this domestic relations action, the trial court granted Wife a divorce on fault-based gro
United States v. Kuchinskipublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 05-30607 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No. CR-04-00149-RFC JOHN CHARLES KUCHINSKI, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from
Black Political Task Force v. Galvinpublic domain
300 F.Supp.2d 291 (2004) BLACK POLITICAL TASK FORCE et al., Plaintiffs, v. William Francis GALVIN, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 02-11190. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 24, 2004. *292 *293 R
United States v. City of Euclidpublic domain
(2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF EUCLID, et al., Defendants. No. 1:06cv01652. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. April 16, 2008. ORDER KATHLEEN McDONALD O'MALLEY, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On July 10, 2006, the United States (the "government") filed a complaint, alleg
People v. Lewispublic domain
12 Cal.Rptr.3d 1 (2004) 117 Cal.App.4th 246 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Milton LEWIS, Jr., Defendant and Appellant. No. A098387. Court of Appeal, First District, Division Four. March 30, 2004. Rehearing Denied April 19, 2004. Review Denied June 30, 2004. *2 Re