Cases

POSNER, Circuit Judge. The Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681 'et seq., provides that “if any case arising or filed under Title 11 [the Bankruptcy Code] is withdrawn by the consumer before a final judgment, the consumer reporting agency shall include in the report that such case or filing was withdrawn upon receipt of documentation certifying such

ORDER WARD, District Judge. The plaintiffs, in compliance with the court’s order, filed a status report concerning this case (see docket entry # 119). The court ordered the status report because of its concern with allowing the class claims to proceed against The Credit Store. Having considered the status report, the court, sua *308

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RIYAN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:24-cv-02017-RCL CONSUMERINFO.COM, INC. and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case concerns Plaintiff Riyan Williams’ suit against defendants ConsumerInfo.com, Inc. (CIC) and Exper

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SIM LAKE, District Judge. Toliver filed suit on August 14, 2012, against Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”) and Trans Union, LLC (“Trans Union”) alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), and against LVNV Funding, LLC (“LVNV”) alleging violations of the FCRA and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). Her claims arise from

793 F.Supp.2d 1098 (2011) Carla PAUL, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant. Civil No. 09-1102 (DSD/AJB). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. June 22, 2011. Trista M. Roy, Consumer Justice Center PA, and Thomas J. Lyons, Lyons Law Firm P.A., Vadnais Heights, MN, for Plaintiff. Michael S. Poncin, Esq., James R. Bedell, Esq. and

633 F.3d 1006 (2011) Ray BIRMINGHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; Verizon Communications; Vodafone Group, PLC., a joint venture, d/b/a Verizon Wireless; Cellular Inc. Network; Utah RSA 6; Verizon Power Partners; Wasatch Utah RSA No. 2, d/b/a Verizon Wireless; *1007 Verizon Wireless Utah, operating under the name and style of Verizon Wireless; Verizon Wireless (VAW), Defendants-

(2008) Karl FAHEY, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant. No. 4:05CV01453 FRB. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. July 23, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FREDERICK R. BUCKLES, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on the motion of Experian Information Solutions,

650 F.3d 1139 (2011) FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION; myFICO Consumer Services, Inc., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; VantageScore Solutions, LLC; Does I through V, Defendants/Appellees. Fair Isaac Corporation; myFICO Consumer Services, Inc., Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.; VantageScore Solutions, LLC, Defendants/Appellants. Nos. 10-2281, 10-2409.

321 F.Supp.2d 1109 (2004) Donel Avion REED, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., CSC Credit Services, Inc., Trans Union LLC, and Providian Financial Corporation d/b/a Providian National Bank, Defendants. No. CIV.02-3706 DSD/JGL. United States District Court, D. Minnesota. April 14, 2004. *1110 Thomas J. Lyons, Esq.

289 F.Supp.2d 956 (2003) Michael MOLINE, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant. No. 03 C 1375. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 23, 2003. *957 Larry Paul Smith, Krohn & Moss, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for plaintiff. Gregory Steven Otsuka, Jones Day, Chicago, IL, fo

645 F.Supp.2d 734 (2009) FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION and myFICO Consumer Services, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC.; Trans Union, LLC; VantageScore Solutions, LLC; and Does I through X, Defendants. Civil No. 06-4112 ADM/JSM. United States District Court, D. Minnesota. July 24, 2009. *737 Charles F. Rule, Esq.,

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT E. PAYNE, Senior District Judge. ■ This case is before the Court on the Defendants’ MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(1) (Docket No. 23). For the reasons set forth below, this motion will be denied. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, James Ryals, Jr. (“Ryals”) applied for employment with GCA Services Group, In

494 F.Supp.2d 127 (2007) Herschel COLLINS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EXPERIAN CREDIT REPORTING SERVICE, et al., Defendants. No. 3:04CV1905 (MRK). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. July 6, 2007. *128 Gary J.C. Woodfield, New Britain, CT, for Plaintiffs. A. Gregory Gibbs, Jones Day, New York, NY, Joseph V. Meaney, J

USCA11 Case: 16-16486 Date Filed: 10/28/2020 Page: 1 of 148 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-16486 & 16-16783 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 0:15-cv-60716-WPD DR. DAVID S.

*313 MAXWELL, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. The circuit court denied Brio-vaRX’s motion to compel arbitration because BriovaRX was not a party to the arbitration agreement it sought to enforce. But in Mississippi, a non-signatory can enforce an arbitration agreement when

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. On June 28, 2011, Robert Briseno filed a complaint against ConAgra;1 between Oc*938tober and December 2011, the court consolidated several cases filed against ConA-gra under the caption above

733 F.Supp.2d 835 (2010) Joseph A. GIRGIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:10-CV-590. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio. August 20, 2010. *840 Gary Cook, Cleveland, OH, for Plaintiffs. Barbara Friedman Yaksic, Richard A. Freshwater, McGlinchey Stafford, Cleveland, O

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ANN D. MONTGOMERY, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On February 15, 2013, the undersigned United States District Judge heard oral argument on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment and on the parties’ motions to exclude expert testimony. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ summary judgment motion is denied. Plaintiffs summary judgment motio

(2008) Patricia HOLMES v. TELECHECK INTERNATIONAL, INC. and Telecheck Services, Inc. No. 3:05-0633. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. January 10, 2008. MEMORANDUM TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge. Pending before the Court are the parties' renewed cross-motions for summary judgment (Docket Nos. 329 and 349) to w

524 F.Supp.2d 866 (2007) Margarita VILLAGRAN, Plaintiff, v. CENTRAL FORD, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. H-05-2685. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. October 23, 2007. *867 Ashish Mahendru, Mahendru PC, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff. Philip S. Gordon, Gordon Law Firm, Houston, TX, for Defendant.</