Cases

OPINION RICKHOFF, Justice. In this case of first impression in Texas, Harold and Rebecca Kinnard appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of Circle K Stores, Inc. (“Circle K”) on their claim that Circle K breached its duty to them to sell lottery tickets in conformity with their instructions. We affirm. FACTS Rebecca Kinnard bought tickets for the January 2,

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER MARIANA R. PFAELZER, District Judge. I. Introduction Plaintiff California Institute of Technology (“Caltech”) has asserted U.S. Patent No. 7,116,710 (“the '710 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 7,421,032 (“the '032 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 7,916,781 (“the '781 patent”), and U.S. Patent No. 8,284,833 (“the '833 patent,”) against Defendants Hughes Communications, In

[J-69A&B-2021] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT BAER, C.J., SAYLOR, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. CARL F. HUGHES AND ELLEN B. : No. 49 MAP 2021 HUGHES, H/W, AND BRUCE D. : HUGHES AND MARGARET K. HUGHES, : Appeal from the Commonwealth Court H/W, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF : dated 11/12/20 at No. 453 CD 2019 OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY : affirming the order of the Ti

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: Plaintiffs Patrick Hughes (“Hughes”) and Nafise Nina Hodjat (“Hodjat”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) bring this class action in diversity on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated against Ester-C Company (a subsidiary of NBTY, Inc.), NBTY, Inc., and NatureSmart LLC (collectively, “defendants” or “Ester-C Co.”). Specifically, plaintiffs alle

REVERSE; and Opinion Filed July 24, 2018. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00486-CV KYӒNI, INC., TODD THOMPSON, SCOTT BOULCH, VOLKER HARTZSCH A/K/A MARK DAVENPORT, BRANDON STEVENS, AND JAMES BRADFORD, Appellants V. HD WALZ II ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellee

EBEL, Circuit Judge. This ease arises from a municipality’s exercise of its zoning authority to regulate hazardous waste disposal, recycling, and treatment within its borders. The Plaintiff-Appellant, Blue Circle Cement, Inc. (“Blue Circle”), raises both federal constitutional and state law challenges to the hazardous waste zoning ordinance enacted by the Defendant-Appellee, t

Case: 23-1435 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 10/18/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ UTTO INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. METROTECH CORP., AKA VIVAX-METROTECH, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2023-1435 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Distri

LOGAN, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff, Frances Snider, upon being terminated by her employer, Circle K Corporation, filed the instant action alleging violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, breach of contract, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The Title VII claim was determined by the judge, who found in favor of Circle K; the other claims were determ

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CRAIG SAMUELS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-0358-PAF ) CCUR HOLDINGS, INC., DAVID J. ) NICOL, ROBERT PONS, and ) STEVEN G. SINGER, ) )

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) IN RE MATCH GROUP, INC. ) CONSOLIDATED DERIVATIVE LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 2020-0505-MTZ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: May 4, 2022 Date Decided: September 1, 2022 Michael Hanrahan, J. Clayton Athey, Corinne E. Amato, Kevin H. Davenport, Jaso

FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: Attorneys for Camoplast Croker, LLC BRUCE P. CLARK DANIEL S. CHAMBERLAIN JENNIFER E. DAVIS Doehrman Chamberlain COURT L. FARRELL Indianapolis, Indiana St. John, Indiana Attorneys for Seats, Inc. JOSHUA B. FLEMING LUCY R. DOLLENS TIMOTHY L. KARNS Feb 20 2014, 8:

OPINION ON LIABILITY TURNER, Judge. Hughes Aircraft Company owns U.S. Patent No. 3,758,051, entitled “Velocity Control and Orientation of a Spin-Stabilized Body,” which describes an apparatus for controlling the attitude of a spin-stabilized spacecraft.1 Hughes brought this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498, seeking just compensation for the unauthorized use or manufacture by or

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ED KINKEADE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is SAP America, Inc.’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 57). After careful consideration of the motion, the response, the reply, the notice of supplemental authority, the supporting appendices, the applicable law, and any relevant portions of the record, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs motion.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE XURA, INC. : CONSOLIDATED STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION : C.A. No. 12698-VCS : MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: September 11, 2018 Date Decided: December 10, 2018 A. Thompson Bayliss, Esquire and David A. Seal, Esquire of Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, Delaware, Attorneys f

USCA11 Case: 19-13926 Date Filed: 09/06/2022 Page: 1 of 104 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-13926 ____________________ ANTONIO GONZALEZ CARRIZOSA, et al., Plaintiffs, DOE 378, LUDY RIVAS BORJA, as da

(Confidentiality Agmt. Background.) The Confidentiality Agreement defined "Proprietary Information" as: (a) all technology, know how, plans, designs, specifications, formulas, technical information, drawings, and other information related to the Company's products, production equipment, and manufacturing processes, (b) audited and internally prepared financial statements and related supplementary

SEAN H. LANE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court is Republic Airways Holdings Inc., et. al. 's ("Republic" or the "Debtors") Motion for Summary Judgment with Respect to its Objection to Claims Filed by Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A., as Owner Trustee, and ALF VI, Inc., as Owner Participant (the "SJM") [ECF No. 2029]. The SJM addresses two major issues in the aircraft leases between these parties: (i)

WINCHESTER, J., dissenting: ¶ 1 I respectfully dissent. It is important to point out what 23 O.S.2011, § 61.2 does not do: (1) it does not cap damages in cases of wrongful death; (2) it does not cap economic damages for lost wages; (3) it does not cap economic damages for medical expenses; and (4) it does not bar the first $350,000 of non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering. With the passage of § 61.2, the Legislature dete

OSCN Found Document:BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC. BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.2019 OK 28Case Number: 114301Decided: 04/23/2019THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2019 OK 28, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO RE

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC. ) Consol. C.A. No. CLASS V STOCKHOLDERS LITIGATION ) 2018-0816-JTL MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: March 13, 2020 Date Decided: June 11, 2020 Ned Weinberger, Derrick Farrell, Mark Richardson, Thomas Curry, LABATON SUCHAROW LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; David M. Cooper, Silpa Maruri, Dominic Pod