Cases

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT In Re: APEX EXPRESS CORPORATION; HUMBOLDT EXPRESS, INCORPORATED, Debtors. HUMBOLDT EXPRESS, INCORPORATED, No. 98-2204 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THE WISE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-357-3-P, BK-96

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge MURNAGHAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge LUTTIG and Judge KING joined. OPINION MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Humboldt Express, Inc. (“Humboldt”), a freight trucking corporation in bankruptcy, seeks to recover amounts allegedly owed by Defendant The

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING THE COURT’S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY COUNSEL FOR BOTH PARTIES SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED FOR DISCOVERY ABUSES MARK W. BENNETT, U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ... 171 A. Factual Background ... 171 1. The nature of the litigation .. .1

ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA

APPEL, Justice. Eight residents of Muscatine filed a lawsuit 1 on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated Muscatine residents against Grain Processing Corporation (GPC), which operates a local corn wet milling facility. The residents claim the operations at GPC’s facility cause harmful pollutants and noxious odors

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 13–0723 Filed June 13, 2014 LAURIE FREEMAN, SHARON MOCKMORE, BECCY BOYSEL, GARY D. BOYSEL, LINDA L. GOREHAM, GARY R. GOREHAM, KELCEY BRACKETT, and BOBBIE LYNN WEATHERMAN, Appellants, vs. GRAIN PROCESSING CORPORATION, Appellee. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Muscatine County, Mark J. Smith, Judge. Appellants assert the district court improperly g

821 F.2d 1147 1987 A.M.C. 2735 In re AIR CRASH DISASTER NEAR NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA ON JULY9, 1982.Luis Alberto TRIVELLONI-LORENZI, and Susanna ElectraTrivelloni-Lorenzi, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants.Ernesto Serio PAMPIN LOPEZ, Individually and AsAdministrator of the Estate of His Deceased MotherSara E. Lopez De Pampin, Plaintiff-A

ROBERT MADDEN HILL, Circuit Judge: * These consolidated cases arise from the crash shortly after takeoff of Pan American World Airways Flight 759 near New Orleans, Louisiana. The plaintiffs are foreign citizens who sought recompense for their injuries in a Louisiana federal court. Pan American World Airways, Inc. (Pan American) invoked the doctrine of forum non conveniens, insisting that the pl

MEMORANDUM OPINION BATTIN, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment. The United States brought this action to enjoin defendants from the use of two roadways within the Helena National Forest — the American Bar and the Hoffman Cutoff— for an underground electrical power line. The United States also seeks declaratory relief as to the scope of the federal grant that

MacKINNON, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: We are here called upon to rule in a backhanded way upon the validity under the antitrust laws of the National Football League’s 1968 college player draft.1 The *1192litiga

302 F.Supp. 539 (1969) UNITED NUCLEAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 68-1395. United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania. July 3, 1969. *540 Counsel for the plaintiff are J. B. H. Carter, and John G. Harkins, Jr., of Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Philadelphia, Pa., and Arthu

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 19-1582 19-1625 UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. NIA MOORE-BUSH, a/k/a Nia Dinzey, Defendant, Appellee. Nos. 19-1583 19-1626 UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. DAPHNE MOORE

Opinion GEORGE, C. J. For the third time in recent years, this court is called upon to address a question under California law relating to marriage and same-sex couples. In Lockyer v. City and County of San Francisco (2004) 33 Cal.4th 1055 [17 Cal.Rptr.3d 225, 95 P.3d 459] (Lockyer), we were faced with the question whether pub

19 Mass. App. Ct. 700 (1985) 477 N.E.2d 182 LEONARD J. ARONSON[1] vs. BROOKLINE RENT CONTROL BOARD. Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Norfolk. January 8, 1985. April 24, 1985. Present: GREANEY, C.J., KAPLAN, & WARNER, JJ. Anita E. Cohen (Leslie H. Rudnick with her) for the plaintiff. Roger R. Lipson

917 F.Supp. 1389 (1996) Roger MULLER, Plaintiff, v. The HOTSY CORPORATION, Defendant. No. C 94-3040. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division. February 21, 1996. *1390 *1391 *1392 *1393

464 F.Supp. 1316 (1978) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jerome BOUCHARD, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. BEN RUBY AND SONS, B. I. Bliss, Brownton State Bank of Minnesota, Brownton, Wisconsin, Chippewa Farm Land Company, Edward J. Conroy, J. S. Crisler, S. B. Davis, Dells Lumber and Shingle Company, Frank A. Froemel, Helen Froemel, Jessie M. Froemel, Judy M. Froemel, Louis Froemel, Mary Froemel, Roger M. Froe

62 F.2d 139 (1932) HANNA et al. v. BRICTSON MFG. CO. et al. No. 9478. Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. November 30, 1932. Rehearing Denied January 13, 1933. *140 William Ritchie, Jr., of Omaha, Neb. (David A. Fitch, of Omaha, Neb., Holton Davenport and G. B. Braithwaite, both of Sioux Falls, S. D., A. C.

588 F.Supp. 247 (1984) Irene ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. No. C-79-0515J. United States District Court, D. Utah, C.D. May 10, 1984. *248 *249 *250 *251

351 Mich. 652 (1958) 88 N.W.2d 564 CLEVELAND-CLIFFS IRON COMPANY v. CORPORATION & SECURITIES COMMISSION. Docket No. 44, Calendar No. 47,064. Supreme Court of Michigan. Decided March 6, 1958. *657 Snyder & Loomis and Jones, Day, Cockley & Reavis, for plaintiff. Thomas M.