Cases

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

543 U.S. 935 KINGv.HUNTER, WARDEN. No. 04-5853. Supreme Court of United States. October 12, 2004. 1 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

FILED June 16, 2023 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA

[Cite as Hunter v. Cole Tool & Die Co., 2023-Ohio-2131.] COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ROGER HUNTER : JUDGES: : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellant : Hon. William B. Hoffman, J.

PER CURIAM: * Plaintiff-Appellant Gary Jon Hunter (“Hunter”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights claim as moot. We agree with the district court that Hunter’s claim is moot and affirm. I. Facts & Proceedings A. Facts Hunter filed this action to challenge the retroactive application of Texas parole

Judgment rendered November 15, 2023. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 55,296-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** KATIE KING ALSTON

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA13-1003) Allowed Hunter, J., recused

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert Deon Hunter, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006).

Branch, Judge. In this medical malpractice action, the defendant hospital obtained summary judgment on the grounds that it did not employ the treating *538physician and that it was protected from vicarious liability because, in compliance with Georgia law, it posted a notice in a public area of the hospital to the effect that some or all of the health care professiona

HUNTER, JR., Robert N., Judge. Michael S. Bryant, M.D. (“Dr. Bryant”) and Village Surgical Associates, PA. (collectively, “Defendants”) appeal from an order of the Cumberland County Superior Court denying their “Motion to Stay Proceedings and Enforce Arbitration Agreement.” For the following reasons, we reverse and remand. I. Factual and Procedural History This appeal arises out of a med

STROUD, Judge. Michael King (“defendant”) appeals from a judgment entered 17 April 2012 in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County, after a jury found him guilty of one count of first-degree murder. Defendant argues on appeal that the trial court abused its discretion and violated his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel by denying his motion to continue. Defendant further contends that the trial court erred

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge: Plaintiff James Hunter, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on or about December 12, 2012 against Defendants City of New York, Officer Giuca, Shield # 9511 and Detective King, Shield # 4607, alleging deprivation of due process, breach of oath of office, deprivation of equal protection of the law and abuse of authority by indi

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. A county in Indiana may subsidize private disputé resolution in domestic-relations cases. See Ind. Code § 33-23-6-2. Marion County has such a program, which it calls the Marion County Domestic Relations Alternative Dispute Resolution Plan. We call it the Plan. The Plan provides financial assistance for parties with modest means to help defray the cost of mediation. A party to a domestic-relations su

721 S.E.2d 327 (2012) STATE of North Carolina v. Valerie Dawn Rathbone KING. No. COA11-526. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. February 7, 2012. *328 Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Special Deputy Attorney General E. Burke Haywood, for the State. Kevin P. Bradley, Durham, for defendant-appellant. CALABRIA, Judge.</

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the opinion, in which Judge MOTZ and Judge HARRIS joined. KING, Circuit Judge: In December 2007, qui tam relators Hunter Laboratories, L.L.C., and Chris Riedel (the “relators”) filed this civil action in the Circuit Court of Fairfax County against multiple medical laboratory businesses. The complai

BRYANT, Judge. Where the trial court concluded, pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 8C-1, Rule 403, that the probative value of the evidence sought to be admitted — expert testimony regarding repressed memory — was outweighed by the prejudicial effect of the evidence, confusion of issues, or misleading the jury, we find no abuse of discretion and affirm the trial court’s grant of defendant’s motion to suppress.

687 S.E.2d 267 (2009) EMORY-ADVENTIST, INC. v. HUNTER. Hunter v. Emory-Adventist, Inc. Nos. A09A0966, A09A0967. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 20, 2009. *268 Balch & Bingham, Michael J. Bowers, Malissa Kaufold-Wiggins, James D. Meadows, Michelle Rothenberg-Williams, Atlanta, for appellant. Joseph H.

HUNTER, JR., ROBERT N., Judge. *120Charlene Salzer, Mary Elder, and Martha Buffington ("Plaintiffs") appeal from an order granting dismissal of their complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand the decision of the district court.

PROST, Circuit Judge. MRC Innovations, Inc. appeals from a final judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio granting summary judgment of invalidity with respect to U.S. Design Patent Nos. D634,488 S (“'488 patent”) and D634,487 S (“'487 patent”). For the reasons stated below, we affirm. Background M

568 S.E.2d 864 (2002) Michael S. KING, Plaintiff, v. Carol P. KING, Defendant. No. COA01-1338. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. September 17, 2002. James A. Warren, Jr., Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellee. The Tryon Legal Group, by Jerry Alan Reese, Charlotte, for defendant-appellant. GREENE, Judge. Carol P. King (Defendant) appeals an order f