Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
6 opinions for “Humboldt Express, Inc. v. The Liberty Textile Company”
ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA
Kollmer v. Jackson Tennessee Hospital Co., LLCpublic domain
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT J. DANIEL BREEN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff, Denise Kollmer, brought this action against Defendant, Jackson Tennes*741see Hospital Company, LLC, d/b/a Regional Hospital of Jackson (“Regional”), alleging employment discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities
Hoch v. Hoch (In re Hoch)public domain
ORDER ALLOWING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Joseph N. Callaway, United States Bankruptcy Judge The matters before the court are the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Marilynn J. Hoch, individually and as trustee for the various trusts named in the case caption above (collectively, “Jane” or the “Debtor”) on February 2, 2017 (Dkt. 43; the “Jane Motion”),
Watts v. Lyon County Ambulance Servicepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION THOMAS B. RUSSELL, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon Defendants Lyon County Ambulance Service, Rod Murphy, Anthony Young, Steve Gilland, Lilburn Ann Denney, and John Sims’ Motion for Summary Judgment. (Docket No. 54.) Plaintiff Kenneth Watts has responded, (Docket No. 58), and Defendants have replied, (Docket No. 60). This matter now is ripe for adjudication. F
Gohl ex rel. J.G. v. Livonia Public Schoolspublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND/OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkts. 123, 127, 177, 179,184,190,192) MARK A. GOLDSMITH, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION In this civil rights case, Plaintiff Lauren Gohl, as next friend of her son J.G., alleges that Defendants violated J.G.’s rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment
Muller v. Hotsy Corp.public domain
917 F.Supp. 1389 (1996) Roger MULLER, Plaintiff, v. The HOTSY CORPORATION, Defendant. No. C 94-3040. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division. February 21, 1996. *1390 *1391 *1392 *1393